Originally Posted by
Edouble
Yeah, but Jean Lundegaard was ransomed for a cool million and there was only one buyer... and that was in 1987! I'm sure the thief can get a pretty penny for it.
You know what, I had forgotten that the story is in the past when Fargo was new.
One of the consistently most interesting things about the Coens is that they enjoy making films about stories that are in the past, but only a little. Inside Llewyn Davis is pretty lousy for their high standard, but it fits the category (1960s). So too No Country for Old Men (1980) and A Serious Man (1966ish). They aren't making movies about the Early Modern period, pretty much.
On the No Country director's commentary, one of them said it's a lot harder to do art direction for the recent past than it is for sometime that's a long time ago.
A movie is not about what it's about; it's about how it's about it.
---Roger Ebert
Some questions cannot be answered
Who’s gonna bury who
We need a love like Johnny, Johnny and June
---Over the Rhine