Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 25
  1. #1

    "Duke Underrated" by Al Featherston

    Just wanted someplace to say that this was, as usual, a great piece. Thoughtful, detailed, and as always featuring a few great previously-unknown-to-me tidbits from Duke, ACC, and indeed basketball history. And to be honest, no need for the disclaimer, I don't think!

    Anyway, thanks for such great contributions to all things Duke, to both DBR and Al himself! Now just waiting on the Playcallers first piece!

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Nashville
    Featherston*. No idea how everyone gets this wrong so consistently.

    Agreed though, I was going to post something similar but wasn't sure if it was already being discussed. I always enjoy his articles, and this one was particularly good. Hard not to get pumped up for the season reading it!

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Raleigh, NC
    Quote Originally Posted by Greg_Newton View Post
    Featherston*. No idea how everyone gets this wrong so consistently. !
    I believe Al was an original member of The Flintstones cast.

  4. #4
    I think Cook will be really improved this year, but the piece about Coach K making due with only combo guards since Duhon is off. Here are some remarks from recruiting websites:

    "A consummate point guard, Paulus makes everyone around him better. He can get the ball anywhere on the court at will, either on the pass or the dribble."

    "One of the true floor generals in the class. Noted for his defense, Dockery has been on the high-major hitlist since his freshman year."

    These guys weren't considered combo guards. And if the comeback is going to be "well, fine, but they didn't pan out to be great point guards," then I'm going to have to call in Jumbo to count Scheyer in the opposite direction - didn't come in a point guard, but ended up a damn good one.

    I think Quinn's improvement is already factored into our ranking.

  5. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by Wander View Post
    These guys weren't considered combo guards. And if the comeback is going to be "well, fine, but they didn't pan out to be great point guards," then I'm going to have to call in Jumbo to count Scheyer in the opposite direction - didn't come in a point guard, but ended up a damn good one.
    I think I've seen this question before... but anyone know the goings-on with Jumbo? Haven't heard from him in awhile? I miss his stuff...

  6. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by Wander View Post
    I think Cook will be really improved this year, but the piece about Coach K making due with only combo guards since Duhon is off. Here are some remarks from recruiting websites:

    "A consummate point guard, Paulus makes everyone around him better. He can get the ball anywhere on the court at will, either on the pass or the dribble."

    "One of the true floor generals in the class. Noted for his defense, Dockery has been on the high-major hitlist since his freshman year."

    These guys weren't considered combo guards. And if the comeback is going to be "well, fine, but they didn't pan out to be great point guards," then I'm going to have to call in Jumbo to count Scheyer in the opposite direction - didn't come in a point guard, but ended up a damn good one.

    I think Quinn's improvement is already factored into our ranking.
    You can make the argument that we haven't had a traditional two-way "Duke" PG since Duhon. Scheyer didn't guard the opposing PG. Paulus was a below-average defender. Dockery couldn't really run the offense. Nolan Smith was a shoot-first guard. It remains to be seen whether Quinn can guard opposing PGs, but if he can, I agree with Mr. Featherston that he'll be our first "real" PG since 2004 (other than 8 games with Kyrie).

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Vermont
    Should we be concerned by the comment at the end of the article which says K and MP2 have "formed a special bomb?"
    Will Homeland Security become involved?

  8. #8
    Quote Originally Posted by budwom View Post
    Should we be concerned by the comment at the end of the article which says K and MP2 have "formed a special bomb?"
    Will Homeland Security become involved?
    Carrie was right, they are both working for Abu Nazir.
    "Something in my vicinity is Carolina blue and this offends me." - HPR

  9. #9
    As a perpetual optimist re Duke's chances to go deep in the NCAAT, I agree with Featherston's overall thesis, and very much appreciate the detailed analysis. Like a number of excellent posters on EK, he knows this team, uh, inside and out. He definitely tells us a lot more in his article than most any other analytical piece we're likely to see preseason on any national site. Details, details, details, good stuff.

    As to the question posed in his title - "Is Duke Underrated?" - it depends on where the preseason prognosticators rate Duke. Yes, it's "all guesswork right now," but some guesswork is more informed - "educated," not to put too fine a point on it - than others. It's not a good educated guess to put Duke at, say, 17. A better educated guess, given one's understanding of the 50 or 60 pretty good teams out there, might be 7-10. Which is probably where the consensus will place Duke, exemplified by the ESPN/USA Today coaches preseason poll, where Duke is #8.

    Featherston's most controversial statement is probably this: "I believe that Duke has – on paper — the best team in the ACC and is as strong a championship contender as there is nationally – not the favorite, but at least as good as Indiana, Louisville or any of the other candidates being offered a preseason No. 1 teams." He defends this presumably controversial statement by arguing that sometimes there's a more "realistic" case to be made for an optimistic scenario than for a pessimistic prognostication.

    His analysis in support of his assertion that Duke is a legit NC contender - as legit as IU or UL, the consensus 1-2 in either order - focuses on what he knows that others seem not to know so much: the details of Duke's team.

    I'd add that, while they're are fine teams out there, and UL and IU make sense - educated-guess-wise- as 1-2, there are no, zero, on-paper-likely-great teams. No team this year starts with the look of maybe-greatness as did UNC, tOSU, and UK last October. [And, btw, that includes this season's UK, which returns but a single UK-experienced player, compared to last October's Cats, who returned a very valuable senior glue-guy and 2 very good sophs. I realize that Harrow and Mays may be solid, but UK is not quite the near-lock-to-go-deep as last year.]

    Duke at 15 is no different from Duke at 8, or 6, or 11. For that matter Duke at 8 is no different from KU at 7 or NCSt at 6 or UNC at 12 or Memphis at 16. The early-season games will obviously provide big challenges. The certainty of playing UK, tOSU, and maybe Memphis and UL will test the Devils, and Featherston's optimism.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Lewisville, NC
    Quote Originally Posted by gumbomoop View Post
    I'd add that, while they're are fine teams out there, and UL and IU make sense - educated-guess-wise- as 1-2, there are no, zero, on-paper-likely-great teams. No team this year starts with the look of maybe-greatness as did UNC, tOSU, and UK last October. [And, btw, that includes this season's UK, which returns but a single UK-experienced player, compared to last October's Cats, who returned a very valuable senior glue-guy and 2 very good sophs. I realize that Harrow and Mays may be solid, but UK is not quite the near-lock-to-go-deep as last year.]
    Just a note on your point about UK. Watched the Kentucky All-Access practice coverage on ESPN-U. If I understood correctly, Calipari said they don't have a single returning player who started even one game last year.

    Talk about annual team building.

  11. #11
    Quote Originally Posted by roywhite View Post
    Just a note on your point about UK. Watched the Kentucky All-Access practice coverage on ESPN-U. If I understood correctly, Calipari said they don't have a single returning player who started even one game last year.

    Talk about annual team building.
    That is true, but they do have Kyle Wiltjer, who played 11+ minutes a game, so gumbo's point about them having a single "UK-experienced" player is accurate.

  12. #12
    Quote Originally Posted by gumbomoop View Post
    I'd add that, while they're are fine teams....
    I'll further add that, as an intermittent member of the grammar-spelling police, I am mortified by gumbomoop's truly unforgivable mistake. The above should read: "... while there are fine teams..."

    Should he/she/it attempt to claim a mere typo, don't buy it. He/she/it screwed up, and deserves your scorn. For this reason, among others we might list.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Raleigh, NC
    Quote Originally Posted by gumbomoop View Post
    I'll further add that, as an intermittent member of the grammar-spelling police, I am mortified by gumbomoop's truly unforgivable mistake. The above should read: "... while there are fine teams..."

    Should he/she/it attempt to claim a mere typo, don't buy it. He/she/it screwed up, and deserves your scorn. For this reason, among others we might list.
    I think your being to hard. Its a common eror.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Halifax, Nova Scotia
    Quote Originally Posted by jimsumner View Post
    I think your being to hard. Its a common eror.
    Your off by a bit. Its err.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Raleigh, NC
    Quote Originally Posted by NSDukeFan View Post
    Your off by a bit. Its err.
    Lets knot goe their.

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    New York, NY
    Quote Originally Posted by Lord Ash View Post
    Just wanted someplace to say that this was, as usual, a great piece. Thoughtful, detailed, and as always featuring a few great previously-unknown-to-me tidbits from Duke, ACC, and indeed basketball history. And to be honest, no need for the disclaimer, I don't think!

    Anyway, thanks for such great contributions to all things Duke, to both DBR and Al himself! Now just waiting on the Playcallers first piece!
    I agree. His writings are consistently terrific.

    As for being underrated, I'd say # 8 would be about right if that means that our over/under would be to lose in a regional final. Worse than that would be a let down. Better than that (ie, a final four) would be a pleasant surprise (ok, it's also an annual expectation, but there have been other Duke teams where I'd have been stunned to lose before the final four, and this wouldn't be one of them).

  17. #17
    Quote Originally Posted by Kedsy View Post
    You can make the argument that we haven't had a traditional two-way "Duke" PG since Duhon. Scheyer didn't guard the opposing PG. Paulus was a below-average defender. Dockery couldn't really run the offense. Nolan Smith was a shoot-first guard. It remains to be seen whether Quinn can guard opposing PGs, but if he can, I agree with Mr. Featherston that he'll be our first "real" PG since 2004 (other than 8 games with Kyrie).
    But we're putting ourselves into an awfully small box if a "real Duke" point guard is someone who was recruited as a pure point, never played combo guard, was a good defender who almost always guarded the opposing PG, was a pass-first guy, and so on, aren't we? If we're going to say that Duke hasn't had a "real point guard" since 2004, then, given all the success we've had since then, I'd argue the idea that Coach K teams suddenly go to another level with a true point is a complete myth.

    I'm not saying Cook's improvement won't be an important part of the team - it's better to have a really good point guard than not, and it's better to have someone who can be a "true" point guard on the roster than not. But when you're as flexible with your system as K is from year to year, you can say the same thing to about the same degree with the words "center" or "shooting guard."

    If you want to see an actual example of a program that's dependent on a "true" point to work, look eight miles down the road and two and a half years ago.

  18. #18
    Quote Originally Posted by Wander View Post
    But we're putting ourselves into an awfully small box if a "real Duke" point guard is someone who was recruited as a pure point, never played combo guard, was a good defender who almost always guarded the opposing PG, was a pass-first guy, and so on, aren't we? If we're going to say that Duke hasn't had a "real point guard" since 2004, then, given all the success we've had since then, I'd argue the idea that Coach K teams suddenly go to another level with a true point is a complete myth.
    I suppose, although personally I wouldn't include how they were recruited or what position they played in the past in the definition. The "Duke point guard" is a guy who guards the ball well and runs the offense well. I don't think that box is so small, and we haven't had that guy since 2004.

    Having said that, I totally agree with you that it says a lot about Coach K's flexibility that he's had a great amount of success without such a player for the past 8 years.

  19. #19
    I would agree that Duke hasn't had a "true" point guard in several years (with the obvious exception of Kyrie). Obviously it's not that our guards haven't been talented. But it seems like we haven't had a guard that was both an excellent ball handler and savvy passer since Duhon. . . I think Duke's lack of a "true" point guard in the last couple of years is, at least partly responsible for the recent stigma that Duke doesn't develop big men. Remember how Mason played when Kyrie was directing the offense? I know Coach K isn't a big believer in rigidly defined positions (point guard, shooting guard, etc.), but it's been a long time since I have seen a true 1/point guard. I think a more traditionally defined point guard would seriously help out our big men.

    I'm really hoping Quinn has improved a lot from the summer and has fully rehabbed his knee. I'm excited to see how Mason plays with a point that can get him some easy looks at the basket.

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Atlanta, GA
    Quote Originally Posted by Farm4Duke View Post
    I would agree that Duke hasn't had a "true" point guard in several years (with the obvious exception of Kyrie). Obviously it's not that our guards haven't been talented. But it seems like we haven't had a guard that was both an excellent ball handler and savvy passer since Duhon. . . I think Duke's lack of a "true" point guard in the last couple of years is, at least partly responsible for the recent stigma that Duke doesn't develop big men. Remember how Mason played when Kyrie was directing the offense? I know Coach K isn't a big believer in rigidly defined positions (point guard, shooting guard, etc.), but it's been a long time since I have seen a true 1/point guard. I think a more traditionally defined point guard would seriously help out our big men.

    I'm really hoping Quinn has improved a lot from the summer and has fully rehabbed his knee. I'm excited to see how Mason plays with a point that can get him some easy looks at the basket.
    I believe that the point guard is actually the only position that he likes to rigidly, specifically define.

Similar Threads

  1. Overrated / Underrated
    By Udaman in forum Elizabeth King Forum
    Replies: 44
    Last Post: 01-12-2012, 02:46 PM
  2. Featherston: Duke Hits The Road
    By Bob Green in forum Elizabeth King Forum
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 01-12-2011, 01:43 PM
  3. Florida St. really good/underrated
    By houstondukie in forum Elizabeth King Forum
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 02-23-2009, 04:49 PM
  4. Featherston's The Best
    By Faison1 in forum Elizabeth King Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-15-2008, 11:57 AM
  5. Duke Preview - Al Featherston
    By gw67 in forum Elizabeth King Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 11-08-2007, 09:14 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •