I saw that, too, and was unable to turn my eyes away from the train wreck. Bissinger is a good writer, but he looked like a pretty small person last night. He was practically frothing at the mouth. His ranting did a disservice to his profession, and will turn more people away from print media than bring them back. By far. If you want to portray your medium as the one where adults and responsible people rule, where you can't stoop to petty anger and ill-informed ranting with no one to answer to, you shouldn't go on HBO and vomit up a condescending, expletive-laden hissy-fit all over the place.
I think deadspin is pretty much worthless, and Leitch seems like kind of a weasel. He can say what he wants on TV but there's no question what he's going for with his site, that it aims very low and that he allows it to be that way. I think it's deplorable he has so much readership, but I'm guessing his hits are through the roof today because of Bissinger.
It's too bad they didn't have a better blog writer to present what internet-based sportswriting can be. Take just the baseball realm, where almost every team now has some fan who's a serious sabermetrician writing a blog with analysis that puts the local paper's beat writer to shame. Either because that guy's stuck in the past and thinks the game's still in the '70's and obsesses over steroids, or because he's too busy actually reporting and producing the news analysts get to analyze to spend time churning win-shares and VORP columns.
Even someone like Bill Simmons would do. There's a guy who came from a print background and changed to the web, who has a distinctive voice and perspective (it's gotten to be a tiring one for me and I don't read him anymore, but there's no denying he's a different breed of sportswriter that appeals to a different generation), and a huge readership, and doesn't go out there slandering everyone with nothing to back it up.
Anyway, your point is right on. There is just as high a ratio of insipid garbage in your average print paper's daily sports opinion columns as there is on the net. The writing tends to be atrociously pedestrian, the tone bitter and cynical, the humor groan-inducing, the ideas recycled to the point where you can read the first graph and know how it ends. For every 1 Frank Deford there's 15 of Pat Reusse and Jay Mariotti and the rest. And the comment sections on newspaper online sections and ESPN.com are just as bad, if not worse, than the reader comments they tried to hang on Leitch.
My only takeaway from the segment was a newfound respect for Braylon Edwards. He's now my favorite WR in the NFL. Well-spoken, modest, kept his cool, thoughtful.