PDA

View Full Version : Three Clemson football players fail drug test



jimsumner
12-24-2018, 06:26 PM
http://www.espn.com/college-football/story/_/id/25609141/status-unclear-clemson-tigers-dt-dexter-lawrence-positive-test

BD80
12-24-2018, 06:27 PM
http://www.espn.com/college-football/story/_/id/25609141/status-unclear-clemson-tigers-dt-dexter-lawrence-positive-test

unc players never have to take tests ...

devildeac
12-24-2018, 06:50 PM
unc players never have to take tests ...

Good thing they won't miss a bowl game this season...

richardjackson199
12-24-2018, 08:08 PM
Bama also suspended 3 players including a starter, but I don't think it will affect them at all:

http://www.espn.com/college-football/story/_/id/25610190/alabama-crimson-tide-suspends-3-players-including-starting-ol-deonte-brown-orange-bowl

Bob Green
12-24-2018, 08:22 PM
Dexter Lawrence not being available to play is a big deal. He anchors the middle of Clemson's defensive line.

richardjackson199
12-24-2018, 08:40 PM
Dexter Lawrence not being available to play is a big deal. He anchors the middle of Clemson's defensive line.

Agreed. But after reading Dabo's comments in the article, I believe Dabo that these players probably did nothing intentionally to juice. Sounds like they did something like buy the wrong Monster drink at the 7-11. But they probably won't be able to play unless the B-sample clears them, which seems unlikely.

Vegas still has Clemson -13 FWIW

richardjackson199
12-24-2018, 08:43 PM
Bama also suspended 3 players including a starter, but I don't think it will affect them at all:

http://www.espn.com/college-football/story/_/id/25610190/alabama-crimson-tide-suspends-3-players-including-starting-ol-deonte-brown-orange-bowl

And on that note, Tua said he expects to be 100% and not limited at all.

Vegas has Bama -14

HereBeforeCoachK
12-25-2018, 08:06 AM
Agreed. But after reading Dabo's comments in the article, I believe Dabo that these players probably did nothing intentionally to juice. Sounds like they did something like buy the wrong Monster drink at the 7-11. But they probably won't be able to play unless the B-sample clears them, which seems unlikely.

Vegas still has Clemson -13 FWIW

Are B-samples rarely dispositive? (I'm asking, I don't know).

richardjackson199
12-25-2018, 09:09 AM
Are B-samples rarely dispositive? (I'm asking, I don't know).

I have no clue about the B-sample likelihood of coming back negative after a positive A sample.

I interpretted the ESPN article and Mark Schlabach reporting that Clemson expects not to have these players available. But no clue what the percentage likelihood of that would be.

Maybe not relevant, but when doctors test for something like HIV, the first test is different than the second test. The first test is very sensitive, basically meaning that it probably won't miss true HIV if it's there. But the test could be a false positive.

So they get a second different test which has high "specificity." This basically means that if it says it's positive, it's almost definitely positive for true HIV. But they wouldn't do that test first because it wouldn't catch more true HIV cases because the test is not as sensitive. If someone has true HIV and gets tested, you don't want to miss it. So you first use a highly "sensitive" test for screening and then a second highly specific test for confirmation (only if the first test was positive).

Sensitivity and specificity are concepts they love to always put on doctors' and medical students' board exams.

But with this A-sample B-sample test thing for performance enhancing drugs, I have no clue if it's using the same concept. Maybe the B sample is just a separate urine sample that undergoes the same test as the A-sample? In that case, I would think it's fairly likely for the B sample to also be positive. If the B-sample test indeed undergoes a separate test with higher specificity and lower sensitivity, then there is a higher chance that test would come back negative.

That's all I know - I really know nothing about the B-sample test in this case.

devildeac
12-25-2018, 09:20 AM
Maybe Clemson should have a buncha non-athletes submit urine for testing, that way, if some other regular students test positive...

Nah, never mind. Nothing like that would *ever* work. :rolleyes::mad:

jv001
12-25-2018, 09:24 AM
Maybe Clemson should have a buncha non-athletes submit urine for testing, that way, if some other regular students test positive...

Nah, never mind. Nothing like that would *ever* work. :rolleyes::mad:

I must spread some sporkz. Post of the day that cracked me up. A big "GODUKE" devildeac. Merry Christmas.

PackMan97
12-25-2018, 10:31 AM
It must be tough for Carolina fans to have their school brought up in conversation whenever there is talk of cheating.

With that thought, Merry Christmas to all and a happy 9f.

75Crazie
12-25-2018, 12:37 PM
It must be tough for Carolina fans to have their school brought up in conversation whenever there is talk of cheating.
When discussing anything that can be quantified, it is only natural to compare against the largest such existing example. To date, uNC cheating reigns supreme.

devildeac
12-25-2018, 12:40 PM
When discussing anything that can be quantified, it is only natural to compare against the largest such existing example. To date, uNC cheating reigns supreme.

Maybe they'll hang a banner...

Clipsfan
12-25-2018, 12:41 PM
Maybe Clemson should have a buncha non-athletes submit urine for testing, that way, if some other regular students test positive...

Nah, never mind. Nothing like that would *ever* work. :rolleyes::mad:

Very well said - made me laugh this holiday morning. Love how no mention is made of any other school but the inference is easy. Merry Xmas to all!

cspan37421
12-25-2018, 02:51 PM
Maybe Clemson should have a buncha non-athletes submit urine for testing, that way, if some other regular students test positive...

Nah, never mind. Nothing like that would *ever* work. :rolleyes::mad:

Exactly. If all students had access to the same 7-11 ....

Do some Monster energy drinks really have stuff in them that would cause a failed urine test? I had the feeling that was just one of those empty excuses.

OldPhiKap
12-25-2018, 03:06 PM
Alberto Contador blamed meat for his bad dope result in the TdF a few years ago. So maybe it was just hormones in the cattle from which their steaks came.

elvis14
12-26-2018, 10:42 PM
Not having Dexter on that d-line is a big deal for Clemson. When Dabo called him to tell him, Dexter thought coach was pulling his leg. He was surprised when coach told him he wasn't kidding.

richardjackson199
12-27-2018, 08:16 PM
http://www.espn.com/college-football/story/_/id/25627136/clemson-tigers-suspensions-upheld-b-samples-test-positive

fuse
12-27-2018, 09:10 PM
My son played against Dexter Lawrence in high school.

I don’t know him, I’ll just say I am disappointed in that it has been fun for me to see kids my son played with and against as DI players.

Being on the outside, its hard to know what the truth is beyond the facts of two failed drug tests.