First off, thanks to everyone who serves as a moderator. Your presence and actions make this a worthwhile forum.

That said, let me suggest that the phrase "everything in moderation" also includes the activity of moderators. Specifically, I am talking about moving threads. There was an interesting thread about Bill Simmons up yesterday. It had approx 20 posts the last time I checked. This morning I find it is lumped in with the 347 posts about Henderson's suspension. Any discussion about Simmons' article is basically muzzled by that action. I think that is wrong.

In contrast, there were two threads started about All-ACC this morning. One of them was moved after it had just one or two posts. That is a great example of how and when a thread should be moved.

I propose the criteria for moving a thread be as follows:
1) If a thread is started that is about the exact same topic as another AND
2) It is caught before it has reached "critical mass" (say 10 or less posts)

My two cents. Thanks