Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 26
  1. #1

    Calhoun - Can he possibly be removed

    from the Hall of Fame???

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Toledo
    He shouldn't be there to begin with. He should be in prison. He practically runs his own cartel up in Storrs.

    However, with that said, I'm not really sure what the point of this thread is... What, did one of his players rob a pharmacy at gun point (and then be named captain the following afternoon at "Husky Day")?
    Last edited by Cameron; 10-03-2007 at 09:57 PM.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Portland, OR
    Quote Originally Posted by Cameron View Post
    I'm not really sure what the point of this thread is...
    I believe the OP was referencing the current top story in the DBR headlines column.

  4. #4
    Did anyone else find it funny that Holy Cross, after Calhoun's power play, refused a trip to Oklahoma based on "academic considerations" but replaced the Coaches v Cancer date on its schedule with a trip to San Francisco?

  5. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by Biscuit King View Post
    Did anyone else find it funny that Holy Cross, after Calhoun's power play, refused a trip to Oklahoma based on "academic considerations" but replaced the Coaches v Cancer date on its schedule with a trip to San Francisco?
    The trip to Oklahoma would have been during the Coaches vs. Cancer regional rounds, November 5-9 (and right in the middle of the academic term). The game against the University of San Francisco is January 3rd... during Christmas break.

  6. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by Biscuit King View Post
    Did anyone else find it funny that Holy Cross, after Calhoun's power play, refused a trip to Oklahoma based on "academic considerations" but replaced the Coaches v Cancer date on its schedule with a trip to San Francisco?
    No. Holy Cross is taking academics seriously (as they always have). They don't do long distance travel when classes are in session, but save those trips for during semester breaks. It seems you chosen to assume the worst about HC instead of assuming the best. They are a classy program - UConn is not.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Raleigh, NC
    Quote Originally Posted by juise View Post
    I believe the OP was referencing the current top story in the DBR headlines column.
    I have this forum in my links and almost never go directly to the front DBR page. There are lots of posts made that assume the front page has been read. I'm not saying that's wrong, just making an observation. If I start reading a thread and it seems like everyone knows something I don't, I'll go check the DBR.com.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Western North Carolina

    Holy Cross a little disengenuous

    Granted Calhoun is a complete D-Bag. But, his decision makes sense. HC only agreed to compete in the tourney when the ORGANIZERS promised a game at Storrs. Calhoun wasn't a party to this agreement.

    I am sure that he wants no part of HC in Storrs. There is nothing for UCONN to gain, and everything to lose. For HC, it is the opposite. There is nothing to lose and every thing to gain.

    UCONN should annhialate HC. But, the Huskies will be looking ahead, while HC will be playing as though it were their FF. HC wants to play a big game in a local area to maximize its recruiting profile. If they win, great, but if they keep it respectable, they come out as winners.

    UCONN only gets a neutral outcome if they absolutely destroy HC (but they look like bullies who ran up the score on an overmatched squad). Plus, a loss to a low level local team would be horrible. Imagine Duke losing to NCCU, Davidson, Willimington at CIS. Sure, the teams are respectable, but Duke should handily win. It is only news when they lose.

    Calhoun, who I hate, only sought to avoid a trap game against a local competitor. He never agreed to the HC game. That was the organizers deal, not Calhoun's.

    You have to know, and I mean that anyone with 2 separate brain cells to rub together, HAS to know that Big Time Teams use their clout to big-time tournaments and lesser squads all the time. Now, we do not know that Duke does it, same with UNC, but it probably has happened at some point. Usually the lesser squad keeps its yap shut when it happens, for good reason.

    Look, I feel for the HC boys and their academic concerns. But, a lot of teams would kill for a slot in a tourney like this, no matter where they had to travel to, especially a low level squad like HC. There are a ton of mid and low majors that want these slots, and they have to do whatever, wherever, when said slot opens up. Which it won't for HC after this for many years.

    How many mid-majors and low-majors get to play near their home turf in tourneys like this? None. I hope HC enjoys this brief moment in the spotlight, because it will be 5-10 years before they are ever invited to a big time tourney, if they keep their current coach on. Getting into the NCAAs as a mid major just got that much harder at HC.

    Patrick Yates
    Last edited by -jk; 10-04-2007 at 02:26 PM. Reason: Changed NCSU to NCCU. Unless Patrick was on drugs.

  9. #9
    My bad. The article didn't specify the date of the CvC event, it just said:

    "...[Organizers] called back the other day to say they thought they could work it out for the Crusaders to play at Storrs. Too late. The Crusaders had already scheduled a Jan. 3 game at the University of San Francisco and plans to honor its obligation."

    I didn't assume anything about the "classiness" of the HC program, I just assumed that the USF game on Jan. 3 was the conflict, as the above excerpt would seem to imply. I guess the conflict is the number of games on the schedule, not overlapping dates. My mistake. That's what I get for relying on a guy who looks to have a worse toupee than Frank Dascenzo.

  10. #10
    Quote Originally Posted by Patrick Yates View Post
    I am sure that he wants no part of HC in Storrs. There is nothing for UCONN to gain, and everything to lose. For HC, it is the opposite. There is nothing to lose and every thing to gain.
    You're wrong. Why does Duke have such a good RPI every year compared to other ACC teams? It's because we play teams like Holy Cross, George Mason, Davidson, Bucknell, New Mexico State etc very regularly. There's plenty to gain - namely better seeding in the NCAAs.

    Also, this wasn't mentioned anywhere, but Calhoun basically whined about playing Holy Cross because of their slow down style of play. Anyone remember him crying about Quinnipiac last year? Same thing.

  11. #11
    Quote Originally Posted by Patrick Yates View Post
    Granted Calhoun is a complete D-Bag. But, his decision makes sense. HC only agreed to compete in the tourney when the ORGANIZERS promised a game at Storrs. Calhoun wasn't a party to this agreement.

    I am sure that he wants no part of HC in Storrs. There is nothing for UCONN to gain, and everything to lose. For HC, it is the opposite. There is nothing to lose and every thing to gain.

    UCONN should annhialate HC. But, the Huskies will be looking ahead, while HC will be playing as though it were their FF. HC wants to play a big game in a local area to maximize its recruiting profile. If they win, great, but if they keep it respectable, they come out as winners.

    UCONN only gets a neutral outcome if they absolutely destroy HC (but they look like bullies who ran up the score on an overmatched squad). Plus, a loss to a low level local team would be horrible. Imagine Duke losing to NCCU, Davidson, Willimington at CIS. Sure, the teams are respectable, but Duke should handily win. It is only news when they lose.

    Calhoun, who I hate, only sought to avoid a trap game against a local competitor. He never agreed to the HC game. That was the organizers deal, not Calhoun's.

    You have to know, and I mean that anyone with 2 separate brain cells to rub together, HAS to know that Big Time Teams use their clout to big-time tournaments and lesser squads all the time. Now, we do not know that Duke does it, same with UNC, but it probably has happened at some point. Usually the lesser squad keeps its yap shut when it happens, for good reason.

    Look, I feel for the HC boys and their academic concerns. But, a lot of teams would kill for a slot in a tourney like this, no matter where they had to travel to, especially a low level squad like HC. There are a ton of mid and low majors that want these slots, and they have to do whatever, wherever, when said slot opens up. Which it won't for HC after this for many years.

    How many mid-majors and low-majors get to play near their home turf in tourneys like this? None. I hope HC enjoys this brief moment in the spotlight, because it will be 5-10 years before they are ever invited to a big time tourney, if they keep their current coach on. Getting into the NCAAs as a mid major just got that much harder at HC.

    Patrick Yates
    I buy at most a paragraph of what you said, Patrick. Maybe the sentence about Calhoun I hate but that's about it. The rest is just wrong. UCONN being the premiwer team needs to accept being the host site regardless of who might be the rummies selected to play there.

    Also agree with whichever poster implied the coaches vs Cancer organizers need to grow a pair, and not bow down to the mighty Calhoun.

    http://www.nydailynews.com/blogs/wei...t_bend_to.html
    Last edited by ACCBBallFan; 10-04-2007 at 04:00 PM.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Los Angeles
    I also have little respect for Calhoun. Anyone remember what happened to the team last year? They played the weakest available competition at home for their first 11 games, winning those (according to Pomeroy, one was ranked 60th by the rest were really bad, mainly 200 or 300+). They then went 6-13 the rest of the way as they didn't get to set as much of a creampuff schedule. I think that Calhoun is trying to ensure that he has a creampuff schedule again and is scared to play HC, when in reality if you want to be a legitimate team you should relish decent competition. As mentioned above, Duke has a great RPI every year because they play very few weak teams in the OOC schedule.

  13. #13

    Might not be a good guy, but

    He sure coached the pants off K in 1999 title game. Our team that year, along with UNLV 1991 were two of the most dominant teams ever that didn't win a title. We had 4 top 15 NBA players and didn't have a bad day. Got to respect the man for that.

  14. #14
    Quote Originally Posted by trinity92 View Post
    He sure coached the pants off K in 1999 title game. Our team that year, along with UNLV 1991 were two of the most dominant teams ever that didn't win a title. We had 4 top 15 NBA players and didn't have a bad day. Got to respect the man for that.
    That's not how I remember it - I remember one player playing well that game (Trajan, but for his miscue at the end) - the others on that team didn't play well. Some of it is coaching/game plan. Some of it is players not playing up to par. Some of it is that the Ct players just outplayed us.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Quote Originally Posted by trinity92 View Post
    He sure coached the pants off K in 1999 title game. Our team that year, along with UNLV 1991 were two of the most dominant teams ever that didn't win a title. We had 4 top 15 NBA players and didn't have a bad day. Got to respect the man for that.
    There were two future elite NBA players on the floor that night, and the better one wasn't wearing a Duke uniform.

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Hot'Lanta... home of the Falcons!
    Quote Originally Posted by Duvall View Post
    There were two future elite NBA players on the floor that night, and the better one wasn't wearing a Duke uniform.
    Are you saying that Elton Brand is not a better player than Rip Hamilton? I beg to differ. Rip is good, very good, but Elton is a notch better in my book.

    --Jason "not that NBA success has anything at all to do with what kind of college player you are" Evans

  17. #17
    Quote Originally Posted by trinity92 View Post
    He sure coached the pants off K in 1999 title game. Our team that year, along with UNLV 1991 were two of the most dominant teams ever that didn't win a title. We had 4 top 15 NBA players and didn't have a bad day. Got to respect the man for that.
    Calhoun's team also equally underperformed a couple years ago with Rudy Gay and co.

  18. #18
    I think the job their team did stopping Brand won UCONN the game, and UCONN's best inside player was Jake Voskuhl, so they certainly didn't do it through talent. It was Calhoun's scheme for neutralizing Brand that won the game, and K just didn't have an answer.

    Although Brand is more important to his team than Rip, Rip has an NCAA and NBA championship ring and Elton doesn't have any.

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Hot'Lanta... home of the Falcons!
    Quote Originally Posted by trinity92 View Post
    Although Brand is more important to his team than Rip, Rip has an NCAA and NBA championship ring and Elton doesn't have any.
    You are aware that Greg Koubek has multiple NCAA championship rings and Danny Ferry doesn't have any, right?

    --Jason "just being snarky-- forgive me " Evans

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Washington, DC
    Quote Originally Posted by trinity92 View Post
    UCONN's best inside player was Jake Voskuhl, so they certainly didn't do it through talent.
    Um, Emeka Okafor? Yeah, he sat for most of the first half, which is a big part of the reason Duke was able to build a lead. But he played his heart out in the second half.

    I think Elton and Hamilton have had roughly equal pro careers so far.

Similar Threads

  1. Jim Calhoun reveals he has skin cancer
    By unexpected in forum Elizabeth King Forum
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 05-31-2008, 01:38 PM
  2. More Duke Comments on Florida Possibly Repeating
    By BCGroup in forum Elizabeth King Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 03-31-2007, 04:17 PM
  3. VCU Using Illegal, Possibly Android Players?
    By thebur in forum Elizabeth King Forum
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 03-15-2007, 01:03 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •