Looks like Silver is the Soup du jour...
https://www.reddit.com/r/WhitePeople...a23uv/buy_gme/
Did the federal government intervene to halt the gamestop trading?
I very much doubt it. It's not like the SEC folks are worried about the fortunes of some hedge funds.
I really think this is all explainable by the need of the brokers (Robinhood and some others) to meet capital requirements at the clearinghouse. I don't think the SEC could have prevented the clearinghouse and the brokers from limiting trading while additional capital was acquired.
https://www.reddit.com/r/WhitePeople..._these_shills/
I wonder how much money the hedge funds lost driving the price up that first 5% hoping that WSB would take the bait?
This is all beginning to feel like stuff that went on in that quadrennial thread that shut down recently.
The tug of war continues.
Thanks - but I can tell you I don't have a corner office or a job title beginning with a C.
But what I do have are a very particular set of skills, skills I have acquired over an extended adolescence.
Among them ... test-taking skills.
so yes ... FSA, CFA are the big ones.
I was more impressed with the quality of the CFA exam syllabus (sources, organization, process, etc.) But the study hours necessary, the pass rate, and travel time (years to completion) were not in the same league as actuarial exams. The first and third of those were 2-3 times higher on the actuarial side. I recall it got so bad that the SOA worked hard to reduce travel time - after I finished, of course. As I recall, the average time to completion was nearly 11 years at one point (25-30 yrs ago). How much less it is now, I don't know.
But anyway, that and $34 + tax will get you a BAII Plus.
That's impressive. I didn't realize that the FSA was so difficult. Wow. I know that the CFA usually takes 3 -5 years these days. I was considering getting it but it really doesn't help in my position. Instead, I went with the CFP® and CPWA®. The CPWA was more difficult but worth the effort.
That’s extremely impressive; I suspect less than a thousand people in the world have both!
I certainly believe you should be sitting in a corner. Many financial firms would benefit greatly from your unique and very valuable expertise. IMO, Berkshire would be a great example.
Caught the end of an NPR discussion this morning about payment for order flow that seemed to illuminate why many platforms will allow you to hold stocks and funds on their platforms at no cost. The platform sells their order flow through to funds that are faster and can jump the line to take positions ahead of your placed order. This seems like a much better exchange for the platform than what one platform told me when I asked how they make money ("we hope you will buy some of our funds"). Is that really how it works? Sell your free order flow to folks who will jump ahead of your orders to nibble at the spread?
If so, what is the solution to avoid being part of that order flow herd. One could use a pay to play platform but are they restricted in any way from doing the same thing?
Caveat: I only heard the last 60 seconds or so of the dialogue and may have missed some key points. Would be grateful for correction / education if I have grossly misunderstood the status quo.
It is really a scale concern I would think. I buy in relatively small amounts and very infrequently that I'm of the belief that this will have a minor impact to my overall performance. The fact that MSFT has risen 53.7% per year in the time I've owned it is far more influential.
The no commission brokerages make money from interest. Earning interest on cash (not substantial these days), earning money from lending securities to enable short selling (can be substantial, Vanguard funds sometimes beat the index because they pay these back out), and interest on margin (can be very high fees).
Here's M1 Finance with more details:https://www.m1finance.com/blog/how-m1-makes-money/