When I am having a discussion with someone I am always very skeptical about people who don’t see shades of gray. Very few things are 100% perfect or 100% bad.
I recognize that you are basically the only pro-crypto person here against a sea of skeptics. But to say “it’s hard to find flaws” really takes away most of the limited credibility you have left.
Those of us still participating here are trying really hard to be open minded. But even the biggest crypto advocate (other than you) would admit that the system has flaws. The question is whether the positives outweigh the flaws. I would generally say they don’t but to make a compelling argument that they do, you have to admit the flaws. My middle schooler is doing this now in his writing classes - it is really basic.
I’m still trying to figure out why I keep banging my head against the wall and coming back here…