Originally Posted by
jimsumner
Which leads to the MVP question. Kemp is having a marvelous season for a team that's never really been in contention. So, where does that leave him?
Full disclosure. If I had a vote, I'd be leaning towards Fielder, having a slightly less marvelous season for a division winner.
I've never understood the argument that the MVP has to play for a team in contention. What makes Fielder's numbers more impressive just because his jersey says Brewers instead of Dodgers? I guess it's all in how you define what the MVP is. I think of the MVP as the best player period. If Kemp's numbers are better I don't think who you play for should enter into the equation. Maybe the Brewers would have had an even better record if Fielder would have had Kemp's numbers? Just sayin.
"The future ain't what it used to be."