May it be so. But this prediction seems wildly optimistic (from a Duke perspective, of course) to me. Granted Maryland is offensively challenged, their defense is strong and Duke is still trying to put together a solid Ryan-less offense. So I don't know about a 28 point margin.
Dude, why so harsh on Murphy? He can pass. From GoDuke.com:
International Basketball
Played for the U-20 Finnish National Team in the 2012 FIBA U-20 World Championships
Finished as the team's leading scorer, rebounder and shot blocker ... averaged 17.4 points, 6.6 rebounds, 1.4 assists, 1.3 blocks and 1.1 steals per game
High School
Averaged 21.0 points, 7.2 rebounds and 4.0 assists per game in 2011
Yes, but I think it's a lot harder to bench Seth with Ryan already out than it was to bench Quinn in the first couple games of the year.
I completely agree. The main point of this sort of offense would be to open things up for passing to Mason, Amile, or Seth, and only attempting to finish if the defense backs off.
I'll go with Quinn, Seth, Rasheed, Amile, and Mason, essentially giving me Quinn and Seth against Tyler and Alex.
I like British Ales and American microbrews. Not sure how you'll get it in the mail, though.
Didn't Cook average some absurd number of assists in a FIBA tournament, like 12-13 a game?
Anyway, the point is that Murphy has yet to show that he can provide efficient scoring or create scoring for others against college competition. Which is fine for a freshman providing depth off the bench, but it isn't an argument for starting him.
A bunch of lineup tweaks seems unlikely. If there is anything changed, I'd bet Coach K pushes the pace. Every last guy on our roster can run the floor pretty well. Run teams to do death and use Rasheed/Amile/Alex/Tyler to rotate through a two-man full-court press assignment and just hound ball handlers for 40 minutes.
Mason is pretty awesome in the open court. Rasheed, Seth, Tyler and Quinn can all push the ball by dribble on the break. Amile and Alex should be strong finishers.
Super "I think I always argue we should run, press, trap more for some reason" Dave
I also think it doesn't serve a message of positive benefit. Some argue that K simply plays whoever will give the best chance of a win and one could argue that he may bench Seth to reward someone who hustled more against Miami. However, I don't think benching (or not starting) Seth would significantly impact those things in a positive way. On the contrary, I think it would be negative in terms of our experience, confidence, and would unnecessarily call attention to Seth's Miami performance (and I DO think K always has a kid's future in mind). So, even if he doesn't get as many minutes, I will be a bit surprised if he doesn't start.
As do I, as do I. While it may happen as you say, I am quite fearful of this. Given our let-down in discipline and the way NCSU and Miami dominated transition, I don't think out young guys have the defensive acumen to engage in an up-and-down point-war. (Although, if we actually make our shots, our transition defense is probably much better than recently displayed).
This should be the first click for the winner of this bet:
http://www.beermonthclub.com/
I'm just gonna collect mine personally from Bob Green on the point spread at the first FB tailgate this season.
[redacted] them and the horses they rode in on.
Here are a few links from the MD side looking at this game...
Game preview focusing on MD's road woes (interesting that most fan comments at the end seem to have low expectations for tomorrow):
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/...lve-road-woes/
Their all-black uniforms for Sat:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/...forms-vs-duke/
Maryland has Point Guard issues:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/sports...d5b_story.html
MD's Jake "The Hair" Layman talks about the game and their prep:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/...-and-his-hair/
Al Featherston's comments from his front page story might be a good way to transit from Miami to Md.
"Frankly, until we see Duke play a few more games, it’s impossible to evaluate the depth of the troubles that Wednesday night’s game revealed... The next few weeks are going to be tough … the hopes for a championship season depend either on Krzyzewski finding a miraculous solution to the current problems or for Kelly to return to action. Until we see what happens, we can’t really start to put the Miami defeat into any kind of perspective."
Looking to "a few more games" and "see[ing] what happens," Newton_14 and SoCalDukeFan in the post-Miami thread laid out K's problem for the intermediate term, maybe next 2+ weeks, next 5 games [Md, @Wake, @FSU, NCSt, @BC], I assume their straightforward formulation might summarize an overwhelming consensus on EK.
Most of this thread has been devoted to a civil debate re how K might shake up things by (1) starting, well, someone other than Seth, and (2) giving more PT inside to someone other than Josh, i.e., Alex or Amile, or maybe Marshall. This is a not unreasonable debate, for the unpopular Seth Greenberg has, as tele notes, also straightforwardly stated Duke's key post-Kelly problem:
I've no clue as to whether K will break out drastic changes - start Murphy, and/or Thornton, and/or Marshall? full-court press? twin towers? Sulaimon at PG? - or stick with tweaking - getting Mason the ball lower on the blocks? a few more sets that are intended to get Cook, Sulaimon, Murphy into the lane for runners, tear-drops, lay-ups? more screens to get Curry shots without his being beat up trying to get open?
I'll be looking for any and all of these, and maybe even others suggested as possibles in this thread. Most of all, I'll be looking at Mason. Here are some constructively critical comments on Mason's problems v, Miami:
The next 15 days incorporate all games up to UNC in CIS. [It's still strange, and sort of irritating, that Duke plays both Wake and NCSt twice before playing UNC the first time.] I don't expect, over the next 5 games, that K will make drastic changes where Mason is concerned. I cannot imagine - and as best I can recall no one has suggested - Mason not starting. Also hard to imagine - though here maybe a couple of posters have imagined - another drastic change re Mason: playing him, for more than a minute, at the 4. I don't see it, for as oldnavy and tommy have noted, most of us assume Mason plays best pretty close to, with back to, the basket. We've all been impressed with his improvement. Until recently.
For - cursed be the name Seth Greenberg - as this season has, uh, recently regressed, opposing coaches seem to have caught on to the fact that Mason can be bumped, crowded, pushed out too easily, blocked, and [my obsession] footwork-distressed, to the point that Mason has looked discombobulated in the first half of the GT game and pretty much throughout the Miami game. So it's no insight on my part to say we all will be watching Saturday to see how Md plays Mason and how he responds.
As for the ghost-D that Duke played against Miami, maybe on that side of the ball K will go for "drastic" rather than "tweak." The truth is, I've no idea what to expect, beyond a much better, less confused, effort on D, against, after all, a team that should not be able to score enough points on Sat to beat Duke.