Originally Posted by
sandinmyshoes
While I'm sure that Roy Williams thought it should have been a charging foul, he did not actually say that. I think he was getting in a dig at the way the game was called, and he probably had a good point. It appeared to be a very physical contest. While I, and most on this board, are biased and thought it should have been a blocking foul, Williams has a legitimate point in that something should have been called. The contact was real and hard, it should have been a foul on somebody.
Also, even if Hansbrough was guilty of the foul, it was the contact that caused his injury, and Williams' point about how can there be that much contact without a foul remains a good one.
There was a lot of contact on both ends of the floor. I do not like the refs calling ticky-tack fouls and making the game a farce, but if they let things edge toward brutal then players end up getting hurt or losing their tempers with fights resulting.