Originally Posted by
CajunDevil
The stats are interesting, but I'd be more interested in how they are trending rather than simple averages.
We have a whole thread on this already. I'm not sure what trend you are interested in, but here is the "big vs. small" breakdown since the first UNC game:
Code:
Game Kyle at 4/5 Kyle on bench Kyle at 3
----- ----------- -------------- ------------
UNC 1 10 min, -7 0 min 30 min, +13
Miami 14 min, 0 0 min 26 min, +10
UVa 9 min, -1 17 min, +7 14 min, + 9
GaTech 12 min, +8 4 min, -2 24 min, +16
Temple 8 min, +7 1 min, +1 31 min, +9
VaTech 7 min, +4 0 min 33 min, -8
Clemson 17 min, +9 3 min, -4 20 min, +6
UNC 2 12 min, -4 0 min 28 min, -10
So I don't see much of a performance trend, but other than the Clemson game, the "small" lineup advocated by some is playing between 20% and 35% of the game.
As far as the original question of this thread, the problem with playing the "small" lineup for long periods (as we've been debating for the past year) is it can raise some defensive issues. We can talk about what we want to happen until our faces turn (hopefully Duke) blue, but I'd be very surprised if K makes an about face now and makes the small lineup the predominant lineup at this point in the season.
Which leaves us with possibly changing Miles in for Ryan, and I suppose that's possible based on how everyone practices this week. But I also don't think Coach K would make a change based on one bad game for Ryan and one good game for Miles. Overall, I think Ryan has been playing very well. Unless K sees a drop off in practice, I don't think it would be fair to bench him because he missed a few outside shots in Chapel Hill.