Originally Posted by
Mal
Agreed on this. I'd say he's in the top 15, though (post-1920 or so), at least in my book. Clearly, Tiger and Jack are at the top. Hogan, Jones, Palmer probably are the next wave, followed by Watson, Snead, Sarazen, Hagen, and Player, in no particular order. That's 10, and although you could make a case for Mickelson over a couple of the guys at the end of that, it would be a stretch to put him any higher than 9th at best. I'd say Mickleson's probably in the next raft, with Trevino, Nelson, Faldo and Seve. So I think an argument could be made for anything from 9 to 15 or so.
That said, if he wins another major (and especially if he finally wins a U.S. Open), he'd have a good case for vaulting over Sarazen and Player in my mind, putting him no worse than 8th all-time. He'd have 6 major victories, possibly a career Grand Slam, a ton of tour victories, one of the best final rounds ever played in a major (at this year's British), plus about 47 runner up finishes at the U.S. Open.