Considering the semester ended like 3 weeks after the national championship game, I'd find it hard to believe that he didn't finish it out -- I didn't hear anything about that and feel like that would have been news. People give Cal flack for his one and done factory, but I believe there's been only one player in the Cal era at UK that withdrew from school -- Daniel Orton. And Orton hasn't been invited back.
"Going to school" is the deal. He signed up to enroll at LSU and play for the Bengal Tigers. He didn't "go to school" and follow through on his part of the bargain, leaving LSU with a black mark on its "academic progress stat." And, albeit by rumor and innuendo (the coin of the realm on the internet), he was not a positive presence in the locker room.
If that was his intention, he should have played professionally someplace and skipped college.
Kindly,
Sage Grouse
'Maybe it's not an unusual problem with college ath-a-letes from overseas. The Golf Channel guys joke about foreign players coming to American universities on golf scholarships asking, "You mean I have to study, too?"'
'There is no evidence that the Duke women's golf team, all from overseas, have any of these problems'
Sage Grouse
---------------------------------------
'When I got on the bus for my first road game at Duke, I saw that every player was carrying textbooks or laptops. I coached in the SEC for 25 years, and I had never seen that before, not even once.' - David Cutcliffe to Duke alumni in Washington, DC, June 2013
I haven't raised this issue before, but I wonder what kind of deal Simmons made with LSU. He played in games, but he played Simmons ball, not team ball. Why did he bring the ball up the court? Did LSU need a 6'10" point guard? Where was the coaching? Where was the coach? Can you imagine a Duke player getting away with playing his own game, to the exclusion of the team?
In normal circumstances, discipline can be imposed by a ride on the pine. I didn't see that going on with Simmons. I guess that he cut a deal before signing with LSU that spelled out how little he had to do, and how much he would play. I also guess that that approach is against NCAA rules.
fwiw (admittedly not much) DraftExpress now has Grayson as the last pick in the first round and NBADraft.net has him down at 25.
My Quick Smells Like French Toast.
(1) It is my understanding that every one-and-done freshman at Duke has finished his second semester in good academic standings. In fact, every early entry NBA guy from Duke, except one, left in good academic standings. The only exception was sophomore William Avery, who did stop going to class and essentially drop out of school midway through his final semester.
(2) Roy to the NBA? Maybe a decade ago ...but with his age and recent health issues, I'd be VERY surprised if any NBA team was seriously interested in Ol' Roy these days.
(3) Cat Barber actually told Luke DeCock of the Raleigh newspaper that he was going to test the NBA waters on the Monday before the ACC Tournament. I had a long discussion about that with an NC State insider in Washington and he told me that Barber would go if he could be guaranteed a first round pick -- but would return if he remained a second-round projection. I mentioned that to an NBA scout who told me that the State people were fooling themselves and that Barber was gone. We'll see.
Oh, it's for evaluation purposes. Back in the days of high schoolers going straight to the NBA, there were too many misevaluations on guys like Kwame Brown and Jonathan Bender. Owners were tired of making huge investments in unknown prospects, and the addition of one year of being able to evaluate them at an intermediate level between HS and NBA has been invaluable to scouting departments. Take this season, for example. If there were no 1-and-done rule, it's possible Labissiere would've been the overall #1 draft pick, Cheick Diallo a top-5 pick, Malik Newman a mid-1st round pick, etc.
http://www.si.com/college-basketball...2016-nba-draft
I haven't seen him on any boards, but I guess if you think you have a shot it doesn't hurt to test the waters. Although I don't really see him jumping into the first round. Would it even be worth it to leave school early to be a mid to late second rounder?
Agree with this. The age rule is for the benefit of the NBA owners and GMs - not just because of misevaluations but because no one wanted to be the guy who passed on the "next Kobe Bryant" or "next Kevin Garnett" so they were drafting on potential alone, even if the player wasn't ready to be a contributor at that time, with lots of misses as a result. As the player develops further (in college or abroad), they don't have to pay him and when they finally do pay him, the quality of play is more high caliber, increasing watchability ... Side benefit to the NBA franchises - player playing in college builds up a broader rep/fan base, which increases interest and merchandise sales.
BTW, the above all argues in favor of raising the age limit another year which provides all the same benefits but more. The players union (as far as I know) has thus far been resistant insofar as the very ocassional exceptional talent (LeBron James) is hurt by this rule...
Yes, good word, he got "exposed" this year. I'm surprised he will even stay at the #2 pick. He has shown none of the heart of a guy that you want to build a team around. As for his game, it is so far from a finished product. In a good draft year, he might not go in the top 6