Though Biden is probably not as sharp as he was a decade ago, speculating that he will be removed from office and/or be incapable of performing the job seems a bit much for this thread. That said, I think Biden's age has led most of us to say that Biden should pick a reasonably experienced VP who is capable of stepping in if necessary. The list of likely VP picks seems to reflect that belief.
Why are you wasting time here when you could be wasting it by listening to the latest episode of the DBR Podcast?
Kyle gets BUCKETS!
https://youtu.be/NJWPASQZqLc
IMO Kamala is the safest pick of the people in serious contention. Low risk, also relatively low potential for reward. Well-known to people compared to most others in contention. Bob Green has been saying she's too extreme for the last year – I honestly don't know where that comes from, it just seems he doesn't like her. Her positions are less to the left than many of the people who ran for the nomination (Warren, Sanders, Yang, Castro, some others). She has high favorability ratings among the Democratic base – not sure what the numbers are for the general population.
Perhaps you’re correct. I also don’t like Warren as the VP selection. As a conservative who cannot vote Republican in 2020, I assure you Biden can still lose my vote. I voted Libertarian in 2016 and could do it again in 2020. I suspect there are a significant number of conservatives who feel the same way.
My desire was for Biden to select Klobuchar but that train has left the station.
Bob Green
I hear you on all of this, including how moderate voters would prefer Klobuchar. I just don't see lumping in Kamala with Bernie and Warren in the "obviously too far left to have any chance of appealing to moderates" category. Like Acymetric said, I don't think the hard-core Bernie wing of the party even likes her at all.
Joe's been addressing things in a grandfatherly kind of way, and perhaps that a pretty good strategy right now. We have more than enough hostility right now.
Ok, this is totally "unpossible", but just as a Gedanken experiment, Biden did once mention that he might pick a Republican*, so what if he picked...
Nikki Haley?
She certain checks a lot of boxes as someone with executive and "international" (at least UN) experience (as well as being a minority!), so she has some Presidential possibilities. That ticket certainly could tempt a lot of never Trumpers and perhaps even a few Trumpers themselves. (Obv it's a non-starter for Dems, though...)
(* I suspect Joe wasn't really serious, but said this to make a point about his bi-partinship-iness and that he seriously does still believe there are Republicans who could be salvaged from Trump's orbit...)
Nikki is poised to launch for the Reps in 2024. And will be an intriguing candidate.
Honestly, I think Biden should choose a moderate who isn't as well known by the masses (i.e. didn't run in the primaries), but still is an experienced and fairly young politician. Senators, governor's, etc. Make an uncontroversial pick who doesn't garner much of a reaction. I think that's basically what Trump did with Pence, making a "safe" choice. I think Biden should want the race to be solely on Trump vs. Biden.
Yes, i agree with this. In some ways, you need a conservative to break some gender/race barriers, so I think she has a good shot (Margaret Thatcher, Nixon opening China, etc...even Angela Merkel and Barack Obama are pretty conservative leaders of more liberal parties)
In traditional times, she would be a formidable candidate. But I wonder if Trump's base will ever be able to stomach a traditional politician who makes measured, anodyne public statements even if they're very conservative in practice (e.g., Mike Pence). (Actually, Haley can sound pretty fire-brand-y at times, so maybe she'll be able to thread that needle with the new base of the Republican party...)