Originally Posted by
CDu
That gives UK the top PG, SG, PF, and C prospects in next year's class (unless you count Parker as a PF, then Randle is the #2 PF). They also have the #2 C and #3 SF and are in the running for the #1 SF.
I think any celebration of the demise of Calipari's one-and-done shop is a bit premature.
True.
On the other hand, this year's team was supposed to be a juggernaut, as well.
I suspect next year's version won't be nearly as bad as this year's, and yet not nearly as good as the team that won it all last year. Remember the 2010 Kentucky team? That team was loaded to the gills with great talent and was a very good team. However, they got beat by West Virginia in the tournament (and West Virginia was subsequently dismantled by some team....can't quite remember who, but it will come to me after a while).
So, although I agree that celebration of the "demise" of the system is premature, I don't necessarily think that next year's team will be proof that the system is awesome, either.
"We are not provided with wisdom, we must discover it for ourselves, after a journey through the wilderness which no one else can take for us, an effort which no one can spare us, for our wisdom is the point of view from which we come at last to regard the world." --M. Proust