Originally Posted by
JasonEvans
It does not really matter -- I don't think the players could ever stage enough exhibitions to provide a meaningful source of income to a meaningful percentage of the player's association. I mean, the NBA stages more than hundred games a month with almost all of them televised in some fashion.
Sure, the 20 or 30 best NBA stars could hold some exhibitions and make money, but what about each team's 6th, 7th, and 8th men? Heck, what about the 9th, 10th, 11th and 12th men? Is anyone buying tickets to or televising the exhibition game featuring Pape Sy, Hilton Armstrong, Avery Bradley, Dante Cunningham, Dominick Brown, Alonzo Gee, Manny Harris, Ian Mahinmi, Gary Forbes, Jonas Jerebko, Terrico White, Jeff Adrien, and others?
The faces we constantly see in the negotiations, the big stars, certainly matter. But, this impasse affects scores of players getting paid the minimum or just slightly above it. These are the guys living well, but living paycheck to paycheck. They are the ones who feel the pressure to cave the most.
-Jason "of course, the guys who are affected most by the proposed salary cuts are the stars, not the guys making the minimum-- the minimum (I think) stays the same under the proposed deals" Evans