Sure sounds like Walsh is ready to announce a primary challenge to Trump:
https://twitter.com/walshfreedom/sta...895315456?s=21
I once had a boss with a similar trait, i.e. his position was the same as that of the last person he spoke to. I suspect you're right and those two re-aligned things, at least for the moment...but there is clearly more than a seed of doubt, and I remain confident that victory will be declared, though perhaps not for a few more months.
Sure sounds like Walsh is ready to announce a primary challenge to Trump:
https://twitter.com/walshfreedom/sta...895315456?s=21
Soooooo, how did the guy that said, "On November 8th, I'm voting for Trump. On November 9th, if Trump loses, I'm grabbing my musket. You in?" go from that to to maybe primary-ing Trump?
He's got an interesting background, I'll give him that. He worked with inner city Chicago youth early in his career doing social work before becoming a Tea Party darling. I'm not saying those two things are incompatible but they are unusual.
As for the first part, he (like Scaramucci and others) have repented and apologized. Take that for what it is worth.
Agree on the second part.
A challenge from the right of Trump would be much more difficult for Trump to deflect than from the Bill Welds of the world it seems to me. Even though it would have little to no chance of success, it would be interesting to watch. Let’s see if the Emperor is wearing clothes or not.
Have to disagree with you here. McConnell did his thing in 2016 and the Rs won the White House. R voters clearly "get" the Supreme Court, D voters not at all. I always think the next ruling will make them understand but it never does. Bush v. Gore didn't, Citizens United didn't, they just don't learn.
Trump's camp replies to Walsh running.
Ha!Asked to respond to Walsh's criticism of the president and decision to run, Trump's spokesman replied, "Whatever."
https://www.yahoo.com/news/1-joe-wal...133057033.html
Q "Why do you like Duke, you didn't even go there." A "Because my art school didn't have a basketball team."
There will be state GOP leadership groups that will elect not to have a primary and pledge all their delegates to Trump. Will be interesting to see if that results in some kind of court battle.
Why are you wasting time here when you could be wasting it by listening to the latest episode of the DBR Podcast?
Walsh announcement video. This will add some spice to the gumbo:
https://twitter.com/walshfreedom/sta...655551489?s=21
The question will be whether he can get some momentum going. This could be a real problem for Trump — a challenge from someone firmly rising from the base itself.
I found an article in the NY Post (where I sometimes check for NY Giants stories) which is generally a very Trump friendly paper, owned by Rupert...their reporter Nikki Schwab states that the question about whether Trump was re-thinking his China trade policy was asked in three different ways to ensure that the question was clear to him...thereby casting doubt on the assertion by aides subsequently that he did not understand the question...
I suppose that depends on the state party rules. If it's allowed within the rules, I can't see a court battle being successful.
That said, I think it puts the GOP in a VERY VERY BAD LIGHT. There will be no disagreement. There will be no alternative. The party will pick your candidate and you the voters will deal with it. Not a good look at all for a party trying to cast their opponents as communists.
The election is over. If Trump stops hurricanes from hitting the U.S., he'll carry every Atlantic Coast state:
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/polit...Fxv?li=BBnbfcL
Okay, enough nonsense. I've been brushed by a few hurricanes. They're a pain in the butt, but I'll take them over a radiation spewing storm any day.