Results 1 to 2 of 2
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Back in the dirty Jerz

    Angry NCAA rule for review of fighting

    See my post in the other thread on the rules:

    But according to the NCAA rulebook (Rule 10, Sec 19, Art 8), the league may not review a referee's decision to rule fighting and they may not lessen the penalty.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Austin, TX
    This was not moved, and I think wisely, because this is a different topic. Is this really true that Duke can't appeal a referee's decision? What is the procedure for appealing? I couldn't believe they ejected him and made it a suspendable offense because, I think, Duke has the burden now to show it wasn't suspendable.

    The refs, at the most, should have called an intentional/T. K would have still pulled Hendu, and the game would have ended. If the suspense was suspendable, the ACC could take care of it like what the Big XII did with Boggans at OSU last week. If the refs, by calling it fighting, have taken away any avenue for Duke to appeal, well then this just SUCKS.
    Last edited by A-Tex Devil; 03-04-2007 at 07:47 PM.

Similar Threads

  1. NBA Draft Rule -- What should it be?
    By MChambers in forum Elizabeth King Forum
    Replies: 31
    Last Post: 04-07-2008, 01:16 PM
  2. Rule Quiz! (File this one under 9J)
    By grc5 in forum Elizabeth King Forum
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 02-29-2008, 02:08 PM
  3. Fighting a traffic violation - advice?
    By Bostondevil in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 10-25-2007, 07:00 PM
  4. Mike Vick involved in dog fighting?
    By ChrisP in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 07-11-2007, 09:49 AM
  5. Wait One Year for the NBA Rule
    By SoCalDukeFan in forum Elizabeth King Forum
    Replies: 32
    Last Post: 03-30-2007, 04:49 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts