Says that he accepted travel and lodging during 3 unofficial visits to 2 schools, but didn't name the schools. Has that information come out elsewhere?
According to ESPN, the NCAA has ruled Muhammad ineligible, with no number of games specified--apparently for the entire season. http://espn.go.com/los-angeles/ncb/s...le-ucla-bruins
Says that he accepted travel and lodging during 3 unofficial visits to 2 schools, but didn't name the schools. Has that information come out elsewhere?
I'm confused as to whether he's ineligible (period) or ineligible with the length of time TBD. To me it would make sense that someone is eligible or not, but some articles are stating that the length of time he's ineligible will be determined subsequently. How does that make any sense? Isn't he either an amateur or not without any middle ground in between?
According to that ESPN article,
"Those visits were to Duke and North Carolina and were paid for by a family friend, a source unauthorized to speak publicly on the matter said. The friend, a financial advisor, is the brother of an assistant coach of Muhammad's high school team in Las Vegas."
Glad we dodged that bullet!
A small protest:
http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/ncaab-...43--ncaab.html
Just as an FYI, there are lots of folks on the UCLA boards and others out here who are fairly well connected with UCLA who believe that it was Coach K that turned Shabazz in after either the commitment to UCLA or perhaps even earlier than that when he learned that Shabazz would not be coming to Duke. I haven't seen a shred of evidence of it, and I won't believe it until I do, and I haven't researched what the timing of various events were, but those types of rumors are swirling.
Swirling rumors, love em. Coach K snitches on Shabazz in exchange for leniency in the Lance Thomas case. Seems like Roy would want a piece of that action all things considered. Maybe Roy and K are co-conspirators? Maybe Cal, Roy AND K are in on it? Not to take a shot at you Tommy but "fairly well connected" is my favorite board phrase usually tantamount to "doesn't know what the hell he/she is talking about."
Airowe linked this article from CBS Sports in the Shabazz recruiting thread in February, well before Muhammad committed to UCLA. http://www.cbssports.com/collegebask...ds-eligibility This is the same stuff that ultimately led to the ineligibility ruling.
While it's hard to know for sure when Coach K knew that Shabazz Muhammad would not come to Duke, IIRC he was still recruiting him pretty heavily in February. So I'm not thinking Coach K is likely the source here. And there has never been the slightest indication that either Duke or UNC knew anything about the involvement of this financial advisor in the financing of Muhammad's early unofficial visits to both schools.
Judging from this quotation "When we went on the visits, we filled out the NCAA compliance forms and fully disclosed that our family friend, Benjamin Lincoln, had paid for the trips" it appears that the "source" was Holmes himself particularly if those forms must be submitted to the NCAA.
.
Yes, good point. From what I remember reading about this before, the family was upfront about all this and believed what they were doing was within the rules. The fact that the family friend was a financial advisor, and thus presumably someone who might have some future financial interest in Shabazz Muhammad's career, seemed to be what made the NCAA see things differently.
As far as I know, recruits can take unofficial visits whenever they want, but I wonder if Duke (or any other school) monitors the corresponding financial arrangements. It wouldn't be a problem if a family is driving up from Atlanta or down from NJ, but if someone is flying cross country as Muhammad was, then everything gets more complicated. It's a good thing, as the article notes, that he was looking for an Adidas school and that Duke doesn't have to deal with this.
WRT Duke being the source of the complaint to the NCAA: As far as I know, the NCAA doesn't disclose sources. Therefore, any news on the subject would have to come from the person who made the report or be pure supposition -- or worse. Can we conclude that K DID NOT call Ben Howland to tell him he reported Shabazz? Therefore, like most rumors, they are self-serving and worthless.
Moreover, Duke deals with the NCAA enforcers through a compliance officer (or perhaps through the University Counsel, who might speak to the NCAA in-house lawyer). No coach would ever contact the NCAA directly on such a matter -- it would be a serious breakdown in procedure.
sagegrouse
This may have already done the rounds and I apologize if it has, but I saw yesterday that Shabazz was declared ineligible because of he "accepted travel and lodging during three unofficial visits to Duke and North Carolina"
What's the deal?
Was something done wrong by the institutions during these trips or was Shabazz supposed to reimburse afterwards and didn't do so?
From my understanding, the payments had zero to do with Duke or North Carolina. So nothing awry there. Shabazz was given the travel money by a friend of his family, who just so happens to be the brother of Shabazz's AAU coach, and that is in violation of NCAA rules. Actually pretty ridiculous if you ask me, but the way it is.
Now, it's entirely possible that Duke or UNC discovered what was going on and alerted the NCAA in order to clear their names of any wrongdoing. But who knows.
There is already a thread up on this so I'm assuming these posts will be moved. But as to the story itself, since Duke and UNC are only the places he visited and didn't pay for them, it doesn't matter. What is more interesting is the reports now about Muhammad's case handling by the NCAA.
http://www.latimes.com/sports/colleg...,1557715.storyA conversation overheard on an Aug. 7 commuter flight from Chicago to Memphis, Tenn., has prompted attorneys representing UCLA basketball player Shabazz Muhammad to call for the NCAA to drop its investigation and declare him eligible.
Q "Why do you like Duke, you didn't even go there." A "Because my art school didn't have a basketball team."
Certainly for a certain young lawyer's career (and perhaps her boyfriend's relationship):
A lawyer says she heard a man say on Aug. 7 that his girlfriend was an NCAA attorney investigating Shabazz Muhammad and that he said, 'I can guarantee you that he's not going to play.'
Certainly there was a loose lip. But the Muhammad family confessed to the source of the money to UCLA and the NCAA. So the violation is clear. Nothing the NCAA lawyer may have thought or said will change that, no matter what the timing of the overheard conversation may be.