This is a GREAT idea. I hope our Playcaller brings his expertise (and I'm using that phrase loosely ) to this table as often as possible.
I also hope he's got a sense of humor.
I don't know about the rest of you, but I'm thrilled at the idea that the Play Caller will be a regular and hopefully frequent columnist for DBR. This is a great idea, one that is long overdue.
Lots of the threads started here are caused by perceived errors in officiating. We rant, we rave, we say "Hansbrough gets all the calls." But many of us don't get the chance to see the game up close and, therefore, don't have much insight into what the officials are doing.
I found two statements in this opening column fascinating:
1. 'Once one grasps this division of labor and some of the more nuanced ideas that guide officials’ judgments, some very entertaining questions become readily accessible, such as why DeMarcus Nelson’s technical foul against Virginia Tech may have been the highest quality call of the year in the ACC' (can't wait to read that explanation!).
and
2. 'Most importantly, why Tyler Hansbrough gets away with traveling so often.
One of the things I truly love about DBR is how much I learn every time I read the threads. Jumbo, Jason, Bob, throaty, Julio... lots of these people know much more about basketball than I. But this will really give a unique perspective!
Once again, thanks DBR for being the best damn site on the whole Internet. I cannot imagine what I would do if I could no longer have you as my home page.
DukeDevilDeb
This is a GREAT idea. I hope our Playcaller brings his expertise (and I'm using that phrase loosely ) to this table as often as possible.
I also hope he's got a sense of humor.
I, for one, think that this is superfluous, what with Feldspar and all. I wouldn't want to be this guy if he should get one wrong!
I am really excited about the Play Caller so that we don't have to be subjected to Feldspar's lectures on officiating.
I too am exited about the Playcaller.
However, I dread the day when he tells us we have no reason to whine about the refs after a bad loss:
1) because he'd be right, and
2) because sometimes I need an excuse to keep my head from exploding.
I, for one, would love to know why our guys keep getting Ts for verbally (not physically) responding to blatantly hard fouls (e.g. Singler's T on Saturday).
I emailed Play Caller about the Gerald Henderson travel call in the UNC game that was discussed on the board. Here's an excerpt from his response...
I'll definitely be mentioning this play in a future column. The truth is that there's really not a whole lot to say. The best college official in the country, Tony Green, missed this one. He won't miss another one like that for a decade.
Follow me on Twitter
Websites: SCACCHoops.com, NCAAGameSim.com, NBAGameSim.com, NFLGameSim.com, and MLBGameSim.com
Two words: Lennie Wurtz!
~rthomas
I'd love to hear Play Caller's explanation for the end of the 'Nova/Georgetown game. For those who didn't see it, the game was tied. Nova had the last possession and Scottie Reynolds drove the lane. There was some contact but a probably good no-call. He made a bad pass, and with 1 second left Georgetown got the ball. The Georgetown player (Wallace I think) then went to dribble out the clock. With 0.1 seconds left he was barely bumped, and I mean barely. The ref called the blocking foul and Wallace made the free throw. Game over. I'd love to hear the rationale behind that call versus the no-call right before. It was a travesty, and the announcers were saying so. Terrible end to the game. In the words of the announcers, "awful."
That's Lenny Wirtz...
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/m...22/ai_20165859
I can tell from his article that he isn't Lenny Wirtz. He has too good a sense for the game. He must have played collegiate hoops somewhere.