Duke FB v. Georgia Tech

[devildeac]

There were 3 highlights:

1. Riley's 1 long TD catch. And that was marred by a BS unsportsmanlike conduct penalty as he raised his arms in celebration as he 'waltzed' into the end zone. That 15 yarder assessed on the following kick-off helped ruin our field position for the rest of the half. The rest of the above posters are correct however, we were basically inept with the ball for the remainder of the game.

2. NCSU over unc.

3. What the senior band members had on the top of their hats they displayed to the crowd as the alma mater was played. I told OZZIE I would not post this so he can tell you when he arrives home in about 30 minutes. There's your intro OZ!

[Duke84Blue]

To say we struggle offensively is an understatement. Going into today's game, we were ranked 116th in total offense and today's 150 yards means we're not moving up. We were dead last in rushing and that will certainly not improve on our 28 yards of rushing against Tech. In our last 3 hours of football (3 games worth) we have rushed 78 times for 65 yards, obviously not even a single yard a carry. There are 11 players in the ACC with rushing yardage more than the entire Duke team.

Even more troubling is this is not something new. Our offensive output per game over the last several years (including 11 games this season) is 279 yards, 283 yards, 248 yards and 265. In a relative sense, we were an offensive juggernaut in 2001-2003 when we averaged 350 yards a game over that three year span. Prior to 2004, Duke had not had a season where we averaged less than 280 yards a game since 1979.

[chrishoke]

Offense GT 476 DU 150

[jimsumner]

The penalty on Riley was not BS. Given the way officials have called taunting on scoring plays over the last few years, there was absolutely no excuse for ER doing anything that would draw a flag. None.

Duke did a great job of getting some Beamer-ball points. A blocked punt that set up a TD, a fumble recovery for a score, an INT that set up a field goal. Leon Wright's inexplicable decision to try to field a wobbly punt heading out of bounds deep in Duke territory gave one back.

Maggio is perfect this season on place-kicks.

Duke was incapable of handling Tech's blitz. Roof was asked about this after the game but either could not shed any light or (more likely) would not criticize anyone by name. Whether it's an inabilty to change plays, an inability to block, an inability of the receivers to get off the LOS, Tech just toyed with Duke in blitzing situations.

Duke doesn't block especially well.

Way, way too many dropped passes. Riley dropped three, including a probable TD, and Kelly dropped three.

Tech was very effective on direct snaps to Choice. Roof and Chris Davis both acknowledged after the game that Duke had practiced against this formation but missed some big tackles.

The ability of Tech's punting team to pin Duke back deep was huge. The wind was a real factor but that works both ways. Tech consistenly kicked off out of the end zone, while Duke was pooch-kicking or kicking out of bounds. Tech had a clear edge in punting and kicking off and consequently a clear edge in field position.

Roof thanked the loyal fans after the game and promised better days ahead.

[OZZIE4DUKE]

What DevilDeac and JimSumner said. Our offense was pitiful. One long TD pass was our entire offense - the rest of the points were set up, or scored by, the defense getting turnovers. Neither Riley nor Kelly could catch the ball for most of the afternoon. Butter-fingers? Hearing footsteps? Just plain lack of concentration? I have no idea but it needs to stop now.

The offensive line is just that. They must learn how to block. Can somebody please teach them? PLEASE!

As for the senior DUMB members! My biggest kudos to you guys! Putting the letters that follow, one on each band hat, and holding them up as you were introduced was genius! "G T H u n c G T H !" We all loved it! If you had had 2 more seniors, you could have put 9 F on the other two hats

[mapei]

I get the criticisms of the offense. But a defense that gives up almost 500 yards and 41 points isn't too great, either.

We just need to give this program time to mature.

[Olympic Fan]

I've got to speak up for the defense ... I know the raw numbers don't look good, but I thought it was actually a pretty good performance.

You had to be there to see how the combination of inept offense and lousy kicking game kept giving GT the ball near midfield or deeper in Duke territory. The defense was on the field all the time and usually with their backs to the wall. There were a couple of breakdowns, but on the whole the defense did a good job.

I think the game was symbolized by two pass plays at the beginning of the game. On GT's second play, Bennett completed a pass inside the Duke 5, but Chris Davis hit the receiver and knocked the ball loose for a fumble. The ball rolled in the end zone and Leon Wright was right there to fall on it for a touchdown. Somehow, he strumbled off-balance as he tried to get it and the only Tech player within 20 yards beat three Duke players to the ball for a touchdown.

On Duke's first play from scrimmage, Lewis tried to go deep to Riley, who broke free behind the corner. He was wide open for a 67-yard touchdown. The ball was right on his fingertips, but he dropped it -- the first of his three drops.

I agree with Jim -- the dropped passes were devastating. Kelly's three drops came in a very short period and just stymied the offense.

[DUAA_shirt]

I've been attending Duke Football games off and on at Wallace Wade Stadium going back to the Mike McGee years in the 1970s. For the past 17-18 years it has been bad I know, but is this as low as it can go? The fan support has eroded to the point where the attendance today was only listed at 18,788. Come on, there were hardly 10,000 butts sitting on the bleachers if that. This had to be the smallest Duke crowd I've ever seen at Wallace Wade.

Are the students boycotting games? I never been to a game (or any college game for that matter) where there wasn't a section of students (except the band) supporting their team. Most of the sparse fans sitting around in my area today were the middle-aged die hard fans and young children. At one point, the cheerleaders were cheering to empty sections of seats.

Finally, the concessions are just plain awful. With hardly any lines at the concession stand, I had to get the attention of a huddle of teenagers working the counter just to get any service. Why are these people working concessions when obviously they don't want to be there in the first place?

As a fan, I am proud to support Duke Football and our guys today on the field. Certainly, no Division I-A team can win under these conditions. This cannot be all of Ted Roof's fault directly. If we cannot attract any fan support or continue to have lackluster facilities (ie: bathrooms). The status quo will continue to go on indefinitely. Brodhead and Alleva, why aren't you listening?

[Lavabe]

The fan support has eroded to the point where the attendance today was only listed at 18,788. Come on, there were hardly 10,000 butts sitting on the bleachers if that. This had to be the smallest Duke crowd I've ever seen at Wallace Wade.

Are the students boycotting games?

As a fan, I am proud to support Duke Football and our guys today on the field.

Point 1: Smaller than attendance at Fulton County Stadium the season before Sid slid? Smaller than attendance at Shea Stadium in the seasons prior to 1969?

Oh right ... that's baseball. NOTE: Insert obligate George Carlin comparison between baseball and football.

Point 2: I expect that students are balancing their limited nonacademic time. At this point in the season, BBall (Men & Women) wins... and there's a lot of hope at the beginning of those seasons. The effects are probably brought out further in a small school. Add in the fact that FB is at its season's end (as opposed to the beginning, when there's always hope), and you got the makings of poor attendance.

Point 3: I am glad you support the guys on the field. I imagine the guys on the football team are incredibly thankful for the consistent support from folks like you, Ozzie, Devildeac, and others. That gets more to the point of college athletics. That and the senior DUMBers spelling out GTHuncGTH!

But a win at home would be REALLY nice. Better luck next year.

Cheers,
Lavabe

[devildeac]

I've got to speak up for the defense ... I know the raw numbers don't look good, but I thought it was actually a pretty good performance.

You had to be there to see how the combination of inept offense and lousy kicking game kept giving GT the ball near midfield or deeper in Duke territory. The defense was on the field all the time and usually with their backs to the wall. There were a couple of breakdowns, but on the whole the defense did a good job.

I think the game was symbolized by two pass plays at the beginning of the game. On GT's second play, Bennett completed a pass inside the Duke 5, but Chris Davis hit the receiver and knocked the ball loose for a fumble. The ball rolled in the end zone and Leon Wright was right there to fall on it for a touchdown. Somehow, he strumbled off-balance as he tried to get it and the only Tech player within 20 yards beat three Duke players to the ball for a touchdown.

On Duke's first play from scrimmage, Lewis tried to go deep to Riley, who broke free behind the corner. He was wide open for a 67-yard touchdown. The ball was right on his fingertips, but he dropped it -- the first of his three drops.

I agree with Jim -- the dropped passes were devastating. Kelly's three drops came in a very short period and just stymied the offense.

I will reinforce what OF said AND add the facts that the D had a pick deep in GT territory that lead to a FG(no typo here, we made a 40 yarder with distance and height to spare). The D also returned a fumble about 20-30 yards for a TD. Yea, they gave up a LOT of yards and quite a few big plays via the run and the pass but did 'keep' GT to 'only' 7/17 in 3rd down conversions. Without a fair defensive effort, the score is probably more on the order of 48-17 or 55-14.

[6th Man]

I fail to see how Alleva keeps his job. Duke is the laughing stock of college football. The basketball team runs itself with Coach K at the helm. I think the measure of an AD at Duke would be to improve the football. As long as Coach K is in place a 2 year old could maintain basketball success as an AD. It can't be any worse than it is right now for football. Where is any creativity to get attendance up? To improve facilities? To open up the deep pockets and offer some real money to draw a talented coach? Look at what Coach Grobe has done with Wake Forest. I guarantee you if he had come to Duke, we would be as successful as Wake. In fact, Duke has more of a national name than Wake and I would not be surprised if he could have landed even better recruits than he has gotten at Wake.

To me it is unacceptable that football continues to go at it's current state. I see no effort by the University and that is so incredibly disappointing. If I had the same performance at my job that Alleva has done with football, I would have been sent packing a long time ago.

[mapei]

a pick deep in GT territory that lead to a FG(no typo here, we made a 40 yarder with distance and height to spare).

Are you sure about that?

[devildeac]

Are you sure about that?

Abso(field goal)lutely. In fact, the 2nd in 2 weeks. I forgot about the 'meaningless' one vs klempsun last week but then OZZIE reminded me it was not meaningless-it allowed us to practice for the one we made yesterday

[mapei]

Abso(field goal)lutely. In fact, the 2nd in 2 weeks. I forgot about the 'meaningless' one vs klempsun last week but then OZZIE reminded me it was not meaningless-it allowed us to practice for the one we made yesterday

But my point was that you misspelled "led" in a sentence that claimed to have no typo.

[devildeac]

But my point was that you misspelled "led" in a sentence that claimed to have no typo.

TWEEET! devildeac whistled for his second infraction in a week. Darn, and I try to proof my posts a couple times before submitting.