Interestingly enough, and I may be wrong, but I thought Georgetown looked like the team with better long-term prospects even though Memphis beat them comfortably. The Hoyas moved the ball better and seemed to be able to get scoring from all over while Memphis relied a lot on iso from CDR and Rose to get their points (although not as much as when they played UConn earlier in the season). Long-term, Georgetown's way will be more successful, imo. The Hoyas obviously have to rebound better and Hibbert has to play much better but I have no reason to believe either of those aspects were any more than anomalies in this game.