View Poll Results: Who will win the East?

Voters
172. You may not vote on this poll
  • Duke

    165 95.93%
  • Michigan State

    3 1.74%
  • Louisiana State

    2 1.16%
  • Virginia Tech

    2 1.16%
  • Mississippi State

    0 0%
  • Maryland

    0 0%
  • Louisville

    0 0%
  • Virginia Commonwealth

    0 0%
  • Central Florida

    0 0%
  • Minnesota

    0 0%
  • Belmont

    0 0%
  • Temple

    0 0%
  • Liberty

    0 0%
  • St. Louis

    0 0%
  • Yale

    0 0%
Page 4 of 16 FirstFirst ... 2345614 ... LastLast
Results 61 to 80 of 304
  1. #61
    Quote Originally Posted by ChillinDuke View Post
    The South Carolina game, IMO, is the barometer for a truly terrible matchup. A streaking team playing right in their own backyard that was probably seeded too low with UNC fans in the same spot. That's annoying, objectively unfair for a #2 seed, and foreseeable. We don't have that situation here - really anywhere in our bracket.
    That game against SC still gets me heated to this day...I thought we had a Final Four team at a minimum and likely a championship team peaking at the right time. Playing what amounted to a stacked road game in a hostile environment amplified by the presence of rival fans...ugh.

  2. #62
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    New Jersey
    Quote Originally Posted by ChillinDuke View Post
    I won't further belabor my point, as this was way more than I intended on writing. But suffice to say, I see nothing particularly scary or irritating about our bracket, let alone offensive or downright wrong. In fact, I think our bracket is about as good as we can hope for, short of the NCAA changing the Tourney rules and just gifting us a title today.

    - Chillin
    It's over
    Rich
    "Failure is Not a Destination"
    Coach K on the Dan Patrick Show, December 22, 2016

  3. #63
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Undisclosed
    Quote Originally Posted by KandG View Post
    That game against SC still gets me heated to this day...I thought we had a Final Four team at a minimum and likely a championship team peaking at the right time. Playing what amounted to a stacked road game in a hostile environment amplified by the presence of rival fans...ugh.
    And in Charlotte a few years prior (Kyrie's return, and a second-round match with Michigan IIRC) it was the same thing. Full of Carolina fans, essentially a road game.

    They should never put big rivals in the same pod. Same would go for UK-Louisville and others.

  4. #64
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    New York, NY
    Quote Originally Posted by OldPhiKap View Post
    And in Charlotte a few years prior (Kyrie's return, and a second-round match with Michigan IIRC) it was the same thing. Full of Carolina fans, essentially a road game.

    They should never put big rivals in the same pod. Same would go for UK-Louisville and others.
    This brings up a good question: Can someone remind me what the advent of the Pod System was? I think Jay Bilas alluded to this on air yesterday. Did something happen where they grouped top teams together too early or something that got people up in arms so they created a Pod System?

    My initial thought is that people would say it's too subjective to define "big rivals". But without knowing why we even use Pods, I will refrain from opining.

    - Chillin

  5. #65
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Raleigh
    Quote Originally Posted by OldPhiKap View Post
    And in Charlotte a few years prior (Kyrie's return, and a second-round match with Michigan IIRC) it was the same thing. Full of Carolina fans, essentially a road game.

    They should never put big rivals in the same pod. Same would go for UK-Louisville and others.
    Correct and correct. We were there but did not attend the Greenville debacle so I can't compare. None of our party of 4 complained *that* much about the cheater fans beyond our usual level of disgust, but they certainly weren't there to cheer the Devils on to a victory.
    [redacted] them and the horses they rode in on.

  6. #66
    There are some really potentially mouth-watering matchups here. For me, the most notable would be Duke/VT and Duke/MSU.

    If Robinson really is 100%, or close to it, and they escape the 1st weekend, he should have enough time back on the floor to reintegrate pretty well. I doubt the team play/cohesion will be as good as if he never left, or came back last week, but still should be pretty solid. Watching Jones match up on Robinson would just be amazing for me from a 1-v-1 perspective. I really do think Jones is one of the best defenders in the nation, but Robinson, when he's playing well, it SPECIAL. Like probably 1st team all ACC special if he hadn't gotten injured. Additionally, having him creates MUCH more freedom and flexibility for alexander-walker who looked like a COMPLETELY different player while Robinson was out. When those two were playing together and clicking, they were as dangerous and complete of an offensive backcourt as you'd find anywhere in the nation. Add in the fact that VT is an EXCELLENT 3pt shooting team and Blackshear really blossomed and gained confidence with a more featured role while Robinson was out, and VT has a 1-2-3 punch that is as good as anyone's...... except Duke. Despite ALL of that above, I can't pick against a fully healthy Duke squad. In fact, I don't think there's a team in the last 4 seasons I'd pick against this Duke squad. That confidence, combined with the very real possibility that Robinson may be much less than 100%, would keep me from picking VT to pull the upset in ANY of my brackets. Still, it has the potential to be an amazing game to watch.

    If Duke does meet up with MSU in the regional final, I'll be riveted to watch Winston vs Jones matchup, as well as the battle for the boards. I think when things get tight, 2nd chance points are a HUGE key for Duke, and historically, MSU does a terrific job at owning the glass. I haven't run any of the numbers vis-a-vis kenpom rankings to see what the chances are of a Duke-MSU regional final, but I'm sure it's less likely than most people would imagine. Still, I'm really hoping to watch what should be another incredible matchup.

    Other thoughts on the East-

    - I have absolutely NO clue what to expect from LSU or Maryland. It wouldn't shock me for either to get to the regional final, or to be out in the first round. If *either* of those schools had great in-game strategy coaches, they'd probably be borderline 1-seeds. Instead, there's an all too likely possibility we'll get Yale or Belmont as Cinderellas into the S16.

    - The "Pitino Bowl", for all the talk, I think will be a yawner. I know Louisville has had some epic chokes, but Minnesota's offense is dreadful. Beyond dreadful. And while their D is pretty good, Minnesota generates NOTHING from a turnover perspective, so chances for easy buckets just aren't there. I think Louisville is going to absolutely hammer them, which leads to...

    -The most intriguing game in the round of 32 is a potential rematch of Louisville vs MSU (who they actually beat at home in OT during the ACC-B1G challenge). I'm thinking MSU pays them back in spades, but Louisville has shown at their best, they can compete with anybody. The question is whether Mack can get them to play consistently smart for a full 40 min. My money is on "no", but I wouldn't be shocked if they pulled the upset.

    My "completely-unscientific-and-conjured-from-thin-air" region odds to advance to FF:
    Duke - 70%
    MSU - 15%
    VT - 6%
    LSU/Lou/MD - 8% (aggregate)
    Other - 1%

  7. #67
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Cary, NC
    I have totally overlooked the fact that Louisville is in our region as well. Man, there’s another rematch I would rather avoid.

  8. #68
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    NC
    Quote Originally Posted by UrinalCake View Post
    I have totally overlooked the fact that Louisville is in our region as well. Man, there’s another rematch I would rather avoid.
    Well, as a 7 seed, it is highly unlikely we'd have to face them. And frankly, if they are our elite-8 opponent, I'd be thrilled.

  9. #69
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Raleigh, NC
    Quote Originally Posted by UrinalCake View Post
    I have totally overlooked the fact that Louisville is in our region as well. Man, there’s another rematch I would rather avoid.
    I know in my brain that I should feel that way, but my heart would love to see the rematch just to see all the recaps of that epic comeback.

  10. #70
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    New Jersey
    Quote Originally Posted by ChillinDuke View Post
    This brings up a good question: Can someone remind me what the advent of the Pod System was? I think Jay Bilas alluded to this on air yesterday. Did something happen where they grouped top teams together too early or something that got people up in arms so they created a Pod System?

    My initial thought is that people would say it's too subjective to define "big rivals". But without knowing why we even use Pods, I will refrain from opining.

    - Chillin
    I believe it was so that higher ranked teams did not have the disadvantage of traveling to sites that were closer to the lower ranked team, at least for the first two rounds. This year there are pod games for the West and South regions in Hartford, for example.
    Rich
    "Failure is Not a Destination"
    Coach K on the Dan Patrick Show, December 22, 2016

  11. #71
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Steamboat Springs, CO
    Quote Originally Posted by UrinalCake View Post
    I have totally overlooked the fact that Louisville is in our region as well. Man, there’s another rematch I would rather avoid.
    Quote Originally Posted by CDu View Post
    Well, as a 7 seed, it is highly unlikely we'd have to face them. And frankly, if they are our elite-8 opponent, I'd be thrilled.
    Quote Originally Posted by Acymetric View Post
    I know in my brain that I should feel that way, but my heart would love to see the rematch just to see all the recaps of that epic comeback.
    In general, because there is a better prospect for "shock and awe," I prefer to face teams in the NCAA's that haven't played Duke in the same season. Especially when we are the #1 seed.
    Sage Grouse

    ---------------------------------------
    'When I got on the bus for my first road game at Duke, I saw that every player was carrying textbooks or laptops. I coached in the SEC for 25 years, and I had never seen that before, not even once.' - David Cutcliffe to Duke alumni in Washington, DC, June 2013

  12. #72
    Quote Originally Posted by gocanes0506 View Post
    In the end, Duke has to make 3s. I bet we see every team sagging the defense. They should play the FSU style defense. As long as opposing teams don't play FSU offense from the 2nd half and missed everything, the game should be close. If Duke makes 30-40% of their threes then they should win easily.
    This season Duke has shot below 30% in 16 of our 34 games. In those 16 games we've gone 13-3. Two of the three losses were to a #1 seed who happens to be our arch-rival in which our best player was hurt and didn't play (and in one of them our starting center didn't play, either). The third loss was in overtime and both our starting PG and another starter didn't play. Others have already chimed in on this (and I'm by no means saying we can't lose), but it seems pretty clear that absent another major injury we won't have to make threes to win, against pretty much anyone.

    Quote Originally Posted by ChillinDuke View Post
    That said, for those looking for something to annoy them, I don't see it even with an honest set of eyes. The South Carolina game, IMO, is the barometer for a truly terrible matchup. A streaking team playing right in their own backyard that was probably seeded too low with UNC fans in the same spot. That's annoying, objectively unfair for a #2 seed, and foreseeable. We don't have that situation here - really anywhere in our bracket. Va Tech is as close as I can get to irritated, but even that is 3 games away (for both teams) and integration of their PG is by no means a day-1 value add. It might end up being a godsend for them, but treating that hypothetical game as though it's immediately a value add for them is not using "honest eyes".
    If you want to imagine DBR (and most of the rest of Duke-world) exploding, just think of the reaction if we have to play 6-seed Maryland in DC in the Elite Eight.

  13. #73
    Just thought of this too - there's a real possibility that at least 2 of these fanbases get to DC for the regional semis and final:
    -Maryland
    -VT
    -Louisville
    Hopefully for Duke's sake, they have a ton of Blue Devil fans show up and keep it from feeling like a road game should 2 or even (gasp) all 3 of those teams get through.

  14. #74
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Undisclosed
    Quote Originally Posted by Wahoo2000 View Post
    Just thought of this too - there's a real possibility that at least 2 of these fanbases get to DC for the regional semis and final:
    -Maryland
    -VT
    -Louisville
    Hopefully for Duke's sake, they have a ton of Blue Devil fans show up and keep it from feeling like a road game should 2 or even (gasp) all 3 of those teams get through.
    Duke has a huge alum base in the DC area. Not saying that we would outdraw Md or VT there, but I think we'd hold our own.

  15. #75
    Quote Originally Posted by OldPhiKap View Post
    I'm just glad we're not in de Annapolis region.
    That was actually a pretty amusing set of commercials with Charles, Spike and Samuel

  16. #76
    Quote Originally Posted by Acymetric View Post
    I know in my brain that I should feel that way, but my heart would love to see the rematch just to see all the recaps of that epic comeback.
    I think a rematch with Louisville has the possibility of turning out similarly in the rematch with Maryland in 2001. If you recall, the regular season game (gone in 60 seconds or whatever) pre-dated the huge come back in the national semi's -- Maryland was way up in the first half but by the end of the game, we beat them by double digits

  17. #77
    We are -175 to win the East Region according to http://www.betonline.ag/sportsbook/f.../ncaam-futures. Michigan State is +400 and the 4 seed, Va. Tech is +1000 which is ahead of the 3 seed LSU who is +1100. By comparison, UNC is +200 to win the Midwest, Gonzaga +125 to win the West and UVA is +140 to win the South. The two most heavily favored 2 seeds to make the final four are Michigan and Kentucky, both at +275. We are +225 to win the title and are followed by Gonzaga(+500), UVA(+550), UNC(+800), Kentucky(+1200) and MSU (+1200).

  18. #78
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Washington, D.C.

    Right

    Quote Originally Posted by OldPhiKap View Post
    Duke has a huge alum base in the DC area. Not saying that we would outdraw Md or VT there, but I think we'd hold our own.
    Plus, would anyone from Big Ten country travel all the way to DC? :-)

  19. #79
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    I moved. Now 12 miles from Heaven, 13 from Hell
    Quote Originally Posted by ChillinDuke View Post
    This brings up a good question: Can someone remind me what the advent of the Pod System was? I think Jay Bilas alluded to this on air yesterday. Did something happen where they grouped top teams together too early or something that got people up in arms so they created a Pod System?

    My initial thought is that people would say it's too subjective to define "big rivals". But without knowing why we even use Pods, I will refrain from opining.

    - Chillin
    The pod system started in 2002, after the west region sub-regional in, I believe Boise, featured three teams from the Maryland/DC area, including the Terps. Somebody finally realized that the first two rounds didn’t need to be held in the same region as the next two rounds. It also reduced overall travel significantly.

    ( It probably wouldn’t have been as big a deal if it had been held in Alaska. Gary Williams would have felt at home.)

  20. #80
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Cary, NC
    Quote Originally Posted by Kedsy View Post
    Others have already chimed in on this (and I'm by no means saying we can't lose), but it seems pretty clear that absent another major injury we won't have to make threes to win, against pretty much anyone.
    I think it would gloriously fitting if a program with a reputation of basing its style on “slow white guys shooting threes,” which is of course inaccurate to begin with, wound up winning a title by shooting the lowest three point percentage of any champion in history, led by the most athletic player in history.

Similar Threads

  1. WBB East Region - Duke (#2) vs. Hampton (#15) Sat. ~9pm
    By DU82 in forum Elizabeth King Forum
    Replies: 33
    Last Post: 03-20-2017, 02:36 AM
  2. Replies: 277
    Last Post: 03-27-2016, 11:10 PM
  3. Elite 8- East Region: Syracuse 55, Marquette 39
    By Newton_14 in forum Elizabeth King Forum
    Replies: 46
    Last Post: 04-01-2013, 02:13 PM
  4. East/Boston region discussion (Syracuse #1)
    By hurleyfor3 in forum Elizabeth King Forum
    Replies: 105
    Last Post: 03-25-2012, 03:47 PM
  5. MBB: East Regional Discussion (Duke's region)
    By Troublemaker in forum Elizabeth King Forum
    Replies: 203
    Last Post: 03-28-2009, 10:08 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •