I read the article yesterday. It wasn't that negative, actually, largely saying that JJ should be able to contribute and that the writer doesn't understand why he doesn't play. The writer does state that he doesn't see practice, of course. What he says about JJ now is that he's turned into more of a spot-up shooter rather than a scorer, and he wonders whether the limited playing time is one of the reasons for this. He knocks his D, slightly, but talks up his range and quick shot. He thinks that JJ is likely to be a 13-16 ppg scorer in a few years, assuming he gets onto a team which utilizes him. I may be wrong in some of this, but I think that is what it said.