Results 1 to 20 of 20
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Raleigh, NC

    Three Clemson football players fail drug test


  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Deeetroit City
    unc players never have to take tests ...

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Raleigh
    Quote Originally Posted by BD80 View Post
    unc players never have to take tests ...
    Good thing they won't miss a bowl game this season...
    [redacted] them and the horses they rode in on.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Winston-Salem, NC
    Bama also suspended 3 players including a starter, but I don't think it will affect them at all:

    http://www.espn.com/college-football...wn-orange-bowl

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Norfolk, VA
    Dexter Lawrence not being available to play is a big deal. He anchors the middle of Clemson's defensive line.
    Bob Green

  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Winston-Salem, NC
    Quote Originally Posted by Bob Green View Post
    Dexter Lawrence not being available to play is a big deal. He anchors the middle of Clemson's defensive line.
    Agreed. But after reading Dabo's comments in the article, I believe Dabo that these players probably did nothing intentionally to juice. Sounds like they did something like buy the wrong Monster drink at the 7-11. But they probably won't be able to play unless the B-sample clears them, which seems unlikely.

    Vegas still has Clemson -13 FWIW

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Winston-Salem, NC
    Quote Originally Posted by richardjackson199 View Post
    Bama also suspended 3 players including a starter, but I don't think it will affect them at all:

    http://www.espn.com/college-football...wn-orange-bowl
    And on that note, Tua said he expects to be 100% and not limited at all.

    Vegas has Bama -14

  8. #8
    Quote Originally Posted by richardjackson199 View Post
    Agreed. But after reading Dabo's comments in the article, I believe Dabo that these players probably did nothing intentionally to juice. Sounds like they did something like buy the wrong Monster drink at the 7-11. But they probably won't be able to play unless the B-sample clears them, which seems unlikely.

    Vegas still has Clemson -13 FWIW
    Are B-samples rarely dispositive? (I'm asking, I don't know).

  9. #9
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Winston-Salem, NC
    Quote Originally Posted by HereBeforeCoachK View Post
    Are B-samples rarely dispositive? (I'm asking, I don't know).
    I have no clue about the B-sample likelihood of coming back negative after a positive A sample.

    I interpretted the ESPN article and Mark Schlabach reporting that Clemson expects not to have these players available. But no clue what the percentage likelihood of that would be.

    Maybe not relevant, but when doctors test for something like HIV, the first test is different than the second test. The first test is very sensitive, basically meaning that it probably won't miss true HIV if it's there. But the test could be a false positive.

    So they get a second different test which has high "specificity." This basically means that if it says it's positive, it's almost definitely positive for true HIV. But they wouldn't do that test first because it wouldn't catch more true HIV cases because the test is not as sensitive. If someone has true HIV and gets tested, you don't want to miss it. So you first use a highly "sensitive" test for screening and then a second highly specific test for confirmation (only if the first test was positive).

    Sensitivity and specificity are concepts they love to always put on doctors' and medical students' board exams.

    But with this A-sample B-sample test thing for performance enhancing drugs, I have no clue if it's using the same concept. Maybe the B sample is just a separate urine sample that undergoes the same test as the A-sample? In that case, I would think it's fairly likely for the B sample to also be positive. If the B-sample test indeed undergoes a separate test with higher specificity and lower sensitivity, then there is a higher chance that test would come back negative.

    That's all I know - I really know nothing about the B-sample test in this case.
    Last edited by richardjackson199; 12-25-2018 at 09:15 AM.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Raleigh
    Maybe Clemson should have a buncha non-athletes submit urine for testing, that way, if some other regular students test positive...

    Nah, never mind. Nothing like that would *ever* work.
    [redacted] them and the horses they rode in on.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Winston Salem, NC
    Quote Originally Posted by devildeac View Post
    Maybe Clemson should have a buncha non-athletes submit urine for testing, that way, if some other regular students test positive...

    Nah, never mind. Nothing like that would *ever* work.
    I must spread some sporkz. Post of the day that cracked me up. A big "GODUKE" devildeac. Merry Christmas.

  12. #12
    It must be tough for Carolina fans to have their school brought up in conversation whenever there is talk of cheating.

    With that thought, Merry Christmas to all and a happy 9f.

  13. #13
    Quote Originally Posted by PackMan97 View Post
    It must be tough for Carolina fans to have their school brought up in conversation whenever there is talk of cheating.
    When discussing anything that can be quantified, it is only natural to compare against the largest such existing example. To date, uNC cheating reigns supreme.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Raleigh
    Quote Originally Posted by 75Crazie View Post
    When discussing anything that can be quantified, it is only natural to compare against the largest such existing example. To date, uNC cheating reigns supreme.
    Maybe they'll hang a banner...
    [redacted] them and the horses they rode in on.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Quote Originally Posted by devildeac View Post
    Maybe Clemson should have a buncha non-athletes submit urine for testing, that way, if some other regular students test positive...

    Nah, never mind. Nothing like that would *ever* work.
    Very well said - made me laugh this holiday morning. Love how no mention is made of any other school but the inference is easy. Merry Xmas to all!

  16. #16
    Quote Originally Posted by devildeac View Post
    Maybe Clemson should have a buncha non-athletes submit urine for testing, that way, if some other regular students test positive...

    Nah, never mind. Nothing like that would *ever* work.
    Exactly. If all students had access to the same 7-11 ...

    Do some Monster energy drinks really have stuff in them that would cause a failed urine test? I had the feeling that was just one of those empty excuses.

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Undisclosed
    Alberto Contador blamed meat for his bad dope result in the TdF a few years ago. So maybe it was just hormones in the cattle from which their steaks came.

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Raleigh, NC
    Not having Dexter on that d-line is a big deal for Clemson. When Dabo called him to tell him, Dexter thought coach was pulling his leg. He was surprised when coach told him he wasn't kidding.

  19. #19
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Winston-Salem, NC

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    My son played against Dexter Lawrence in high school.

    I don’t know him, I’ll just say I am disappointed in that it has been fun for me to see kids my son played with and against as DI players.

    Being on the outside, its hard to know what the truth is beyond the facts of two failed drug tests.

Similar Threads

  1. Football: 13 Academic All ACC players!
    By johnb in forum Elizabeth King Forum
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 02-11-2015, 02:13 PM
  2. Kudos to the football players (97%)
    By GODUKEGO in forum Elizabeth King Forum
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 10-28-2010, 02:42 PM
  3. The test for ACC football
    By Olympic Fan in forum Elizabeth King Forum
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 08-07-2010, 12:07 PM
  4. FSU-20+ Football Players Suspended
    By ikiru36 in forum Elizabeth King Forum
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 12-19-2007, 09:14 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •