Originally Posted by
Reilly
That would help us.
I guess we want Duke to win out and these other teams to lose as many as possible:
Syr 8-2 (5-2) ... @ND ... @BC
BC 7-3 (4-2) ... @FSU ... Syr
UVa 7-3 (4-2) ... @GT ... @VT
Duke 7-3 (3-3) ... @Clemson ... WFU
NCSU 6-3 (3-3) ... @L'ville ... @UNC ... ECU
Pitt 6-4 (5-1) ... @WFU ... @Mia
So, root for
... ND over Syracuse
... FSU over BC
... GT over UVA
... VT over UVA
... L'ville over NCSU
...
UNC over NCSU [ugh - but if it means Duke to Nashville against P5 rather than to Shreveport against non-P5, I'd hope for the State loss*]
... ECU over NCSU
... WFU over Pitt
... Mia over Pitt
* - Per the CFB rooting moral principle of double effect, this is OK (maybe). The principle of double effect in the moral tradition in CFB rooting teaches that one may perform a good CFB rooting action even if it is foreseen that a bad effect will arise only if four conditions are met: 1) The act itself must be good. 2) The only thing that one can intend is the good act, not the foreseen but unintended bad effect. 3) The good effect cannot arise from the bad effect; otherwise, one would do evil to achieve good. 4) The unintended but foreseen bad effect cannot be disproportionate to the good being performed.
[#3 and #4 get a little shaky.]
It certainly could happen given their history of nocturia as I've posted somewhere else but I'd never cheer for this scenario. Never.
Last edited by devildeac; 11-12-2018 at 10:11 AM.
[redacted] them and the horses they rode in on.