In defense of Barry Bonds

[alteran]

It was my understanding that they included sealed grand jury documents, or facts contained therein, in their book.

Do you have a smoking gun? ;-)

[alteran]

Once again, if you have substantial proof of this, I'd be all ears. Or, you could go the allenmurray route and just throw out baseless and unsubstantiated accusations.

Afterall, that seems to be the norm surrounding this whole ordeal anyway.

First, when your case requires you to make ad hominem attacks, it makes it look like you can't make your case with facts.

Second, there's plenty of sourced facts in this thread, you just keep ignoring them. Or rather, dismissing them with, well, unsourced and sometimes cryptic assertions. In fact, I can't find one fact in your posts refuting sourced allegations-- just assertions that they're untrustworthy, and some of these are based on the most irrelevant criteria.

All this despite your proclivity to demand facts AND sources from those on the other side of the debate.

My head spins.