Originally Posted by
johnb
Meaning no disrespect to one of our number who works for the organization, it strikes me as odd the women's golf team won a big tournament named after "Hooters." Seems to me that there is enough objectification of young women in the world that our 18-22 year old female athletes shouldn't be mandated to support a business that is organized around women's breasts.
From the company's website: "many consider 'Hooters' a slang term for a portion of the female anatomy," but it adds, "Hooters Girls have the same right to use their natural female sex appeal to earn a living as do supermodels Cindy Crawford and Naomi Campbell."
That may well be true, but does anyone find it unsavory that the NCAA sets up their athletes in such a way?
I'm glad someone said this. I just thought it was an ironic moment in the history of Title IX.
A movie is not about what it's about; it's about how it's about it.
---Roger Ebert
Some questions cannot be answered
Who’s gonna bury who
We need a love like Johnny, Johnny and June
---Over the Rhine