ACC Player Ratings - Mid-Season
Last week, SeattleIrish mentioned a poster on IC who ran player ratings, and requested that someone try to post them over here. That poster's handle is unc92sax, and here are the ratings (note: I am just a messenger - I have no idea how the ratings are computed, other than what's mentioned below; used with unc92sax's permission).
A+ RATINGS
none
A RATINGS
1) .856 Lawson (UNC)
2) .842 Paulus (DU)
3) .807 Rivers (CU)
4) .765 Nelson (DU)
5) .754 Singletary (UVA)
6) .750 Causey (GT)
B RATINGS
7) .717 Hansbrough (UNC)
8) .705 Hayes (MD)
9) .676 Morrow (GT)
10) .674 Hammonds (CU)
11) .667 Allen (VT)
12) .656 Peacock (GT)
13) .655 Rice (BC)
14) .643 Douglas (FSU)
15) .639 Gist (MD)
16) .638 Scheyer (DU)
17) .635 Fells (NCSU)
18) .632 Collins (UM)
19) .627 Vasquez (MD)
20) .617 Johnson (WF)
21) .615 Hickson (NCSU)
22) .613 Mays (CU)
23) .612 Thompson (UNC)
24) .610 Henderson (DU)
25) .606 Joseph (UVA)
26) .600 Thompson (VT)
27) .598 Oates (BC)
28) .591 Vassallo (VT)
29) .588 Singler (DU)
30) .577 Mims (FSU)
31) .568 Grant (NCSU)
32) .564 Osby (MD)
33) .543 Oglesby (CU)
34) .529 Booker (CU)
35) .521 Smith (GT)
36) .517 Teague (WF)
37) .511 Smith (WF)
38) .509 Dews (UM)
C RATINGS
39) .496 Echefu (FSU)
40) .486 McClinton (UM)
41) .479 Ellington (UNC)
42) .464 Green (UNC)
43) .458 Tucker (MD)
44) .457 Skeen (WF)
45) .455 Washington (VT)
46) .454 Delaney (VT)
47) .440 King (UM)
48) .436 Gonzalez (NCSU)
49) .417 Baker (UVA)
49) .417 Rich (FSU)
51) .410 McFarland (WF)
52) .407 Stitt (CU)
53) .399 Diane (UVA)
54) .394 Hurdle (UM)
55) .384 Spears (BC)
56) .380 Milbourne (MD)
57) .377 Blair (BC)
58) .372 Thorns (VT)
59) .362 Sanders (BC)
60) .356 Reid (FSU)
61) .345 Swann (FSU)
62) .334 Ginyard (UNC)
63) .327 Asbury (UM)
64) .302 Hale (WF)
65) .296 McCauley (NCSU)
66) .275 Bell (GT)
67) .273 Clinch (GT)
68) .270 Thomas (DU)
69) .266 Paris (BC)
70) .254 Scott (UVA)
D RATINGS
71) .230 Costner (NCSU)
72) .002 Pettinella (UVA)
F RATINGS
none
TEAM SEASON RATINGS (Includes all players' ACC stats; NOT PACE-ADJUSTED)
.664 Duke
.658 North Carolina
.630 Maryland
.607 Clemson
.562 Georgia Tech
.554 Boston College
.493 Wake Forest
.461 N.C. State
.455 Miami
.432 Florida State
.417 Virginia Tech
.406 Virginia
OPPONENT SEASON RATINGS
.409 Duke
.444 Virginia Tech
.463 Clemson
.506 Georgia Tech
.507 Florida State
.551 Miami
.561 N.C. State
.567 North Carolina
.567 Virginia
.568 Maryland
.589 Wake Forest
.604 Boston College
TEAM vs OPPONENT QUOTIENT
1.623 Duke
1.313 Clemson
1.160 North Carolina
1.111 Georgia Tech
1.109 Maryland
.939 Virginia Tech
.917 Boston College
.852 Florida State
.837 Wake Forest
.826 Miami
.822 N.C. State
.715 Virginia
EXPLANATION:
Using player stats, I came up with a way to rate player productivity based on stats per minute played.
Based on the official box score, players get positive rating points for the obvious things; rebounds, points scored, blocks, assist, and steals. They lose rating points for fouls and turnovers. Shooting percentages also effect the ratings, factored by how many shots are attempted. Basically, shooting exactly 50% 2pt-FGs, 33% 3pt-FGs, or 75% FTs equals 0 rating points. Anything above those percentages will increase rating points and anything below those percentages will reduce rating points. Finally, the total rating points are divided by the minutes played.
I also assign grades based on the ratings.
A+ is 1.000+ (Star Player!)
A is .750 to .999
B is .500 to .749
C is .250 to .499
D is .000 to .249
F is for a negative rating (doing more bad than good)
Last edited by -jk; 02-12-2008 at 10:40 AM.
Reason: added permission note
Just be you. You is enough. - K, 4/5/10, 0:13.8 to play, 60-59 Duke.
You're all jealous hypocrites. - Titus on Laettner
You see those guys? Animals. They're animals. - SIU Coach Chris Lowery, on Duke