View Poll Results: Who will win the West Region?

Voters
140. You may not vote on this poll
  • UCLA

    54 38.57%
  • Duke

    80 57.14%
  • Xavier

    0 0%
  • UConn

    2 1.43%
  • Drake

    2 1.43%
  • Purdue

    1 0.71%
  • West Virginia

    0 0%
  • BYU

    0 0%
  • Texas A&M

    1 0.71%
  • Arizona

    0 0%
  • Baylor

    0 0%
  • WKy, San Diego, Georgia, Belmont, Miss Valley St

    0 0%
Page 3 of 15 FirstFirst 1234513 ... LastLast
Results 41 to 60 of 289
  1. #41
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Quote Originally Posted by devildownunder View Post
    Why do you want Ucla? I think that's a horrendous matchup for us. It would be nice to beat them but they're not on my list of teams I think we'd fare well against.
    Well, you have to play someone good in the regional final.

    UCLA has played four close games in the last couple of weeks, so maybe they're flirting with a loss. But even if not, Duke can worry about them after trying to make it through the first three rounds.

  2. #42
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Washington DC

    DC will be nice

    What time is the game Thursday?

    I like our matchups. Xavier at #3 is favorable compared to others and WVU/AZ is also doable.

    Super "Survive and Advance" Dave

  3. #43
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Quote Originally Posted by devildownunder View Post
    Let's see, the Big Ten got four bids. Certainly not a banner year.
    I'm not saying I disagree. Just making an observation.

  4. #44
    Quote Originally Posted by houstondukie View Post
    Because they have absolutely no guard depth. NONE.

    Yes, they are loaded up front with Love and company, but you got to play somebody to get to the final four. Did you think they just handout final fours?

    If not UCLA, do you think we match up better with Kansas or Memphis?
    Who are Miami and Wake's backup guards? I like our chances against UCLA, but Collison alone is a handfull...

  5. #45
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Allawah, NSW Australia (near Sydney)
    Quote Originally Posted by houstondukie View Post
    Because they have absolutely no guard depth. NONE.

    Yes, they are loaded up front with Love and company, but you got to play somebody to get to the final four. Did you think they just handout final fours?

    If not UCLA, do you think we match up better with Kansas or Memphis?


    I think our best matchup out of the No.1s is the heels. ha! But of the teams you mentioned I guess Ucla isn't such a bad choice. It's tempting to say Memphis because I think they are extremely vulnerable to slow tempo and a half-court style but I don't think we have the personnel to exploit that.

  6. #46

    I love it

    I love our draw and I love playing in DC. Takes a little pressure off not playing in the same building as UNC, feels like an ACC road trip, and the competition on that part of the bracket isn't that great compared to some others. I think the West is the weakest bracket overall. Let's get through next weekend then see what happens!

  7. #47
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Virginia
    All in all, I think that Duke has a very reasonable draw. Either W.Va or Arizona will be challenging but if we play like we are capable we should be able to beat them. I don't know a lot about Xavier but I'm pretty sure I would rather play them than Louisville, Stanford or Wisconsin. I'm not sure that UCLA would be my first choice to the #1 opposite us but they have looked fairly mortal the last couple of weeks and at this point don't know how realistic a F4 run is for Duke this year.

    One thing to keep in mind is that 3 final fours in a row is pretty rare and very difficult. This could play to Duke's advantage (if we can return to form and start playing like we did earlier this year).

    Here's to hoping that K is able to rest and rebuild the teams psychy over the next several days. A healthy Henderson and a more confident and rested Singler will be needed!

  8. #48
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Washington DC

    Starting Lineups

    Does anyone think K will switch things up and move Scheyer/Zoubek/Smith into the starting lineup and bring Singler/Henderson/Thomas off the bench just to get the team feisty? Singler is a little banged up and switching things up could give them a new feel and light a fire.

  9. #49
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    New Orleans, Louisiana

    Ucla

    Not trying to jinx us by assuming we get this far. But the key is how we do against UCLA's defense. They do not have a prolific offense at all and seem to win most of their games scoring in the 60s or low 70s. Hopefully if we get that far K can figure something out to get our offense back on track.

    Tchoupitoulas

  10. #50

    interesting

    Quote Originally Posted by superdave View Post
    Does anyone think K will switch things up and move Scheyer/Zoubek/Smith into the starting lineup and bring Singler/Henderson/Thomas off the bench just to get the team feisty? Singler is a little banged up and switching things up could give them a new feel and light a fire.
    That sounds like an interesting tactic. I think Singler would respond. Typically not a NCAA tourney tactic, but I bet it would work.

  11. #51
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Quote Originally Posted by devildownunder View Post
    that game was months ago. wisky has played 10 straight. But it looks like the committee gave us a ton of credit for what we did the first three months of the season. Good for us.

    Considering the circumstances, I don't think we can be in any way disappointed with our fate this march.
    The committee also realized that the Big 10 is awful. Look where all the Big 10 teams got seeded -- lower than just about everyone expected.

  12. #52
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Virginia
    Quote Originally Posted by superdave View Post
    Does anyone think K will switch things up and move Scheyer/Zoubek/Smith into the starting lineup and bring Singler/Henderson/Thomas off the bench just to get the team feisty? Singler is a little banged up and switching things up could give them a new feel and light a fire.
    I would be surprised to see Scheyer in for Henderson due to his wrist. I would like to see Zoubek get the starting nod over Singler to take some of the pressure off him but then you have Zoubec and Thomas playing together and I'm not sure how that would work.

  13. #53
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Quote Originally Posted by houstondukie View Post
    Because they have absolutely no guard depth. NONE.

    Yes, they are loaded up front with Love and company, but you got to play somebody to get to the final four. Did you think they just handout final fours?

    If not UCLA, do you think we match up better with Kansas or Memphis?
    One game at a time, please. I'll be thrilled with the opportunity to play UCLA.

  14. #54
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Brookline, MA
    Quote Originally Posted by Jumbo View Post
    One game at a time, please. I'll be thrilled with the opportunity to play UCLA.
    Well said Jumbo. Everyone should take the Coach K approach: The NCAA Tournament is really 3 4-team tournaments. We have to win the first one this weekend to get to the next one. Survive and advance.

  15. #55
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Quote Originally Posted by Jumbo View Post
    The committee also realized that the Big 10 is awful. Look where all the Big 10 teams got seeded -- lower than just about everyone expected.
    Yes, the Big 10 is horrible. Surprising that IU got that 8 seed, though. Most of us in Big 10 country thought Purdue and MSU would be in the 5/6 range.

    The real surprise to me (and I'm not saying I disagree) is that Wisconsin-the champion of both the regular season and tourney-only got a 3. That tells you what respect (or lackthereof) the Big 10 gets nationally.

  16. #56

    Florida

    Did I miss them in the brackets or did they actually not make it?

  17. #57
    i think this is as good as we could have wanted.

    still have to play the games, though.

  18. #58
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Hudson Valley

    the talking heads

    both at CBS and ESPN are saying that UCLA has the easiest path to the final four. hmmm

  19. #59
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Washington, DC
    Best case for me - I already had (good) tix to the games in DC! Now, I need to figure out when the game is . . .

  20. #60
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Allawah, NSW Australia (near Sydney)

    love d.c. as well

    Quote Originally Posted by SMO View Post
    I love our draw and I love playing in DC. Takes a little pressure off not playing in the same building as UNC, feels like an ACC road trip, and the competition on that part of the bracket isn't that great compared to some others. I think the West is the weakest bracket overall. Let's get through next weekend then see what happens!
    I never like it when we play in North Carolina. It's much better for us to be in the Northeast, ideally in New Jersey. I know many think it's more valuable to be close to home but playing in front of hostile crowds as a high seed in the first two rounds of the tourney can't be good for the players' mindset, can it?

Similar Threads

  1. March Madness conversation: MIDWEST Region
    By JasonEvans in forum Elizabeth King Forum
    Replies: 72
    Last Post: 03-25-2008, 12:06 AM
  2. March Madness conversation: EAST Region
    By JasonEvans in forum Elizabeth King Forum
    Replies: 69
    Last Post: 03-24-2008, 02:22 PM
  3. March Madness conversation: SOUTH Region
    By JasonEvans in forum Elizabeth King Forum
    Replies: 32
    Last Post: 03-23-2008, 04:55 PM
  4. Mac help for March Madness on Demand
    By bluebear in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 03-20-2008, 06:26 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •