Here’s just one example.
New York City has almost total Democratic Party control.
They recently decided to defund their police department by $1,000,000,000, despite a substantial rise in city wide crime rates.
Here’s just one example.
New York City has almost total Democratic Party control.
They recently decided to defund their police department by $1,000,000,000, despite a substantial rise in city wide crime rates.
Can I just interject one thing? If it's off-limits then please feel free to delete it. I'm not trying to break any rules, I promise.
As a fellow-Floridian, I just want to say that Wheat's posts are an insight into how many, many Floridians think and feel about the upcoming Election. In that sense, he's giving you a snapshot into how a large portion of the State look at the election issues. And this is why I still insist, despite any polling to the contrary, that FL is going to be a coin-flip come Nov 3rd. I'll be shocked if either candidate wins the state by more than 2 percentage points. Absolutely shocked. Trump beat Clinton by only a little over 1%. I expect the same dynamic in November. Reject my Floridian insight at your own peril, prognosticators.
Edit: To add that OldPhilKap is exactly right - at least with many Florida voters.
Last edited by SouthernDukie; 07-07-2020 at 09:17 AM.
Some perspective, PLEASE. That's less than 10% of their budget. How is that unreasonable in these times? Everyone is taking a hit. Even Coach K.
That's the problem some have with your posts. They are ill-informed or deliberately lobbed into the crowd to incite angry replies.
https://cbcny.org/research/seven-fac...ut-nypd-budget
Definitely true, but the Democrats could frame the response according to the views of some voters, suburban or otherwise, that police response to facing reform is to stop doing their jobs. "Violence has increased because the police don't want to do their jobs unless they get to have everything their way. Let's make public safety and not overtime pay the priority of the police." There are a lot of police officers talking about holding back, on record. It wouldn't be a particularly hard response to gear up.
I appreciate the more detailed follow-up but if you read what I and many others wrote, you would recognize that "defund their police department," is a loaded term, even though it is very clear in this instance what it means. "Cut" would be a much better choice of words. And also acknowledge that a major part of the reason for this "cut" is that the city is running a huge deficit so is making vast cuts across the board (I am a New York City resident). Like almost every other city and state. Nuance is key here...
Sorry if I am testing the limits here. As a Duke public policy major, I like to think of this board as almost an extension of a public policy seminar. Professors would not allow for partisan comments, particularly if not really well defended. And if someone made a comment that mis-used a term or needed further explanation, a professor would call them out on it, in a professorial, respectful way.
I think it’s unbelievably presumptuous for you and Wheat to continue to propagate this self-proclaimed idea that you are somehow accurate spokespersons for and representatives of the political views of millions of Floridians. Says who, you and Wheat???
Please stop making this silly claim. It has gotten extremely old. Should every DBR poster start making such claims about massive portions of the electorate in the respective state in which they live? The two of you just need to stop this, period.
I wish more conservative minded people would post, I know you’re out there.
Violence in this country is a major concern, and will be one of the deciding issues in this election.
Just look at gun sales statistics, people understand the police just might not be there to protect them and are looking to protect themselves.
The Democratic Party is viewed as not being overly concerned by many voters.
Last edited by Wheat/"/"/"; 07-07-2020 at 09:35 AM. Reason: Clarity
Coach K on Kyle Singler - "What position does he play? ... He plays winner."
"Duke is never the underdog" - Quinn Cook
This is the whole point. "Defund the Police" doesn't mean "eliminate police." It means "reappropriation of police funds to address underlying causes."
Do you believe the only way to decrease crime is to have more police with better weapons? If so, you are voicing your position properly. But, if you think perhaps having police enforce laws is a good thing, but money towards mental health, financial assistance for desperate people, addiction programs, etc... would reduce the impetus behind the crime and reduce the need for police, then take a longer look at "Defund the Police."
Seriously, whoever named that policy needs to get a new job.
Because New York City has a $9 billion deficit. They have to cut everywhere. One could definitely argue that too high of a percentage of the cuts came from police. And one could argue the legitimacy of the $9 billion number, though it is agreed on by all that there is a huge deficit. So everything had to get cut.
I do not think it is at all out of bounds to say "crime and safety" will be a major issue during this campaign. It is certainly going to be a very big issue and perhaps that only one in recent days that resonates with folks besides Trump's base.
I think Wheat///'s position is that Democrat's are taking an analogous stance to Trump's COVID-19 testing strategy. "The more police we have, the more crime we find. So stop with all the police." As a CAMPAIGN FRIENDLY SLOGAN, "defund the police" is perhaps the worst slogan you could think of. It is ripe for political attack and ridicule regardless of the merits and good intent are behind the movement.