Originally Posted by
houstondukie
I may be biased since that was the best duke team during my college days, but I don't feel like we talk about the 2004 team as much as they deserve.
Duke started the season just 3-0 before losing to Purdue in Maui but then the very next game they blewout a top 5 Michigan St. team @ their place, destroyed highly ranked Texas by 28 in MSG (the yr. before Redick went for 40+) then Duke started the ACC regular season on fire, going undefeated for a long time (21-1; 10-0) including beating UNC (May, Felton, McCants) at Chapel Hill (Duhon's layup).
They had 6 NBA players (Duhon, Redick, Ewing, Deng, Sheldon Williams and Shavlik Randolph), 2 of which had their numbers retired, and another who we all agree that had he stayed for more than 1 yr. he would have had his retired too (Deng). Plus, we had a great captain/leader/pg who won the national championship his freshmen yr. and who we all grew to love cheering for (Duhon).
Despite all that, they ran into a better UCONN team (Okafor, Ben Gordon) who we nonetheless should have beaten if not for some bad calls, bad luck (UCONN made everything down the stetch) and a semi-choke job by Duke (pains me to admit it but we went ice cold at the end). We all knew that game was pretty much for the national championship (GT was a very good team who even beat us once in the regular season at home, but we knew we had a great shot of beating them).
The 1999 Duke team who also lost to UCONN, this time in the real national championship game, who also had many many NBA players (better overall compared to the 2004 ones), was one of the most dominant, if not most dominant, Duke teams. They certainly are the best Duke team to not win a national championship. We talk about them a lot and we should.
But why don't we also talk about that 2004 team very much? Has any Duke team since then make you feel like Duke could actually win the national championship? How I miss those days (maybe next yr?)