Page 2 of 7 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 122
  1. #21
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    New York City
    Quote Originally Posted by Troublemaker View Post
    If you look back through the years using this link https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_o...r_participants

    ...I think you'll see that it's not that rare for 3-seeds or lower to be in the title game.

    It's been the case 50% of the time since 2000 by my count.
    Sure. But how many of those times was it guaranteed by the start of the sweet 16? Possibly never.

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Mary's Place
    Quote Originally Posted by luburch View Post
    Trying to decide who to roll with in survivor. Waffling between Loyola and Gonzaga
    Gonzaga is boring without that big Polish sasquatch they had last year. Gotta roll with Gryffindor and Sister Jean!! How is this a hard choice?

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Atlanta
    We are 3-3 over the last 10 years in the sweet sixteen game. Nova, Oregon, and Arizona are the 3 losses. Victories over Michigan State, Utah, and Purdue.

    in the the E8 game after those 3 victories we are 2-1. One loss was to Louisville. Both victories led to Championships.


    As far as I can tell we have only played one ACC foe in the tournament before Friday. It was a Final Four win over Maryland in 2001. We've played now ACC teams a bunch but not when they were conference foes.
    Duke is 2-0 over Cuse in the tournament. 66' and 98'

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    San Francisco
    Quote Originally Posted by robed deity View Post
    Looking at kenpom numbers, Duke faced #'s 2,7,8, and 15. Admittedly, these are post tournament. But if anything, that seems like a relatively tough road.
    Yeah, the "easy" path to the title is a quick way for fans of other teams to try to diminish winning the NCAAT, which is difficult no matter who you are. I think people point to 2015 because Duke faced a team that generally hasn't gotten a lot of national media attention (Utah) and a team that, rightly or wrongly, had a reputation for flaming out in the tournament and is not from a major conference (Gonzaga). In reality, those two teams were excellent. Duke did catch a break by being on the opposite side of the bracket from Wiscy/Kentucky and therefore getting to play a Spartan team that was clearly not as good. But, hey, sometimes it happens like that.

    People said the same thing about Duke's 2010 title run, which I think was even harder. Duke did get a little lucky by facing a Purdue team in the Sweet 16 that had lost its best player (Robbie Hummell) to knee injury. But other than that, Duke had a really tough road. I remember being nervous about facing California in the second round . . . a team that was 14th in KenPom, had a scary-good offense. That was a Sweet 16-level test that Duke passed with flying colors in the second round. Duke even had to play two de facto away games in that run, including beating Baylor in Houston and then beating Butler in Butler's hometown. While all the media attention was focused on a potential Duke-UK battle in the semi-final, people forgot that West Virginia had been just as good as Kentucky throughout most of the season even if the Mountaineers didn't have the same name recognition. Some might recall that there were many who thought WVU should've been given the #1 seed that went to Duke. The fact that Duke beat the crap out of California and WVU didn't mean that Duke's path was easy. It just meant that Duke was really good.

    That said, Duke's path to the Elite Eight this year really is about as "easy" as we could have hoped. We had a reasonable 2/15 game. We faced one of the worst 7-seeds in the second round. And we will face the worst team remaining in the tournament in the Sweet 16. Nothing is given, of course. Duke really needs to take care of business. But I wouldn't sweat it when people who claim that Duke's path has been "easy," so far. It is, quite frankly, exactly as we fans would have designed it if we had been given a chance. Still gotta win the games on the court, though!
    Who needs a moral victory when you can have a real one?

  5. #25
    Quote Originally Posted by COYS View Post
    Yeah, the "easy" path to the title is a quick way for fans of other teams to try to diminish winning the NCAAT, which is difficult no matter who you are.
    Yeah, it can make sense to complain about an "easy" path to a particular round, but it never makes sense to say that about the champion.

    In any given year, maybe there's a team whose opening pod was full of over-seeded late-season collapsers, or maybe carnage in another part of the region made for an "easy" route to the final four. But once a team wins a championship? All that talk should go out the door. Everybody lost to somebody who lost to somebody who eventually lost to the champion. That's the beauty of the bracket. You think their route was easy? Well then, you should have beaten one of those "easy" teams.

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Cary, NC
    I think the year that people complain about Duke’s path was 2010 because we didn’t have to face Kentucky and then played Butler in the final. Nobody remembers that that game was played ten minutes from Butler’s campus, or that they lost their best player and then went back to the Finals the following year, or that we also had to face Baylor in Houston in an earlier round.

    I’ve already heard CHeat fans complaining that we get to play Syracuse in our next game. They forget that two years ago they played a double digit Syracuse team in the Final Four!

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Durham
    Quote Originally Posted by UrinalCake View Post
    I think the year that people complain about Duke’s path was 2010 because we didn’t have to face Kentucky and then played Butler in the final. Nobody remembers that that game was played ten minutes from Butler’s campus, or that they lost their best player and then went back to the Finals the following year, or that we also had to face Baylor in Houston in an earlier round.

    I’ve already heard CHeat fans complaining that we get to play Syracuse in our next game. They forget that two years ago they played a double digit Syracuse team in the Final Four!
    They just lost to a tx AM team which didn't even get votes in the last AP poll. As I said. wrestling with pigs.
    April 1

  8. #28
    Quote Originally Posted by Wander View Post
    Has there ever been a region where the 1, 2, 3, and 4 seed all miss the Sweet 16?
    No, there has not. According to CBS yesterday.

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Rochester, NY
    Quote Originally Posted by Troublemaker View Post
    Nah. Too many good teams left on that side of the bracket who, in a single-elimination tournament, can certainly win one game for the championship.
    Yes indeed. If we take the KenPom numbers, there is only a one-quarter chance of even seeing the 'de-facto championship' game (Duke v Villanova). Many a slip 'twixt cup and lip.

  10. #30
    Quote Originally Posted by -jk View Post
    courtesy of Bovada:

    2018 NCAA Championship - Odds to Win
    Duke 13/4
    Villanova 9/2
    Gonzaga 7/1
    Kentucky 7/1
    Michigan 8/1
    Kansas 17/2
    Purdue 16/1
    West Virginia 16/1
    Texas Tech 22/1
    Clemson 25/1
    Nevada 25/1
    Texas A&M 25/1
    Kansas State 28/1
    Florida State 40/1
    Loyola Chicago 50/1
    Syracuse 66/1

    Regional Odds
    Odds to win the Midwest Region
    Duke 2/3
    Kansas 2/1
    Clemson 8/1
    Syracuse 18/1

    Odds to win the West Region
    Gonzaga 7/5
    Michigan 7/4
    Texas A&M 4/1
    Florida State 8/1

    Odds to win the South Region
    Kentucky 5/6
    Nevada 7/2
    Kansas State 9/2
    Loyola Chicago 11/2

    Odds to Win the East Region
    Villanova 1/1
    West Virginia 15/4
    Purdue 4/1
    Texas Tech 9/2
    You left out the Holes’ odds😸

  11. #31
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Raleigh, NC
    Just wanted to give you all a heads up. Anyone that's planning on going to any of the sweet sixteen games keep in mind that they have instituted a dress code this year centered around footwear. Sneakers, flats, boots, dress shoes, sandals, all OK but...no Heels.

    Thank you, thank you! I'll be here all week. Please remember to tip your wait staff.

  12. #32
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Mechanicsburg, PA
    Quote Originally Posted by arnie View Post
    You left out the Holes’ odds😸
    Zero point zero

  13. #33
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Raleigh
    Quote Originally Posted by elvis14 View Post
    Just wanted to give you all a heads up. Anyone that's planning on going to any of the sweet sixteen games keep in mind that they have instituted a dress code this year centered around footwear. Sneakers, flats, boots, dress shoes, sandals, all OK but...no Heels.

    Thank you, thank you! I'll be here all week. Please remember to tip your wait staff.
    They're a bit late with this. Shoulda been in effect for the last 2-3 years.
    [redacted] them and the horses they rode in on.

  14. #34
    Quote Originally Posted by UrinalCake View Post
    I think the year that people complain about Duke’s path was 2010 because we didn’t have to face Kentucky and then played Butler in the final. Nobody remembers that that game was played ten minutes from Butler’s campus, or that they lost their best player and then went back to the Finals the following year, or that we also had to face Baylor in Houston in an earlier round.

    I’ve already heard CHeat fans complaining that we get to play Syracuse in our next game. They forget that two years ago they played a double digit Syracuse team in the Final Four!
    Yeah, this argument hinges on people underrating Butler...STILL! Years after the fact, after Hayward made an NBA all-star team, after they got back to the finals WITHOUT HAYWARD, after Brad Stevens has had NBA success...people still see the word "Butler" and discount them. They were a GREAT team.

  15. #35
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    New York City
    Quote Originally Posted by AGDukesky View Post
    Zero point zero
    Mr. Blutarsky ...
    Singler is IRON

    I STILL GOT IT! -- Ryan Kelly, March 2, 2013

  16. #36
    Quote Originally Posted by AGDukesky View Post
    Zero point zero
    LOL, to be more exact, I think their odds are: zero point zero zero

  17. #37
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    St Augustine, FL
    Quote Originally Posted by duke79 View Post
    LOL, to be more exact, I think their odds are: zero point zero zero
    Not necessarily... Heels may refuse to admit they lost, show up to round of 16 and play anyway. Heel lawyers win case against NCAA, Heels go to final four. Yikes, that's a bad scenario.

  18. #38
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty, or give me death!
    Quote Originally Posted by AGDukesky View Post
    Zero point zero
    Tarheels kwenda nyumbani means tarheels going home in Swahili. Of course you knew that right heels? No? Why not?

  19. #39
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Steamboat Springs, CO
    Quote Originally Posted by mr. synellinden View Post
    Sure. But how many of those times was it guaranteed by the start of the sweet 16? Possibly never.
    Probably never. When #11 VCU made the Final Four in 2011, #10 Florida State and #12 Richmond were in the same regional./ But the regional also included #1 Kansas.
    Sage Grouse

    ---------------------------------------
    'When I got on the bus for my first road game at Duke, I saw that every player was carrying textbooks or laptops. I coached in the SEC for 25 years, and I had never seen that before, not even once.' - David Cutcliffe to Duke alumni in Washington, DC, June 2013

  20. #40
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Hot'Lanta... home of the Falcons!
    Quote Originally Posted by Truth&Justise View Post
    Yeah, this argument hinges on people underrating Butler...STILL! Years after the fact, after Hayward made an NBA all-star team, after they got back to the finals WITHOUT HAYWARD, after Brad Stevens has had NBA success...people still see the word "Butler" and discount them. They were a GREAT team.
    One of the best rules of picking a winner in basketball is "pick the team with the best individual player." Well, in that game there is no question at all that the best player in the game was Gordon Hayward. No one else in that game has had anywhere close to his NBA career (Mason is second but you can make a solid argument that Shelvin Mack is third... he's at least alongside Lance and Singler as the third best pro from that game).
    Why are you wasting time here when you could be wasting it by listening to the latest episode of the DBR Podcast?

Similar Threads

  1. DWB Sweet Sixteen: Putting Mrs. Freeze on Ice!
    By killerleft in forum Elizabeth King Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-24-2015, 12:37 PM
  2. NCAA: Sweet 16/Elite 8
    By superdave in forum Elizabeth King Forum
    Replies: 258
    Last Post: 04-07-2014, 01:55 AM
  3. Women beat Florida in soccer, on to Sweet Sixteen
    By ajaxthewonderdog in forum Elizabeth King Forum
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 11-24-2013, 06:31 PM
  4. NCAAT: the Sweet Sixteen
    By -jk in forum Elizabeth King Forum
    Replies: 60
    Last Post: 03-29-2013, 11:12 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •