Page 19 of 67 FirstFirst ... 9171819202129 ... LastLast
Results 361 to 380 of 1325
  1. #361
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Undisclosed
    Quote Originally Posted by jimsumner View Post
    I think your write. Its what their doing.
    Literally.

  2. #362
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Winston’Salem
    Listening to the British Open radio broadcast, with British announcers, has rekindled my great fondness for one very small word:


    “Wee.”
    "Amazing what a minute can do."

  3. #363
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Raleigh, NC
    Quote Originally Posted by Tripping William View Post
    Listening to the British Open radio broadcast, with British announcers, has rekindled my great fondness for one very small word:


    “Wee.”
    Just a wee breeze.

  4. #364
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Winston’Salem
    Quote Originally Posted by jimsumner View Post
    Just a wee breeze.
    Makes me want a wee dram. Or a wee heavy.
    "Amazing what a minute can do."

  5. #365
    Quote Originally Posted by dudog84 View Post
    I really like the work pique.

    It's fun to say.
    You can have a fit of pique.
    Something can pique your interest.

    A question for the more literary knowledegable on the board...I've been seeing "peaked my interest" a lot lately, and from supposedly educated people. Is this now acceptable? It's clearly not a typo, or the product of hurried typing (which I sometimes give people the benefit of the doubt for when they screw up their/they're, for example...but no excuse for screwing up 'there' in that combo).
    Apparently piqued still used 10x as often as peaked and it's only at stage 1 on the language change index:

    https://books.google.com/books?id=2x...0pique&f=false

  6. #366
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Chesapeake, VA.
    I think there are way too many people these days who don't know that "piqued" my interest is correct, and just spell the word phonetically. This particular error happens to be one of my linguistic pet peeves.

  7. #367
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    On the Road to Nowhere
    Quote Originally Posted by Reilly View Post
    Apparently piqued still used 10x as often as peaked and it's only at stage 1 on the language change index:

    https://books.google.com/books?id=2x...0pique&f=false
    Where do you guys find this stuff?!? I appreciate that you do.

    However, I think they're wrong at 10:1. I believe I see 'peaked' more often than 'piqued'. Note in the reference that 2 of the citations are from 1996, I think it has gotten worse since then. Also notable that those citations are the Village Voice and the Boston Herald, both of which should know better.

  8. #368
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Washington, DC area
    Quote Originally Posted by rsvman View Post
    I think there are way too many people these days who don't know that "piqued" my interest is correct, and just spell the word phonetically. This particular error happens to be one of my linguistic pet peeves.
    Yeah, I get tired of that, too...

    -jk

  9. #369
    Quote Originally Posted by dudog84 View Post
    Where do you guys find this stuff?!? I appreciate that you do.

    However, I think they're wrong at 10:1. I believe I see 'peaked' more often than 'piqued'. Note in the reference that 2 of the citations are from 1996, I think it has gotten worse since then. Also notable that those citations are the Village Voice and the Boston Herald, both of which should know better.
    I checked my hardcover "Garner's Modern American Usage" (3rd ed.; copyright 2009) and it's listed as stage 1 on the language-change index. That said, 2009 is almost a decade ago.

    There are 5 stages to the language-change index. 1: rejected; 2: widely shunned; 3: widespread but ...; 4: ubiquitous but ...; 5: fully accepted.

    Garner lists analogies in ten areas for the 5-stage index. In school grading, 1: F; 2: D; 3: C; 4: B; 5: A. In etiquette, 1: audible farting; 2: audible belching; 3: overloud talking; 4: elbows on table; 5: refined.

    Next time you encounter "peaked my interest", ask the user why they are audibly farting (linguistically).

  10. #370
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    On the Road to Nowhere
    Quote Originally Posted by Reilly View Post
    I checked my hardcover "Garner's Modern American Usage" (3rd ed.; copyright 2009) and it's listed as stage 1 on the language-change index. That said, 2009 is almost a decade ago.

    There are 5 stages to the language-change index. 1: rejected; 2: widely shunned; 3: widespread but ...; 4: ubiquitous but ...; 5: fully accepted.

    Garner lists analogies in ten areas for the 5-stage index. In school grading, 1: F; 2: D; 3: C; 4: B; 5: A. In etiquette, 1: audible farting; 2: audible belching; 3: overloud talking; 4: elbows on table; 5: refined.

    Next time you encounter "peaked my interest", ask the user why they are audibly farting (linguistically).
    That's funny!

    Re 'peaked', put me down for widely shunned.

    Re myself, put me down for elbows on table. That I was a 4 makes me quite proud of myself.

  11. #371
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Greenville, SC
    Quote Originally Posted by Reilly View Post
    I checked my hardcover "Garner's Modern American Usage" (3rd ed.; copyright 2009) and it's listed as stage 1 on the language-change index. That said, 2009 is almost a decade ago.

    There are 5 stages to the language-change index. 1: rejected; 2: widely shunned; 3: widespread but ...; 4: ubiquitous but ...; 5: fully accepted.

    Garner lists analogies in ten areas for the 5-stage index. In school grading, 1: F; 2: D; 3: C; 4: B; 5: A. In etiquette, 1: audible farting; 2: audible belching; 3: overloud talking; 4: elbows on table; 5: refined.

    Next time you encounter "peaked my interest", ask the user why they are audibly farting (linguistically).
    If I belch in the forest and no one hears it...


    then why bother?

  12. #372
    I just caught up on a month of this thread and was gratified to discover the amount of overlap in others' disliked words with my own list.

    Here are a few more words that I do like:

    veldt
    bivouac
    paroxysm

    Upon consideration of the last one, it occurs to me that sometimes I like or dislike a word in part due to association with a particular experience. I remember learning "paroxysm" after searching for a word to describe something a cute girl did while we were in high school. During an assembly in the auditorium, she noticed I was sitting in the row behind her, turned around, and shouted "I love you!" at me.

  13. #373
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Halifax, Nova Scotia
    I assume brouhaha has already been mentioned as a great word, but if not it should have been, IMO.

  14. #374
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Raleigh
    Quote Originally Posted by NSDukeFan View Post
    I assume brouhaha has already been mentioned as a great word, but if not it should have been, IMO.
    Did you mean brewhaha?

    [redacted] them and the horses they rode in on.

  15. #375
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Undisclosed
    Quote Originally Posted by devildeac View Post
    Did you mean brewhaha?

    I thought it was BrewHaüsHaüs.

  16. #376
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Raleigh
    Quote Originally Posted by OldPhiKap View Post
    I thought it was BrewHaüsHaüs.
    Even better. With the umlaut, too. Very impressive.
    [redacted] them and the horses they rode in on.

  17. #377
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Halifax, Nova Scotia
    Quote Originally Posted by devildeac View Post
    Did you mean brewhaha?

    I assume that would be a funny get together over beers?

  18. #378
    I hate the words blessed and blessing. Not sure why but I suppose it reminds me of people thinking God when they hit a homerun or win an Oscar.

  19. #379
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Raleigh
    Quote Originally Posted by NSDukeFan View Post
    I assume that would be a funny get together over beers?
    We should send that to one of the on-line and/or in-print dictionaries as a "new" word.
    [redacted] them and the horses they rode in on.

  20. #380
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Undisclosed
    Quote Originally Posted by devildeac View Post
    We should send that to one of the on-line and/or in-print dictionaries as a "new" word.
    Related -- I'm waiting for someone to post a downloadable, 3-D printer IPA. Someone needs to get on that pronto.

Similar Threads

  1. 11,875 Words
    By mr. synellinden in forum Elizabeth King Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 02-13-2013, 04:57 PM
  2. A few new words
    By cf-62 in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 03-31-2012, 09:14 AM
  3. 1,000 words
    By CameronBornAndBred in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 08-16-2008, 07:06 PM
  4. Tell you what I dislike most about this NCAA men's tournament...
    By Kewlswim in forum Elizabeth King Forum
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 03-25-2007, 08:20 PM
  5. Duke Dislike, part 14: the coach
    By johnb in forum Elizabeth King Forum
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 03-21-2007, 02:17 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •