"Welcome to the David Cutcliffe End Zone at Brooks Field at Wallace Wade Stadium"
Brooks field.
That's what 13 million dollars buys. Not a fan.
http://www.goduke.com/ViewArticle.db...CLID=210221597
The commitment of the money is awesome and appreciated, but I'd rather the field be named after someone who has contributed to the program on the field itself. (Say...oh, I dunno...someone like that Cutcliffe guy.)
Q "Why do you like Duke, you didn't even go there." A "Because my art school didn't have a basketball team."
"Welcome to the David Cutcliffe End Zone at Brooks Field at Wallace Wade Stadium"
The good news is, in 50 years it will be "historic Brooks field."
I would prefer that a building be named after a donor than our football field, but then again I did not give millions to the University to build it.
Still, Brooks-Cutcliffe field would work.
Edit to add: We should all be thankful that the Brooks family helped to bring about these renovations; I would not want the Brooks family to think that we are slighting them by our reaction to the name.
Last edited by OldPhiKap; 07-17-2015 at 11:12 AM.
I 110% agree with you. Coach Cut field has a nice ring to it and he would be worthy of such an honor given his contributions to the program that will forever live in the record books. Like other posters on here, I would rather see a significant donor, have a building of some nature named after them. Good for the Brooks family that they had a liquid $13 million laying around that they could donate however, that's impressive.
I would have expected naming the field to cost a lot more. $13M seems cheap for that. Maybe it's in light of their many contributions over the long term.
Duke's endowment is a solid $7.0B (when I was a freshman in 2007, it was around $2.3B IIRC. Broadhead can raise funds). However, that is only good for 15th in the country. Any funds that can go into academics and the students is a huge plus. So, if someone wants to spend $13M for naming rights to a school, I say, "Awesome. That will mean more money for the school and, through a trickle down effect, academics".
Criticism may not be agreeable, but it is necessary. It fulfils the same function as pain in the human body. It calls attention to an unhealthy state of things. - Winston Churchill
President of the "Nolan Smith Should Have His Jersey in The Rafters" Club
Well, and this would never happen with these fine people, but I worry about naming stadiums and things for $$$$. Coach K earned his namesake. So did Dean. With only money as the measure for naming something, what seems a good idea one decade could be a disaster in another. I mean, imagine Bill Cosby Field?
Sage Grouse
---------------------------------------
'When I got on the bus for my first road game at Duke, I saw that every player was carrying textbooks or laptops. I coached in the SEC for 25 years, and I had never seen that before, not even once.' - David Cutcliffe to Duke alumni in Washington, DC, June 2013
The most recent brochure for the Iron Dukes provides information about naming rights for a variety of athletic facilities or parts of facilities. The chart in the brochure indicates that for the football field the gift required is $20 million. The Brooks family has already given funds which provided the practice facility. Other donors have already agreed to donate for naming rights the North Gate and the East Gate. The naming rights for the remaining West Gate is $4 million. The press level lobby of Blue Devil Tower is available for $1 million. Many naming possibilities remain at the Yoh.
All areas available for naming in Cameron are reserved.
Remind me the academic disciplines and administrative initiatives attributed to Messrs Duke, Cornell, Harvard, Yale, Stanford, etc.
I work at a place where David Koch is being celebrated for his donation of a $100m medical building, and he's David Koch. The Brooks family is fine. Reminds me of a Chronicle editorial after the Woodruffs (Coke) gave 100m to Emory; the editorial indicated that for an equivalent amount, we at Duke would become the Pepsi generation. No dice.
Looking forward to seeing the stadium!
I would rather it be Brooks Field than being named after a corporate donor. So there's that silver lining.
Trinity College had a nice ring to it and JB basically bought the naming rights. There is an established pattern of this kind of behavior.
I basically feel the same way. It's better then "Lil Dinos" Field.
I am trying to but I can't quite focus, ever since I drank that cappuccino...he's gonna get his soon enough.
For those mentioning that you prefer naming buildings after donors, from the ESPN online article (http://espn.go.com/college-football/...ion-donation):
"Steve Brooks is the president and CEO of the Phoenix American Insurance Group Inc. One of his sons, Matt, is a former Blue Devils football player. The family has two other campus facilities named for them: the Brooks Practice Facility and the Brooks Football Building."
I'm not a big fan of the field name, either. However, I am very appreciative of the support the Brooks family has had in upgrading the Duke football facilities. The upgraded facilities not only help the players and fans, but are a big part of recruiting better players. So to that, I do thank the Brooks family and appreciate the support.