Originally Posted by
loran16
I'm confused about people voting for Kyle. No one was hitting 3s. But Nolan was the only one scoring for whole parts of the game, scored the most, and well, Kyle missed at least 3 open 3s in the first half and more in the 2nd.
20 points on 17 shots is not really efficient, and shouldn't get you MotM unless EVERYONE ELSE was dreadful. Nolan of course had 32 points on 19 shots. Ummm yeah. And Nolan heck had more BOARDS than Kyle. Seriously, there's NO justification for voting for Kyle today.
I can see voting for Tyler or Kelly for other various reasons. But there was nothing Kyle did that wasn't beaten by another player (In this case, Nolan).
I can see abstaining (This was a terrible game, how can there be a MotM). But Kyle, seriously? He's had games where he deserves it. This isn't one of them.
--------------------------------------------------------
(Incidentally, for those hating on my comments last week, see how I'm arguing for Nolan here? :-P)
I realize you like stats and efficiency numbers, which I do as well, but I don't necessarily feel that everything in basketball can be reduced to efficiency and stats. I don't begrudge anyone who voted Nolan MOTM. There was another player who seemed to play with intensity for much of the game and scored more than Nolan when the team fell behind in the first half. His name is Kyle and though he didn't shoot well, he took the ball inside to get closer shots and had a few and-ones that looked like they had the potential to help the team get closer. You have made it quite clear what your opinion is of who should be MOTM of a match where nobody for Duke could be said to have had a great game. My opinion is that Kyle may have had the least bad game, especially when nobody else was scoring in the first half.
“Those two kids, they’re champions,” Krzyzewski said of his senior leaders. “They’re trying to teach the other kids how to become that, and it’s a long road to become that.”