Originally Posted by
Tooold
The way I understood the overturned call in the Duke game was that Coach K was allowed to challenge the charging call specifically because it was 1) during the last two minutes and 2) there was a stoppage of play. Without those two conditions, he could not have challenged. If he had lost the challenge, he would have forfeited a time out. (presumably Louisville had no such challenge option since they were out of time outs.) So if the rule is changed for goaltending, I would assume the same conditions would apply. If there is a non-call, there might not be a stoppage of play. It couldn’t be handled the way a two/three point review is handled because the coach has to challenge. Unless you are suggesting that all possible goaltending calls and non-calls should be reviewed.
Refs can initiate the review on their own in the last two minutes, or the coach can challenge. Was it officially stated anywhere that Coach K challenged the charge call? I didn't have sound when I was watching, and haven't read anything one way or the other today.
Here's the replay rule for the restricted area (Rule 11-2.1.e.2):
2. In the last two minutes of the second period and of any extra period(s),
to determine if a secondary defender was inside or outside the
Restricted Area Arc when an official has stopped the game and has
made either a blocking call or a player control/charging call. A head
coach may request a monitor review after a call has been made to
determine if a secondary defender was inside or outside the Restricted
Area. A timeout shall be charged to the coach if the original call is
confirmed.