throatybeard
09-29-2010, 02:43 PM
Arthur Penn is gone.
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/30/movies/30penn.html?hp
I think I have Bonnie and Clyde on the DVR, so I'll make a point of seeing it again when I get home.
I've always loved both of Ebert's reviews, his original [positive] one that went against the grain of the reception at the time, and his later, "Great Movies" one.
1967
http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.d...VIEWS/709250301 (http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/19670925/REVIEWS/709250301)
1998
http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.d.../401010306/1023 (http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/19980803/REVIEWS08/401010306/1023)
Today, the freshness of "Bonnie and Clyde'' has been absorbed in countless other films, and it's hard to see how fresh and original it felt in 1967 -- just as the impact of "Citizen Kane,'' in 1941, may not be obvious to those raised in the shadow of its influence.
When I saw it, I had been a film critic for less than six months, and it was the first masterpiece I had seen on the job. I felt an exhilaration beyond describing. I did not suspect how long it would be between such experiences, but at least I learned that they were possible.
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/30/movies/30penn.html?hp
I think I have Bonnie and Clyde on the DVR, so I'll make a point of seeing it again when I get home.
I've always loved both of Ebert's reviews, his original [positive] one that went against the grain of the reception at the time, and his later, "Great Movies" one.
1967
http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.d...VIEWS/709250301 (http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/19670925/REVIEWS/709250301)
1998
http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.d.../401010306/1023 (http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/19980803/REVIEWS08/401010306/1023)
Today, the freshness of "Bonnie and Clyde'' has been absorbed in countless other films, and it's hard to see how fresh and original it felt in 1967 -- just as the impact of "Citizen Kane,'' in 1941, may not be obvious to those raised in the shadow of its influence.
When I saw it, I had been a film critic for less than six months, and it was the first masterpiece I had seen on the job. I felt an exhilaration beyond describing. I did not suspect how long it would be between such experiences, but at least I learned that they were possible.