Since all the other college football threads are on topic, I assume this is.
Bradford winning is a joke.
Any other year, I understand his stats are overwhelming, but consider he was a little over half of OU's total offense and Colt and Tebow were well over 60% (Colt was 70%), plus UT burying him in the turf, and I give up on the national media. I could throw for 3000 yards with those OU's offensive weapons. Stats and hot teams is all that matters for trophy that no longer matters. Seriously. Other than Tebow last year (who had a uniquely excellent season), every winner from the last 8 or 9 years played in the BCS championship and has not necessarily been the best player (or close... Reggie Bush). Every Heisman voter should have to write a 500 word essay explaining their vote. Otherwise, I assume they are sheep, following the press and the stats. Take their vote away.
OU gets over on UT twice this year for nothing more than good timing. Stupid land thieves. At least at the end of the day, they have to live in Oklahoma. Anyway, rant over....