And everyone who watches crime procedurals know that they should have some holes in their story or they've collaborated on a cover story. ("Which tire" notwithstanding...)
-jk
And everyone who watches crime procedurals know that they should have some holes in their story or they've collaborated on a cover story. ("Which tire" notwithstanding...)
-jk
Actually, small inconsistencies are quite common in literary and screen epics.
There are numerous scholars who have used the many inconsistencies on Homer's Iliad and Odyssey to "prove" that the great epics were originally oral compositions. (redacted)
But the best analogy to what we've been debating here is another popular cinematic masterpiece -- Citizen Kane.
Everybody knows the great problem with Welles' storytelling -- no one is in the room to hear Kane's last word. On screen, he gasps "Rosebud" and drops the globe. It shatters on the floor ... THEN a nurse rushes into the room check Kane, then covers him with a sheet.
That raises the question, Who heard him say Rosebud, which drives the plot of the movie?
Well, there is a throwaway line later in the film where Raymond (the Butler) claims that Kane said the word when his second wife left and adds "that other time too." That could be taken to mean that the Butler heard his last word. Was he in the room what Kane died? I guess anything is possible, but Welles doesn't show it -- and it sure looks like the room is empty when the nurse rushes in. On the other hand, the reporters only talk to Raymond late in their search to discover the meaning of Rosebud.
Either way, it is a very sloppy and inconsistent moment in a film that is often touted as the greatest of all time.
I guess Rogue One can survive an inconsistency or two (not that anybody is going to tout it as the greatest film of all time).
Last edited by JasonEvans; 01-12-2017 at 08:09 AM. Reason: removed religious content
Why are you wasting time here when you could be wasting it by listening to the latest episode of the DBR Podcast?
Agreed, that would be wonderful, especially since it would echo Leia's own reaction to Han's death.
Apart from how her absence will impact the story, another question that comes to mind is: in Star Wars, our heroes usually shuffle off this mortal coil in such a way as to render funerals impractical. I think Vader is the only precedent for a main character dying and leaving a body behind. Do they leave Leia's death as just an offscreen acknowledgment, or do they include a more forceful memorial to Leia and/or Carrie Fisher - a service, a graveside scene, an epitaph, etc.?
Also, for any who are interested in a discussion of cuts and reshoots, check out this video. Near the end, it includes a supercut of the trailer footage that never made it to the movie proper, which quite highlights that this was once indeed a different movie.
I still think this is how it should be (and should have been) done:
https://youtu.be/MDUrw7j0UA4
Why are you wasting time here when you could be wasting it by listening to the latest episode of the DBR Podcast?
Sorry, I was unclear: I wasn't saying that no person or no jedi leaves a body behind when s/he dies. I also wasn't referencing only the jedi-disembodiment death, but more the tendency of the heroes in the Star Wars saga to die in a way that renders funerals impossible - disembodiment (Yoda, Obi Wan, and I suspect Luke, when the time comes), explosions (Biggs, Bail Organa), or long falls (Han, Mace Windu, and I supposed Palpatine, though we wouldn't see his funeral anyway), and thus the lack of a need for funerals of these characters.
But you are absolutely right, I had neglected the prequels - Qui Gon had a pyre similar to Vader's in that movie I wish hadn't happened, and Padme had her own funeral procession after she died of a broken heart (oy). So I suppose precedent exists for main character funerals, albeit precedent I assiduously try to forget. Personally, I hope Leia gets a lighter treatment than Padme did, especially since I suspect her death will need to be at least mostly offscreen, but I suppose we just have to wait and see.
Luke gives Uncle Owen and Aunt Beru a funeral in ANH.
LucasFilm/Disney have announced that they will not digitally recreate Princess Leia for Episode IX.
Why are you wasting time here when you could be wasting it by listening to the latest episode of the DBR Podcast?
Looks like I am third to the party with the news.
Link:
https://www.cnet.com/news/lucasfilm-...source=twitter
Lucasfilm says they have "no plans" to use CGI to recreate Princess Leia for Episode IX. This is very different than saying that they will not use CGI.
I'm picking up an undertone that CGI would be disrespectful for some reason? Am I reading this right? Why is it OK to recreate Peter Cushing's likeness, but not Carrie Fisher's?
Interesting that Carrie Fisher WILL appear in the next Star Wars (episode VIII).
She had already completed shooting before her death.
The story I read said that she was going to have a larger role in Episode IX -- obviously that has to change. I wonder if they play with the story in VIII to set up her death?