To be fair- Moore is a sweet stroke away from having an NBA future. He is still only 19- turns 20 in Sept. Baldwin turns 19 in Nov. Moore is getting better and could have a breakout season. I am not yet sure of his NBA limit.
As for who is better- yes Baldwin is the clear NBA prospect- but he just had a serious ankle injury and has a lot to learn about the college game. He would likely start over Moore because he is a tough matchup.
For all we know, Baldwin will give up as many points as he scores. He-like many freshmen - is a complete question mark on the defensive end.
Is Baldwin actually functional at multiple positions? Can he handle the ball enough to be a 2? (Moore can) Can he stay in front of college 2s and 3s? (Moore can) Is he strong enough to defend and/or rebound from the 4 spot? (Moore is)
It’s absolutely not a foregone conclusion that he will be a more valuable player than Moore next year.
^ perhaps true (I respectfully disagree vis a vis Moore) but Baldwin was K's favorite player in the class. Sorry we missed on him, next play.
I agree with you here, Sage, and I don't think Coach K would have had the success he has had if he had gone to a "lesser" school. No doubt Duke University was very, very lucky to hire Coach K back in 1981 (and it was obviously a huge gamble at the time; I'm not even sure Tom Butters knew how successful he would become) BUT I also think Coach K was VERY lucky to get the Duke head coaching job. If he had taken the Iowa State job (which, I believe, he was also offered at that time), would he have had a hall-of-fame career; won multiple national championships with over 1000 total wins, etc. ? Not a snowball's chance in hell, IMHO. If you believe, as I do, that recruiting is a big part of being successful at the top levels of Div. 1 college basketball, then no doubt Coach K leveraged all of the advantages of Duke University (and his own program) to bring in some of the best HS b-ball players over the decades. I just don't think this would have been possible at a less desirable school. I analogize it's like being a recruiter for Goldman Sachs vs. working for a small, third-rate investment firm. It's MUCH easier to recruit the best talent to GS than the small firm.
Indeed, any concern some may have had (not me) about too many bodies should be mitigated. I agree that we only need eight, but one must account for the Foot Fairy who enjoys life on the Duke campus...
Hoops these days reminds of when I managed a softball team many years ago. You need 10 players, you'd like a few spares for no-shows (work conflicts, etc), yet EVERYONE wanted to play, it was a pain in the butt...the days of hoop kids biding their time on the bench is pretty much done as well except for the lower ranked recruits teams like Duke only get in very modest numbers.
Seems like we have a good-ish number of bodies at this point, fingers crossed.
His defense is wild
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XNpby5OldqM
I don't know what you are doing right now, but if you aren't listening to the DBR Podcast, you're doing it wrong.
I believe you may have missed my point, which was the suggestion that Duke might have enough warm bodies. Given Duke's recent propensity towards injuries, well, you can figure out the rest.
And, yes, the references to curses and fairies and such are a little tongue in cheek. A little.
Thanks for the link. I think that was in 2019? Griffin looked to have very good awareness on defense as he blocked shots from off the ball. I will be anxious to see how he guards his own man and how he handles switches in Duke's man2man. If that was 2019, I'm pretty sure AJ has added some strength since then, however he looked to be pretty stout in that video.
GoDuke!
Duke has some fun combinations of players for next season. AJ and Wendell are going to be interesting to watch as both are big and long and could guard 2-4. The length is fun as it could generate a lot of deflections and open-court turnovers. Then in the frontcourt there's Paolo and Mark. Depending on the matchup, those two could guard either frontcourt position. Of course, we'll want to see Mark close to the rim on defense as much as possible.
The really interesting question is how versatile Paolo is on defense. He showed impressive lateral movement and defensive acumen in the 1-on-1 drill during the Iverson Classic. He also showed his ability to jump passing lanes on the perimeter during scrimmage and game action. Can he really defend out to the perimeter and not get burned in the pick and roll? If he can, then things could get really interesting. I don't think we've seen enough to know if Paolo can defend the pick and roll. It's something I'll be watching early on.
There is a strong chance that Duke, for every game, has a size advantage from the 2-5. Roach is a pretty small dude, but AJ is massive for a 2/3 as is Moore. Banchero, while not heavy, is tall, long, and powerful for a 4. And I assume Williams will add 20lbs to his wiry frame in the off-season to match his enormous 7'0" frame and 7'0" wingspan.
Sprinkle in Keels (tall and heavy for a 2), John (weighs 255lbs), and Blakes (6'3" for a PG), and this is a biiiiiiiiiiig team all around. The only bench player who is likely to give up size is Baker (he isn't quick and suspect he isn't going to guard the 2/3 very much).
Criticism may not be agreeable, but it is necessary. It fulfils the same function as pain in the human body. It calls attention to an unhealthy state of things. - Winston Churchill
President of the "Nolan Smith Should Have His Jersey in The Rafters" Club
Duke has been pretty healthy the last two seasons - certainly no vigil's as far as I can recall. And yeah I'm not counting Johnson's foot "injury" - YMMV.
I would argue that Johnson's injury/"injury" was pretty impactful to our results this past season. For a young team trying to figure out their identity, the in-and-out-and-in-and-out nature of Johnson's season was a pretty big drag on our team's development.
I think we would have been unquestionably better had we either had him available all season or had we never had him at all. But the foot vigil as it played out was a big deal.