Originally Posted by
GDT
If this is accurate I think they would have have had to have said the "GA was wrong" or "things are fine" PLUS "oh, by the way, Sandusky is not allowed to use our facilities with young people anymore". Which I find a little more difficult to accept at face value, personally.
I'm not sure that the timing of Sandusky's loss of privileges coincides with the first reporting by the GA. I don't think it does. My scenario was only one of several that would still allow Paterno to be without fault (until hindsight is factored in). I'm just trying to inject a bit of caution to the thread. Unless you think Paterno is also a liar, his expanded comments, noted in a previous post, would seem to support my assertion that he did not think the allegations were true at the time. How he arrived at this conclusion is less clear. It is looking likely that the GA didn't go into details of what he saw with JoePa that he did later with others. If it pleases you to believe the worst, then go ahead. We're just speculating, after all.
Man, if your Mom made you wear that color when you were a baby, and you're still wearing it, it's time to grow up!