Are an improved kicking game and an experienced qb that should be much better at protecting the football.
If you look back at the WF, NW, and UVA games, some very costly DJ turnovers (WF and UVA, oof) and missed fg's were just blatantly the reason we lost. I was at all three games, and the silver lining was that you knew DJ was young and would get much better, and you knew that Cut would go recruit a PK and at least have solid competition for the spot headed into the fall of 2017. There was even a costly missed fg vs GT, a blocked fg returned for a td vs VT and a bad miss on what could've been a huge fg vs Louisville, but with those games it didnt seem to be almost squarely the reason we lost.
As a fan, I always play the shoulda-woulda game, and in Cut's tenure I tend to give us the benefit of the doubt in close games (rightfully so) but last year we had those two factors early in the year that were detrimental to so many critical drives in some close games, and those are two things I dont think I have to be optimistic about, because I fully expect them to improve (little more bullish on DJ's maturity and ball security than the kicking game, but Cut sent a message loud and clear in the offseason.)