Originally Posted by
Ian
At what point do we revisit the put all our eggs in the OAD recruting strategy? Even counting 2015, we are not winning at any signficantly higher rate than we did before this strategy. We don't have any more ups than we did before and frankly the downs are worse.
Plus what was for me the most rewarding part of following college basketball, that of watching young players comes in and mature and leave as young men, watching them mentor the younger players and pass the torch, have been for the most part removed from the experience. We are now lucky if we have more than one or two seniors on the team in any given year.
We used to play the kind of defense SC played tonight, when we had a team of upperclassmen who's been through the fire with each other for multiple years.
We have used more than 1 one and done system twice. Once ended in a national title and one ended in a second round loss with 2 major injuries and one guy who missed 8 games and got into the flow mid-way through the season.
I too like to see kids develop over the course of years, but if they're good enough, they're going to leave (see Luke Kennard) regardless of how old they are. This is an easy thing to point to, but I don't believe it makes a difference. We're always going to have good seniors, but filling things out with talent is not a bad thing.
I know you didn't do it, but pointing to the success of UNC is an anomaly because their 3 McDs All Americans stayed for 3 or more years. That doesn't happen other places.
I'm glad we get the most talented kids, especially if they love Duke and work hard. Nothing to criticize there IMO. We haven't sold our sole. The goal for most kids is to get to the league. Again, Grayson and Kennard are perfect examples of this. It happens everywhere, we just have more talented kids who leave.
Whatever the hell "it" is, Jabari found it.
-Roy "Ole Huck" Williams