Originally Posted by
JasonEvans
I hear you, CDu about Johnson's advanced stats and per 40/per 100 stats being strong but there is another stat that doesn't match with those numbers... minutes played. I know he was limited by injuries in the middle of the season, but his playing time when healthy wasn't indicative of a guy that Coach K thought was a really good player. K usually plays his best players as much as possible, to a fault. But Johnson only played 30+ minutes in 2 of his 13 games (Coppin St and @Pitt). Even when healthy, he was more likely to play less than 20 than he was to play more than 30. He wasn't even a starter in his final 3 games for Duke.
Compare that to DJ Steward, who played 30+ minutes in 15 games and didn't have a single game where he played less than 22 minutes... or Matthew Hurt who had only one game all year where he played less than 26 minutes. Heck, another wildly inconsistent and somewhat disappointing freshman, Jeremy Roach, seemed to play more consistent minutes than JJ did.
How does the fact that K did not want him on the floor all that much jive with your observation that JJ was better than guys who were out there 30+ minutes per game virtually every time out like Stanley, Trent, Rivers, Ingram, Tatum, Winslow, Barrett, and Bagley? Bottom line -- K just didn't see things from Johnson that made him want to maximize Johnson's minutes. That speaks volumes to me about how Johnson impacted winning and losing versus the many other guys you cited.