So, I basically skipped the Steve Thomas era of This Old House. Sorry, Steve!
Printable View
So, I basically skipped the Steve Thomas era of This Old House. Sorry, Steve!
Beautiful Sunday morning in the SA. Sunny, low 60s and the humidity has dropped 15 pts from yesterday.
I don't have a problem with guys wearing sandals or flops. But, just like women, be mindful of what your feet look like before you do. Just sayin'.
Now, tank tops or muscle shirts . . . that's a WHOLE other issue. Unless you are Tom Selleck from the 80s, go for the sleeves.
Penchant was the word I was looking for. Sometimes the words escape you.
<tips hat>
My wife always screws up the words when we sing this song around the house - which happens more often than you might imagine.
Instead of
"..wish I had a rabbit in a hat with a bat and '64 impala"
she sings
"...wish I had a rabbit ina hat with a bat, what 'chu think about that?"
I'm not mad at her.
Last time I saw my primary care doc, she praised my feet, but I rarely choose to display them in public because, among my many admirable traits, I have great humility.
I'm with you on muscle shirts, sitting next to some guy wearing one on an airplane is among the reasons I tolerate air travel rather than relish it.
During a lecture for Physicians this week I was asked for my opinion about something that is not officially within my purview currently, but about which I have spoken at conferences in the past. I told the Physicians this and then I answered. And after I gave my answer I left them with this little gem: "That is my inclination based on the data and current literature, but I am not officially authorized to answer this in my current capacity, so, to quote Young Jeezy: 'If you get jammed up don't mention my name.' ".
Gone 12 days. Only damage seems to be 1 dead mouse. Not bad.
I wish I could drop some lyrics from that song, but the majority would be wankerized.
Instead, I will just link to the obviously NSFW music video which I hold is in the pantheon of all time music videos.
Again, in case you missed it, NSFW:
https://youtu.be/5wBTdfAkqGU
Seriously. Saruman didn’t need orcs, he needed to stop by Petco for a pack of Jacks.
And here I was thinking LTE had been on a tear...
Oak pollen is horrendous right now.
I wonder how long it would take me to tire of a spaghetti and pizza diet?
And just like that...
Now it is time to vacuum. Weekends are such fun.
Of course, if I had a new vacuum cleaner, maybe?
I wish they’d bump the 60 second wait to 30.
It's a Dyson Ball Animal 2 and it is awesome. It arrived yesterday.
And the thunder rolls...
Sitting in church watching your own recorded children's message is worse than doing it live. Although Gavin does a great job editing it.
I need to get a picture of my hellabore plant. I think this is the first time it has bloomed.
38 on 16-22.
I though it was 28 or 6 to 4?
Camshaft ordered.
Most respiratory therapists are very much gear heads and closet engineers. I am not. I am in that small (and exceedingly dorky) group that is more into gas laws, anatomy and physiology and mathematics. I can tell you that, by and large, this wing of the profession didn't date a ton in college.
Hmmmm...I am willing and comfortable speaking in front of large groups and I seem to be compelling enough that people will at least entertain what I discuss. I'm not sure if that qualifies as a skill. I can do a little woodworking (I made our valances) and I can rewire a lamp or light fixture. I can change a ceiling fan and light fixtures too. I can change a tire in less than 10 minutes. I can cook most anything, but I'm awful at baking...can't follow directions. Not sure how many of these are actually skills or proof I die as "unnamed character" in the opening scene of a zombie apocalypse movie.
nipping into a store today to buy carpeting for our stairs...a pretty rare public appearance, may have to go with sunglasses.
Got a 33 inch, 26 pound monster with some flint stones band aids from his boosters.
I do feel lately that I keep repeating myself in this thread, but, you know, after 13+ years, do I really have anything new to say? Anyway, because of my husband's work, I have met (and had dinner) with a lot of Nobel prize winning scientists. They are, by and large, a humble lot. The smartest people are the ones who know what they don't know. The Nobel prize winners also admit it.
We didn't know in the early days of the pandemic and we were in a situation where all of the ventilators at hospitals were being utilized on adults and I got to be part of a Consortium of medical professionals working with the FDA with resource allocation and it was enlightening to say the least. Even though it didn't affect babies, the loss of material resources did and we were scrambling to fill the void. I worked with a very heroic neonatologist in South Carolina to come up with some emergency solutions for neonatal ventilation.
Leaping into World War I with my 7th graders today. It’s a remarkably easy way to come back from Spring Break...I love to teach this material, kids this age find it really engaging, and I know it so well that I can pick it back up very easily. I’m also extremely proud to be more or less on schedule with my rather aggressive World History curriculum this year.
Doesn’t even feel like work.
Day 3 of 4 on all day video meetings.
Ugh.
speaking of world history (which I happen to enjoy) I'm currently reading the new, most excellent biography of Sir Francis Drake entitled In Search of a Kingdom: Francis Drake, Elizabeth I and the Perilous Birth of the British Empire.
Pretty fascinating to read about some guy circumnavigating the globe in the 1500s...
I have a nephew who is 2 1/2. At 15 mos, he figured out how to open the refrigerator and help himself to snacks. Not fat, just a big kid, solid as a rock. We were at one of the last Duke football games of 2019, and at 11 mos, he was twice the size of an 18 mo girl he was chatting with.
Of course, the other day my niece told me she caught him licking the headlight of a car in the parking lot. Not sure about the mental growth just yet.
I think this is actually a chicken-or-egg thing. There's been an uptick in recent years of tongue [sort of]-in-cheek flat earther material on Hikory Dikory Dok or whatever inane social media apps the youths are using these days, and Kyrie is pretty well tapped into that zeitgeist. I think he started his flat-earth stuff as an intentionally inscrutable nod to that tongue-in-cheek joking, and then it got away from him a little bit. I believe he always intended for people to not be totally sure whether or not he was joking, but also that he underestimated the extent to which people would take it seriously, especially the aforementioned youths whose ability to incisively discern sarcasm is rudimentary at best.
I too have seen an uptick in flat earth comments/questions in my class in the last few years, and although I'm known for my everyday humor in the classroom, that's one thing I refuse to joke about or give a whole lot of breathing room in my teaching. It has jumped the shark in the sense that there are people now unable to recognize any joke about it, who've genuinely lost their ability to see how absurd the notion of a flat earth is.
I have also met a number of intellectually advanced folks, including some Nobel laureates. I would not say that the bolded is particularly true. In fact, I attended a gathering held in honor of a world-famous musician who had sponsored the lecture at which a certain Nobel laureate had given the keynote address. The latter seemed a bit miffed that the mere musician was getting more attention than he was.
In my experience, a good number - probably the majority - of extremely gifted folks are, indeed, humble. A rare few are not humble in any way. And a substantial group of others have learned to use humble words and maintain humility to most outward appearances, but while nevertheless maintaining a rather high opinion of themselves. In other words, I don't think humility is particularly a signature trait of the gifted. It seems to occur with rather normal frequency.
Internet board hot take: Nobel Laureates are also likely a subset of extremely gifted people that may skew humble based on their career pursuits but extremely gifted people also occupy finance, business, political and other realms that may skew less humble than the laureate pool.
Almost all of my interactions with these folks is confined to people who take care of babies. I have had one of these super advanced folks postulate that perhaps people who take care of babies are just nice folks. So I made a generalization and it probably wasn't correct. If virtually all of my interactions have been good, that is perhaps not true of the wider world. Although I was piggybacking on Bostondevil's experiences too. Maybe I know nice people and you know jerks? 😉
All of the Nobel laureates I have met were given their prizes for either physics or chemistry. My hypothesis is that since research in the scientific fields requires much more collaboration than the other fields where one might win a Nobel prize, scientists are more likely to be humble because they know they didn't get there completely by themselves. Are there big jerks in science? Absolutely.
It's kinda like what I see in the theater world. I have long maintained that the hardest people to deal with in theater are playwrights. I have a friend who argues with me that actors beat playwrights. We have however reached a compromise. I have conceded that on the whole actors do need more attention but mediocre playwrights, those that have had just enough success to think they have more talent than they actually do have, are insufferable. Insufferable. My friend agrees. I have met many a Harvard scientist who acts the same way. For more than a few Harvard science types, the pinnacle of their careers is getting tenure at Harvard. In the world of science, they've made it to the NBA, but they aren't starters and will never come close to being an All Star. For many of them, it's a bitter pill and it turns them into jerks.
I'm interested to hear more of your thoughts here. Are they mad about "missed" notoriety, or what? The average tenured Harvard professor in the hard sciences makes something like $250-300k per annum, which is a downright fortune in an academic career. Do they just think the rest of the world should find them more important, or something? I will say, tenured professors in any field are one of the dourest, most sullen lots I've ever encountered, but getting tenure at an Ivy would seem to clearly qualify as having "made it." To me, it seems that many of these people are determined to see a glass as 5% empty, rather than 95% full. Sheesh.
https://cooking.nytimes.com/recipes/...d-chicken-legs
What's on the docket for tonight. As always, recipes are General guidelines and I put different stuff in here but this is really tasty stuff.
Well, being as I am a jerk, and it is a cosmic law that like attracts like, you're probably not wrong. :o
Speak on....o toothless one
Sleepy, need more iced tea.
That about sums it up. Also, at a place like Harvard, there a multiple Nobel laureates attending the faculty meetings reminding you that even though from the outside looking in, you are one of the best in the world, you are still second tier in your home department. The administration likes two kinds of faculty best, famous big deals that up their prestige and nose to the grindstone producers who get lots of grants. The majority of Harvard faculty is neither.
The hubby was the 2nd type. That kind of professor is appreciated by the administration but vulnerable to getting screwed over, mostly by other faculty.
Green chicken chili will put Monday in the bag.
Ideal hours per week and days per week to work if you had complete control?
I've worked 4 9s and a half day which I liked. Being forced to get up and going on Fridays meant that I was ready to take on the rest of the afternoon.
I've worked four 12s(days), 4 off, 4 12s(night), 4 off, repeat. The nights are not easy. But those 4 days off are awesome.
I like time where the rest of the world is busy and I have the time off.
I like to travel alone and have done so a lot in my life on a personal basis. I do not like going to the same Hilton Garden Inns in Des Moines and Indianapolis week-after-week and going to the same 4 restaurants with the same colleagues and then meeting in the same stale foyer to drink the same crappy coffee to go to the same office. Flip side, every once in a while, they let the rank and file book passage on the corporate jet when the execs weren't on it. That was cool.
So, 40 hours/week, regardless?
You seem like you like your work.