Cam’s Freshman season on the offensive end is reminding me of Kennard’s. He has great games followed by clunkers. You can see the shooting skills but consistency is an issue and no one is sure why. Unlike Luke, he can be a difference maker on D as he is long and tends to get his hands on a lot of balls. He will get better with time but it is nice that AOC or Jack can come in as needed. Cam is brilliant player but has not figured out how to be consistent. It makes RJ’s and Zion’s starts even that more impressive.
Saw that too. I wonder if it was because of Tre out he wanted Cam and RJ to bring up the ball more. Or long upcoming layoff permitted extra min. Lastly it could be to reward a great overall game and get him to 30 pts. RJ is such a special player. I think I read he has more points than any freshman at this point in the season. He’s become more efficient in the last few games and if he’d just hit his #(*)&#$ FTs! Well that would be unfair.
The ceiling is the roof
I too have been watching Duke for over 50 years. I have very fond memories of players and past teams and would not want to have to chose absolute favorites.
However this team is really fun to watch. My interest in Duke basketball was on the decline as the OADS meant less connection to the players and the basketball was just not as good as the past.
Interest is back at a high level now.
SoCal
Regarding Jack White.
I watched him even more closely last night then usual. It wasn't hard, I've been a fan of his from the beginning.
What I saw, however, was surprising. Jack seems to have a preternatural ability to not only be well positioned for rebounds, he also has the ability to time his jumps perfectly to come down with the ball. When the ball hangs on the rim, he isn't jumping with everyone else. He is jumping as others are coming down. It's like he naturally calculates the carom of the ball in real time and jumps at just the right time and in the right direction.
He isn't jumping higher, necessarily. He's jumping better!
I agree with Coach K - right now, Alex is playing the best basketball we've seen him play. He's getting better on defense - from pretty weak to at least passable, and having other strong defenders around him means that when he gambles, the D can recover. He has always had good size and athleticism for a collegiate guard, and he's got a nice shot. The reason I was comparing him to Cam was because in the posts I was replying to, prior posters had suggested that Alex should be starting over Cam. Regardless of whether he's starting, he's clearly in the rotation, and if Cam continues to struggle with his 3 pointers, Alex is a potent alternative off the bench to fill that role.
My point about Jack's hustle wasn't about his rebounding - sorry if that wasn't clear. His rebounding is excellent, as many have noted. My point was regarding his perimeter defense. Again, this was comparing him to Cam in response to other posters. Jack is effective guarding on the perimeter even though he isn't as long or quick as Cam, and I think he's doing so through smart positioning, hustle, and good timing. He seems to do a good job of picking when to go over or under a screener. His timing and jumping has allowed him to block a ball from behind even after getting beat to the basket. He's really playing great ball right now in just about every way we need him to. Like I said before - a real glue guy.
Your point about fast breaks is valid. It's one aspect of this team that can be absolutely elite. It's already very, very good. Even elite fast break teams are going to screw one up now and then, so I'm not too worried about it, as long as we don't have too many 1-on-4 fast break attempts...
JBDuke
Andre Dawkins: “People ask me if I can still shoot, and I ask them if they can still breathe. That’s kind of the same thing.”
Not sure about that. In games decided by fewer than 20 points, he's averaging 3 mpg.
Maybe, but I think you're selling Cam way short. After his first 10 collegiate games, Luke Kennard was shooting 25.6% from three. After his first 10 collegiate games, Cam is shooting 39.2% from three. Huuuuuuge difference.
Small sample size. So far, that's just two games - Auburn and Gonzaga. We'll see how things progress, as Coach K frequently tightens up the rotations. Will Alex, the second big (Javin or Marques), Jack, and Jordan continue to to average 10+ minutes? Maybe, but I doubt it. Jordan's time probably depends on how much of a minutes burden Tre can bear. Alex is probably the next most likely candidate to lose minutes, unless Marques goes back into a funk or Javin returns to fouling at unsustainable rates.
JBDuke
Andre Dawkins: “People ask me if I can still shoot, and I ask them if they can still breathe. That’s kind of the same thing.”
I get that it's just two games, but if the past is an accurate predictor of the future then those two games will more accurately represent the post-January, non-blowout rotation than the eight 20+ point blowouts in which Alex and Jordan have played. Absent injury or extreme foul trouble, history suggests K is probably only going to give rotation minutes to 7 guys. Alex is the 8th guy and Jordan is the 9th. To me, the math is pretty clear.
Now, if K starts playing Zion-at-center lineups for half the game, obviating the need to have two "true" centers in the rotation, and Alex passes Marques or Javin on the depth chart, then Alex would be in the rotation and the "new" 8th man won't. But we haven't seen any evidence of that so far.
As a comparison, I went back and looked at the 2000-01 team's first 10 games. Seven of those were 20+ blowouts, three were not.
In the seven blowouts, Nick Horvath played 10+ mpg (in 5 games before he got hurt), Andre Sweet played 11+ mpg, Matt Christensen played almost 9 mpg, Andre Buckner played around 5 mpg, Reggie Love played 3+ mpg (in 3 games after football season ended) and JD Simpson played around 3 mpg. In the three closer games, those six players combined for 7 minutes total (2+ mpg for the lot of them). Which set of games do you think more accurately predicted the non-blowout rotation after January 1?
I would be surprised to see Jack move into the starting lineup unless we have a significant injury. He can come in off the bench for any of the starters and fill the role of 4 of them (Tre being the exception). It makes him the perfect 6th man for this team and my early prediction for conference 6th man of the year (if there is such an award - didn’t feel like looking it up).