PDA

View Full Version : MBB: Boston College 62, (1) Syracuse 59 (OT)



jimrowe0
02-19-2014, 08:55 PM
Here we go

moonpie23
02-19-2014, 08:58 PM
the orange have benefitted from 3 non-calls in a row, an and 1 and two str8 up fouls ...………50-50 going into OT

jimrowe0
02-19-2014, 08:59 PM
Cuse has been spiraling downward.

duke96
02-19-2014, 08:59 PM
Fair is ridiculous

duke4ever19
02-19-2014, 09:00 PM
Boy those are some ugly uniforms on Syracuse. Yikes. I guess it's the mismatch that is unsettling.

jimrowe0
02-19-2014, 09:01 PM
BC raining threes

jacone21
02-19-2014, 09:03 PM
C'mon octuple overtime!

duke96
02-19-2014, 09:03 PM
Ahh no need to shoot that 3

moonpie23
02-19-2014, 09:04 PM
BC crumbling….

jimrowe0
02-19-2014, 09:04 PM
Ahh no need to shoot that 3

Agreed, it was a two on one

moonpie23
02-19-2014, 09:08 PM
BC has got the orange playing way out…….the back door is open a lot…

jimrowe0
02-19-2014, 09:10 PM
Holy crap BC ball. Ennis threw it away

moonpie23
02-19-2014, 09:12 PM
Prepare to be hosed….

duke96
02-19-2014, 09:12 PM
Eesh Auburn just crumbled completely last 2 possessions. Pathetic.

Troublemaker
02-19-2014, 09:12 PM
Since initial ruling was BC touched it, I'm not sure they will overturn using these replays.

jacone21
02-19-2014, 09:13 PM
Oh man. Unreal.

jimrowe0
02-19-2014, 09:13 PM
That is crap

moonpie23
02-19-2014, 09:14 PM
man, i hate being right

jwillfan
02-19-2014, 09:14 PM
Home cooking

duke96
02-19-2014, 09:15 PM
Silent G!? What was that??

FerryFor50
02-19-2014, 09:15 PM
Bad call on that turnover. Plus they missed the Ennis travel when he faked the 3 and drove.

FerryFor50
02-19-2014, 09:17 PM
Lonnie Jackson = stones

Syracuse luck finally runs out.

moonpie23
02-19-2014, 09:17 PM
it's OVAH!!!!!!!

jimrowe0
02-19-2014, 09:17 PM
BC baby

duke96
02-19-2014, 09:17 PM
Wow. BC couldn't buy a call and still pulled it off

duke4ever19
02-19-2014, 09:17 PM
Yes!!!!

luburch
02-19-2014, 09:17 PM
So Ennis wasn't all that great down the stretch...

Zephyrius
02-19-2014, 09:18 PM
i'm concerned we'll face a syracuse wanting redemption on saturday when we have sluggish legs

toughbuff1
02-19-2014, 09:18 PM
Lonnie "Ice Man" Jackson!

jacone21
02-19-2014, 09:18 PM
Well... their mojo ran out.

jipops
02-19-2014, 09:18 PM
Darn. I really wanted them undefeated coming to Cameron.

77devil
02-19-2014, 09:19 PM
Lots of home cooking in this one. BC survives despite Karl Hess. The out of bounds call was clearly wrong.

arnie
02-19-2014, 09:19 PM
Yes!!!!

The big thud- it will continue through the weekend.

Duvall
02-19-2014, 09:19 PM
i'm concerned we'll face a syracuse wanting redemption on saturday when we have sluggish legs

Or a Syracuse team that hasn't played a good game in three weeks. Which they haven't.

jipops
02-19-2014, 09:19 PM
i'm concerned we'll face a syracuse wanting redemption on saturday when we have sluggish legs

Nah, we'll take care of business.

duke4ever19
02-19-2014, 09:22 PM
The big thud- it will continue through the weekend.

Yep, we can kick them on their way down.

FerryFor50
02-19-2014, 09:22 PM
Or a Syracuse team that hasn't played a good game in three weeks. Which they haven't.

That's a bingo!


http://youtu.be/Ugpg8XruhVk

bbosbbos
02-19-2014, 09:23 PM
W/o ref's help, cuse had lost to us, ncst and pitt (twice). Cuse is a good team, but never great in this season. They were just lucky. My 2 cents.

Ggallagher
02-19-2014, 09:23 PM
Well, a lot of folks have commented that Syracuse was getting by on luck in their close games - maybe they've used up ALL their good luck now ??

sagegrouse
02-19-2014, 09:23 PM
The girlfriends of the Syracuse players delivered a collective ultimatum about the uniforms, and it so dispirited the Orange (the "Big Red" given those unis?), it lost to one of the worst teams in the country.

IBleedBlue
02-19-2014, 09:25 PM
W/o ref's help, cuse had lost to us, ncst and pitt (twice). Cuse is a good team, but never great in this season. They were just lucky. My 2 cents.
Syracuse still has 4 more road games to go. Now, they will know what it is to play on the road in ACC. They have been sitting pretty at the dome so far. And the last 4 road games are against us, Maryland, Virginia and FSU.
They are built to lose all 4.

-jk
02-19-2014, 09:25 PM
An infamous "trap game".

-jk

bbosbbos
02-19-2014, 09:27 PM
Then uva is the regular season no. 1 if that is the case.


Syracuse still has 4 more road games to go. Now, they will know what it is to play on the road in ACC. They have been sitting pretty at the dome so far. And the last 4 road games are against us, Maryland, Virginia and FSU.
They are built to lose all 4.

NashvilleDevil
02-19-2014, 09:28 PM
i'm concerned we'll face a syracuse wanting redemption on saturday when we have sluggish legs

Stop being concerned. Duke will be ready for them on Saturday.

burnspbesq
02-19-2014, 09:29 PM
So, BC has three ACC wins: two over VPISU ... and at Cuse.

Welcome to the ACC, Orange.

TNIAAM should be as bad as IC right about now.

bbosbbos
02-19-2014, 09:29 PM
BC was ranked high in the pre-season acc polls. They have the ability to beat most acc teams.


An infamous "trap game".

-jk

Troublemaker
02-19-2014, 09:30 PM
IF we take care of business in Chapel Hill tomorrow, I think I'll allow myself to dream about that ACC regular season title share again (while knowing that the ACC Tournament is far more important regardless.) This Syracuse loss to BC may allow us to root for Syracuse at UVA.

All moot without a win in Chapel Hill tomorrow, though.

bbosbbos
02-19-2014, 09:30 PM
Go Duke!


IF we take care of business in Chapel Hill tomorrow, I think I'll allow myself to dream about that ACC regular season title share again (while knowing that the ACC Tournament is far more important regardless.) This Syracuse loss to BC may allow us to root for Syracuse at UVA.

All moot without a win in Chapel Hill tomorrow, though.

hurleyfor3
02-19-2014, 09:31 PM
An infamous "trap game".

http://forums.dukebasketballreport.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=2433&d=1330362896

IBleedBlue
02-19-2014, 09:32 PM
Then uva is the regular season no. 1 if that is the case.

I would agree that UVA is looking more and more to lock up the ACC Reg season. Our first two losses to start conference games are definitely hurting right now.

CameronDuke
02-19-2014, 09:33 PM
IF we take care of business in Chapel Hill tomorrow, I think I'll allow myself to dream about that ACC regular season title share again (while knowing that the ACC Tournament is far more important regardless.) This Syracuse loss to BC may allow us to root for Syracuse at UVA.

All moot without a win in Chapel Hill tomorrow, though.

Cuse and UVa both have one loss in the ACC. I'm assuming we beat Cuse so with a win at uva, uva and Cuse would both have 2 ACC losses. We have 3. How would we get a share of the ACC regular season title?

andyw715
02-19-2014, 09:33 PM
An infamous "trap game".

-jk

No such thing.

My beloved Orange have just been playing so called "efficient" yet crappy offense since ACC play started, save the Duke game.

I'm still excited for Saturdays game. Can't wait to drive up from Wilmington for it!!

mgtr
02-19-2014, 09:34 PM
I don't understand the unis -- they look like something a Y-league team would cobble together. Or, perhaps they were honoring the Salvation Army!

Troublemaker
02-19-2014, 09:36 PM
Cuse and UVa both have one loss in the ACC. I'm assuming we beat Cuse so with a win at uva, uva and Cuse would both have 2 ACC losses. We have 3. How would we get a share of the ACC regular season title?

Add UVA loss @ Maryland and Cuse loss @ Maryland or @FSU.

The key to all this is we need to be able to root for one of UVA/Cuse when they play. They can't both lose that game!

As I said a week or so ago, the Terps might end up being our greatest ally this season.

NashvilleDevil
02-19-2014, 09:37 PM
I would agree that UVA is looking more and more to lock up the ACC Reg season. Our first two losses to start conference games are definitely hurting right now.

They are hurting in the sense that Duke is probably out of the running for the regular season title but those two loses may be the reason why Duke ends up in Dallas this year.

bbosbbos
02-19-2014, 09:40 PM
wow, does terp have any chance to go dance? If they have, they will fight hard. Otherwise I do not think they will have the motivation to beat uva or cuse


Add UVA loss @ Maryland and Cuse loss @ Maryland or @FSU.

The key to all this is we need to be able to root for one of UVA/Cuse when they play. They can't both lose that game!

As I said a week or so ago, the Terps might end up being our greatest ally this season.

IBleedBlue
02-19-2014, 09:41 PM
They are hurting in the sense that Duke is probably out of the running for the regular season title but those two loses may be the reason why Duke ends up in Dallas this year.

Agreed. This teams game face changed drastically after the first two losses. It is ok to go anywhere to play NCAA as long as it is not west coast. Flying to west coast and then facing Arizona in either s16 or e8 is a bad recipe.

hurleyfor3
02-19-2014, 09:41 PM
Cuse and UVa both have one loss in the ACC. I'm assuming we beat Cuse so with a win at uva, uva and Cuse would both have 2 ACC losses. We have 3. How would we get a share of the ACC regular season title?

Say Duke wins out, Cuse loses at UVa (plus Cuse will have lost to us) and UVa loses two of their other three remaining games. All three would be tied at 15-3. Cuse would be eliminated in the mini-conference standings (us 2-1, UVa 1-1, Cuse 1-2) and we would win the head-to-head against UVa.

Tall order for UVa to lose two and beat Syracuse, of course. However, if the issue is to get at least the #2 seed, if both we and UVa beat Cuse we would win the tiebreaker against BOTH UVa AND Cuse.

CameronDuke
02-19-2014, 09:42 PM
Add UVA loss @ Maryland and Cuse loss @ Maryland or @FSU.

The key to all this is we need to be able to root for one of UVA/Cuse when they play. They can't both lose that game!

As I said a week or so ago, the Terps might end up being our greatest ally this season.

I don't see uva losing at Maryland nor Cuse losing again this regular season except against Duke but as we saw tonight crazier things have happened!

And if Duke and Cuse both finish with 3 losses who gets the tie breaker assuming we split with Cuse?

bbosbbos
02-19-2014, 09:42 PM
Love what you said. Those 2 loses are the turning point of our season. From there K starts to make changes and D is picking up.


They are hurting in the sense that Duke is probably out of the running for the regular season title but those two loses may be the reason why Duke ends up in Dallas this year.

weezie
02-19-2014, 09:43 PM
Bobby Knight enjoying a rare little smile tonight.....

CameronDuke
02-19-2014, 09:52 PM
Say Duke wins out, Cuse loses at UVa (plus Cuse will have lost to us) and UVa loses two of their other three remaining games. All three would be tied at 15-3. Cuse would be eliminated in the mini-conference standings (us 2-1, UVa 1-1, Cuse 1-2) and we would win the head-to-head against UVa.

Tall order for UVa to lose two and beat Syracuse, of course. However, if the issue is to get at least the #2 seed, if both we and UVa beat Cuse we would win the tiebreaker against BOTH UVa AND Cuse.

Tall order for Duke to win out but I have faith in Coach K and this team! I believe!

Duvall
02-19-2014, 09:53 PM
Anyway, what this loss *really* does is crack the door open a bit for Duke to go to MSG as a #1 or #2 seed.

Troublemaker
02-19-2014, 09:55 PM
I don't see uva losing at Maryland nor Cuse losing again this regular season except against Duke but as we saw tonight crazier things have happened!

And if Duke and Cuse both finish with 3 losses who gets the tie breaker assuming we split with Cuse?

If Clemson finishes higher than Cuse's 3rd-loss-opponent, then Cuse gets the 1 seed. Otherwise, Duke would. But in the record books, regardless of ACCT seeding, they would both receive credit for a "regular season title."

Also, obviously none of this is likely and I'm getting way ahead of myself. It's just I had completely shut the door on it, and now it's slightly ajar with this unexpected result tonight.

hurleyfor3
02-19-2014, 09:56 PM
Anyway, what this loss *really* does is crack the door open a bit for Duke to go to MSG as a #1 or #2 seed.

So we really are having the damned thing in New York. Huh.

freshmanjs
02-19-2014, 09:56 PM
So we really are having the damned thing in New York. Huh.

he means the east regional

duketaylor
02-19-2014, 10:11 PM
ACC Tourney is Greensboro, unless I'm missing something. Let's enjoy THAT while it lasts!! At least it won't (shouldn't) ever return to Verizon Center.

Duvall
02-19-2014, 10:19 PM
ACC Tourney is Greensboro, unless I'm missing something. Let's enjoy THAT while it lasts!! At least it won't (shouldn't) ever return to Verizon Center.

Shouldn't, but will in 2016.

Troublemaker
02-19-2014, 10:20 PM
Anyway, what this loss *really* does is crack the door open a bit for Duke to go to MSG as a #1 or #2 seed.

Agreed. NCAAT seeding implications are even more important than my regular season share blatherings (that probably only make sense in my head.)

UrinalCake
02-19-2014, 10:26 PM
So if UVA wins the conference, then would it actually be better to be the 4 seed in the ACCT than the 2 or the 3? Despite their struggles I still fear Syracuse more than UVA. Thus I'd rather play UVA in the semifinals and Syracuse in the finals than vice versa.

Seeding-wise there's not much difference between 2 or 3, assuming you win on Friday of course.

Duvall
02-19-2014, 10:28 PM
So if UVA wins the conference, then would it actually be better to be the 4 seed in the ACCT than the 2 or the 3? Despite their struggles I still fear Syracuse more than UVA. Thus I'd rather play UVA in the semifinals and Syracuse in the finals than vice versa.

Seeding-wise there's not much difference between 2 or 3, assuming you win on Friday of course.

Big dropoff from likely 5-seed Pitt to whoever are the 6 and 7-seeds, though.

-bdbd
02-19-2014, 10:30 PM
Add UVA loss @ Maryland and Cuse loss @ Maryland or @FSU.

The key to all this is we need to be able to root for one of UVA/Cuse when they play. They can't both lose that game!

As I said a week or so ago, the Terps might end up being our greatest ally this season.

Good, just as long as they're not our "rival!"

;)



The key thing for Duke is to ensure that we finish the regular season among the ACC's top-4, so we get byes into the ACCT quarterfinals. Really prefer to get top-3 and not have to face Syracuse until the finals. Right now the odds are that we finish third, but still a long way to go, for sure.

Troublemaker
02-19-2014, 10:38 PM
So if UVA wins the conference, then would it actually be better to be the 4 seed in the ACCT than the 2 or the 3?

Nah, because then we're talking about at least one loss to UNC. I can't see Duke slipping to a 4 seed while still sweeping UNC. So, it can't really be preferable to receiving a 2 or 3 seed...

BlueDevilBrowns
02-19-2014, 10:49 PM
Nah, because then we're talking about at least one loss to UNC. I can't see Duke slipping to a 4 seed while still sweeping UNC. So, it can't really be preferable to receiving a 2 or 3 seed...

Also, if the top 4 finished 1.UVA 2.SYRACUSE 3.DUKE 4.UNC, this would allow us to more likely play the Orange in, hopefully, the rubber match that could give us the edge over them in NCAAT seeding if we were to beat them a 2nd time(hence being able to be a #1 or #2 in the East).

For us to get preference over Syracuse, as far as regional seeding goes, we need to defeat them 2 out of 3, IMO. Of course, if they drop a couple more games between now and March, it may not matter.

kAzE
02-20-2014, 12:42 AM
Also, if the top 4 finished 1.UVA 2.SYRACUSE 3.DUKE 4.UNC, this would allow us to more likely play the Orange in, hopefully, the rubber match that could give us the edge over them in NCAAT seeding if we were to beat them a 2nd time(hence being able to be a #1 or #2 in the East).

We still need to beat them the first time . . . and coming off a loss, with 4 days of rest, that's going to be a tough game for us.

throatybeard
02-20-2014, 01:28 AM
Y'all, lets be honest about season priorities.

1) National Championship

2) ACC Championship

3) How you did against Carolina. I'm tempted to raise this above (2), but our Polish Leader has talked me out of that in numerous public appearances. I sympathize if you put this above (2) though.

47) Any increment of losing in your region. I seriously don't care whether we lose to Lehigh in R64 or Louisville in R8. If you don't make the FF, which is basically staged as a nearly-separate event, what does it matter? Is it cool that we made the S16 every year between 1998 and 2006? Sure. But at the end of the day, you don't have a FF appearance, an ACC championship, or a national title, and you have nasty UNC fans lighting you up every time you have the gall to buy groceries.

JamminJoe
02-20-2014, 02:03 AM
This thread is calling the Weauf gods. We haven't even gotten past UNC, and everyone is talking about Syracuse or UVa getting 3 losses.

jjasper0729
02-20-2014, 08:10 AM
9 times out of 10, Syracuse will win that game. However, they double dipped with tempting the basketball gods by 1) wearing mismatched colors in their jerseys and 2) not wearing white at home (thereby removing the home court advantage)

Those have to have been the worst combination. Who at Nike thought that would look good? It would have been fine if they were all orange (jersey and shorts) and if they were playing on the road. Even ours though, I thought could have used a blue panel on the side (like the 1991-92 and 2001 jerseys had anyway), but I digress.

Saratoga2
02-20-2014, 08:42 AM
9 times out of 10, Syracuse will win that game. However, they double dipped with tempting the basketball gods by 1) wearing mismatched colors in their jerseys and 2) not wearing white at home (thereby removing the home court advantage)

Those have to have been the worst combination. Who at Nike thought that would look good? It would have been fine if they were all orange (jersey and shorts) and if they were playing on the road. Even ours though, I thought could have used a blue panel on the side (like the 1991-92 and 2001 jerseys had anyway), but I digress.

Syracuse have been skating on thin ice since the Duke game and the odds finally caught up with them. They are vulnerable and other teams will have a shot at them. They still are a good team and haven't as yet suffered serious injuries.

As far AS Duke is concerned, I am more concerned with UNC than Syracuse at this point.

freshmanjs
02-20-2014, 08:55 AM
We still need to beat them the first time . . . and coming off a loss, with 4 days of rest, that's going to be a tough game for us.

they dont have 4 days of rest.

Kfanarmy
02-20-2014, 12:11 PM
I was a bit shocked to see on the net this morning that BC had pulled the upset...not because Cuse was upset, they've played a ton of close games, but because it was BC.

I'm a bit curious why a team who is 14 in adjusted offense, and 15 in adjusted defense according to KP, is having such a hard time pulling away from their opponents. I agree with others who've said Syracuse is lucky, primarily because they had been in so many close games recently and came out on top. Perhaps they are simply are having a multi-game shooting slump? Does it have more to do with the pace they are playing at? Or does it really reveal the ACC schedule, the Cuse played their first 5 ACC games against the bottom of the ACC this year. (Yes UNC doesn't fit there now, but I included them because at the time they were at the botttom: in crisis mode; chaotic, hadn't dealt with the loss of a star player, getting hammered in the press...) IDK, but if I were a serious Cuse fan looking back and forward at their schedule, I'd expect a couple of more losses.

hurleyfor3
02-20-2014, 12:16 PM
This thread is calling the Weauf gods. We haven't even gotten past UNC, and everyone is talking about Syracuse or UVa getting 3 losses.

Someone asked about ACC Tournament seeding and I answered. No one is presupposing any particular outcome, and I explicitly wrote, "Tall order for UVa to lose two and beat Syracuse".

sagegrouse
02-20-2014, 12:17 PM
I was a bit shocked to see on the net this morning that BC had pulled the upset...not because Cuse was upset, they've played a ton of close games, but because it was BC.

I'm a bit curious why a team who is 14 in adjusted offense, and 15 in adjusted defense according to KP, is have such a hard time pulling away from their opponents. I agree with others who've said Syracuse is lucky, primarily because they had been in so many close games recently and came out on top. Perhaps they are simply are having a multi-game shooting slump? Does it have more to do with the pace they are playing at? Or does it really reveal the ACC schedule, the Cuse played their first 5 ACC games against the bottom of the ACC this year. (Yes UNC doesn't fit there now, but I included them because at the time they were at the botttom: in crisis mode; chaotic, hadn't dealt with the loss of a star player, getting hammered in the press...) IDK, but if I were a serious Cuse fan looking back and forward at their schedule, I'd expect a couple of more losses.

IMHO (where the H is silent) Syracuse is a very, very good team going through a spell of poor play, including the previous close call against State. Its offense against BC was pitiful, shooting 20-62 (32%) and 2-12 (17%). The Orange will soon come out of it (not Saturday, I hope). But I personally don't believe they were ever the best team in the country.

CDu
02-20-2014, 05:09 PM
Syracuse is a weird team. They have just one ballhandler, just one really good outside shooter ( and a streaky one at that), just one true scorer, and no post offense. It is amazing that they are able to score with any consistency. Prrhaps that is a tribute to Ennis and maybe their ability to offensive rebound?

Kedsy
02-20-2014, 05:18 PM
Syracuse is a weird team. They have just one ballhandler, just one really good outside shooter ( and a streaky one at that), just one true scorer, and no post offense. It is amazing that they are able to score with any consistency. Prrhaps that is a tribute to Ennis and maybe their ability to offensive rebound?

I think you've hit it. If you look at the four factors, they are 11th in the country in OR%; 137th in free throw rate; 199th in eFG%; and 15th (lowest) in TO%.

Duvall
02-20-2014, 05:21 PM
I think you've hit it. If you look at the four factors, they are 11th in the country in OR%; 137th in free throw rate; 199th in eFG%; and 15th (lowest) in TO%.

Pfft. Like you could win a national championship with offensive rebounding and avoiding turnovers.

Wander
02-20-2014, 05:31 PM
Pfft. Like you could win a national championship with offensive rebounding and avoiding turnovers.

Haha, fair comparison, but we were a much better shooting team.

Duvall
02-20-2014, 05:39 PM
Haha, fair comparison, but we were a much better shooting team.

Deeper, too. Or rather, equally deep with much better injury luck. But if Fair were to go on a hot streak like Singler's it could get interesting.

TexHawk
02-20-2014, 05:49 PM
Can this one take over for my team's loss to TCU last year as the most wtf loss this century? TCU was a much much worse team than BC, but Cuse lost this one with a homecourt advantage, while the KU loss was in Texas. I have to think that fact puts them somewhere in the same ballpark, and KU wasn't #1 at the time.

I am looking for anything to put that loss out to pasture, so somebody please agree with me.

Kedsy
02-20-2014, 06:42 PM
Haha, fair comparison, but we were a much better shooting team.

The 2010 Duke team was a much better three-point shooting team, but wasn't so hot at 2-point shooting. Syracuse's overall FG% (44.8%) was actually better than 2010 Duke's (44.2%) but because that Duke team attempted more threes than this year's Syracuse team and also shot those threes pretty well, its eFG% (50.5%) was a little better than Syracuse's eFG% (49.6%).

hurleyfor3
02-20-2014, 06:49 PM
Can this one take over for my team's loss to TCU last year as the most wtf loss this century? TCU was a much much worse team than BC, but Cuse lost this one with a homecourt advantage, while the KU loss was in Texas. I have to think that fact puts them somewhere in the same ballpark, and KU wasn't #1 at the time.

I am looking for anything to put that loss out to pasture, so somebody please agree with me.

George Mason over UConn was pretty high up there on the WTF scale, as was Butler (not as good as in the previous year) over Pitt. With the stakes much higher in both cases.

tbyers11
02-20-2014, 07:01 PM
Can this one take over for my team's loss to TCU last year as the most wtf loss this century? TCU was a much much worse team than BC, but Cuse lost this one with a homecourt advantage, while the KU loss was in Texas. I have to think that fact puts them somewhere in the same ballpark, and KU wasn't #1 at the time.

I am looking for anything to put that loss out to pasture, so somebody please agree with me.

Well, KenPom says that KU was favored by 20 (97% win) @TCU last year while Syr was favored by 19 (96% win). So, technically KU's loss was worse but since I like you and I think Syracuse's home court advantage might be worth a little more than the average I think I'll rule in your favor.

Also, IIRC, TCU jumped to a big lead in the game and had home court momentum (whatever that might be in Fort Worth) while Syracuse was up 8 at half and never trailed until about the 6 minute mark of the 2nd half.

I'll cite this Syr-BC game as the most WTF loss going forward :D

CDu
02-20-2014, 11:49 PM
Well, at least now we don't have to watch the 45-42 Syracuse/UVa game with bated breath...