I realize there are moments when instant replay is helping to make correct calls. But I feel like refs have begun to rely on it way too much. Take the end of the VT-Wake game just now.

With 6 seconds left, the refs decided to review the out of bounds call. That decision unfairly gave Wake an extra timeout that it didn't have. Worse, there was a clear uncalled foul after which Cody-McIntyre actually knocked the ball out of bounds. So what are they to do? It was pretty apparent that the refs didn't call the foul on the contact and what they "saw" was a play in moment where the ball should have remained with Wake.

Only problem was, the decided to review it and then saw both the uncalled foul and the last touch by Wake. So what are they to do? You can't call a foul in retrospect. But it was also clearly out on Wake. They ended giving it back to Wake anyway... seemingly reaching the same conclusion via instant replay that they did in real time. Only it was very awkward and controversial to just give the ball back to Wake the way they did when it was clearly off Cody-McIntyre.

So what the heck was the point of the review? They boxed themselves into a corner. Had Wake won, it would have been a heck of a controversy. Just stupid.